• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Must a Vulcan MC "lose control"?

Ragitsu

Commodore
Commodore
Good morning.

In any theoretical Star Trek series which features a Vulcan as a main character (e.g., TOS, VOY and ENT), should there be at least one episode where the Vulcan in question is unable to maintain the race's normal emotional suppression, be it due to the Pon Farr, a mind meld gone awry, an unusual alien attack disrupting mental balance, et cetera? Is this necessary?
 
It give the actor the opportunity to do something other than be stoic all the time. Indeed, you'll note in other shows which have a stoic main character in their cast there will be frequent attempts over the course of the series to have them shed that stoic persona for an episode here and there. That's just how television works.
And drama in general. Vulcans can be prone to errors and ill actions. They're not Steven Seagal or Walker: Texas Perfect Bore.
 
In any theoretical Star Trek series which features a Vulcan as a main character (e.g., TOS, VOY and ENT), should there be at least one episode where the Vulcan in question is unable to maintain the race's normal emotional suppression, be it due to the Pon Farr, a mind meld gone awry, an unusual alien attack disrupting mental balance, et cetera? Is this necessary?
The Writers of STRANGE NEW WORLDS: HELL YES it's necessary. We'd do it every episode if we could.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
I hope they can find new interesting ways of doing it. So far, we have:

* Must mate (Amok Time, Blood Fever)
* Must kill (Field of Fire)
* Must assert my superiority (Take Me Out To The Holosuite)
 
The Writers of STRANGE NEW WORLDS: HELL YES it's necessary. We'd do it every episode if we could.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

They must have it out for stoicism.

Vulcans have emotions, so I would think that they would occasionally have emotional outbursts.

I do not mind masterful (tactical) use of sarcasm; after all, what is a Vulcan without a bit of an attitude? What I spoke of was more along the lines of stark and unbridled emotion ->

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
? Is this necessary?
No, it is not. It can be utilize, like any dramatic tool. Take a look at Brooklyn 99 and how they utilize Captain Holt. His often stoic demeanor is used as an offset of the more emotional other characters, but still subjected to while, interests and preferences.
 
They must have it out for stoicism.
I really wish the SNW writers realized that having Spock lose his stoicism so often on the show means that him acting emotional is no longer shocking in the least. And even if it's only happening once a season, a 10 episode season vs. a 26 episode season means that cumulatively, Spock acting emotionally is happening more often.

They made a similar mistake on the Kelvin movies. Zachary Quinto's Spock lost his temper about once a movie, as I recall. By the end of three movies, it's no longer "OMG, Spock is losing his temper!!!", it's that Spock has become that hothead who loses his temper a lot.
 
It’s by no means necessary, but it’s likely to happen because the writers will almost inevitably choose to go there. I’d be perfectly fine with a Vulcan protagonist who remained unflappable throughout.
 
To be fair, young Spock Prime didn't experience the loss of his people and homeworld. The Intrepid was traumatizing enough.

If the Vulcan loses it, things must be bad/wrong. The ship has a stoic as a status barometer.
 
Good morning.

In any theoretical Star Trek series which features a Vulcan as a main character (e.g., TOS, VOY and ENT), should there be at least one episode where the Vulcan in question is unable to maintain the race's normal emotional suppression, be it due to the Pon Farr, a mind meld gone awry, an unusual alien attack disrupting mental balance, et cetera? Is this necessary?
They'd be dull as hell otherwise, so yes. Spock in TOS was the first, and the pattern was set.

I just see it as Vulcans being a really dysfunctional society.
 
They made a similar mistake on the Kelvin movies. Zachary Quinto's Spock lost his temper about once a movie, as I recall. By the end of three movies, it's no longer "OMG, Spock is losing his temper!!!", it's that Spock has become that hothead who loses his temper a lot.
I can't imagine why? He just lost his mom and whole planet and had a wish to die at times. It's crazy what might happen to people to cause them to lose their stuff.

Spock has always been a hothead. He regulates it well.
 
Good morning.

In any theoretical Star Trek series which features a Vulcan as a main character (e.g., TOS, VOY and ENT), should there be at least one episode where the Vulcan in question is unable to maintain the race's normal emotional suppression, be it due to the Pon Farr, a mind meld gone awry, an unusual alien attack disrupting mental balance, et cetera? Is this necessary?
They're on TV show that is built on character drama, so of course it is.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top