I have been posting on a topic at the Next Generation forum called: 'Monster? Q the teacher in "Tepestry", Q the judge in "All Good Things"' and came to this train of thought:
So I am going to continue my train of thought here, so how about it, is Q a good idea as a character, or, as inspiration for future characters in Star Trek such as XII and XIII?
Q was dangerous but by the end of the TNG series I believe he was definitely something more than just Q the monster, he took Picard through a tempering process and Picard came out of the fire a better man.
As a quick side note, I would have loved to have seen Q in one of the TNG films, however I think he could easily work in Kirk's time too in one of the new films. I have often wondered why they didn't use John De Lancie's character in the films. Q in JJ's universe could work today, using De Lancie with Q he would have to be older but that could work with a young Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock, and Bones McCoy we could get a different chemistry than we have seen already and it would be fresh and new. If Kirk were to go through a his own crucible under Q what would he come out like. Q could play the father figure, or Q could be the wise Priest, he could bring in that classic humor that would fit with old Trek and he would certainly be no Harry Mudd.
Q was a great idea and character in Star Trek and demonstrates the sophistication that Star Trek had. I feel that the story-telling had lost that kind of intellect by Enterprise with it's terribly obvious messages and unrealisticly flawless human characters, who should have been far more three-dimensional than they were portrayed.
I would like a more ambiguous character like Q in future Star Trek stories, not the god-like powers, but the ability to question the main characters and their motives again. I think we could find that in old characters like Commander Kor who could easily come back as a noble yet dangerous Klingon who challenges Kirk again as an antagonist, even to tempt Kirk in someway, either through anger or glory. We need something other than another Nero who was two-dimensional (he still worked in XI). Khan could be brought back but take away Khan's anger and need for revenge, give him some good and noble qualities, give him some questions for Kirk to struggle with, heck he could become Kirk's close friend before having a falling out and a conflict of sorts. So you see ambiguity fits with the modern movie goers sensibilities right now, Q became very ambiguous by the end of TNG and that style of character can and should inspire future Trek characters.
So I am going to continue my train of thought here, so how about it, is Q a good idea as a character, or, as inspiration for future characters in Star Trek such as XII and XIII?