Is it? It all still really happened. Unlike some other Trek eps where everything literally was all a dream.It reminded me of stories written by little kids when the ending is just...they woke up and it was all a dream...
That's not the same thing as being a dream. And there are some amazing Trek episodes where the main characters were in no physical danger at all.The characters were never in danger.
That's not the same thing as being a dream. And there are some amazing Trek episodes where the main characters were in no physical danger at all.
Wow. Absolute rubbish.
Other than the scenes by Quark, this has to be one of the worst episodes ever produced in DS9.
It reminded me of stories written by little kids when the ending is just...they woke up and it was all a dream...
I am one of the defenders of "MOVE ALONG HOME".
I am one of the defenders of "MOVE ALONG HOME".
Wow. Absolute rubbish.
Other than the scenes by Quark, this has to be one of the worst episodes ever produced in DS9.
It reminded me of stories written by little kids when the ending is just...they woke up and it was all a dream...
Or the episode is trying to make the audience feel uncomfortable because good sci-fi is supposed to get people out of their comfy zone?
Though I'll agree, Quark's subplot was a fantastic epiphany, the rest of it was a tad generic like a video game. But what it had in generic plot was made up for by bestowing an uneasy feel. Which I believe may have been the intent?
Or it's a bad episode and I'm thinking from too many points of view. I choose the former, it's meant to give an aura of disconcerting feel.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.