• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Major new exoplanet findings to be announced next Monday

That's all kind of what I thought, but I see these articles that say that planets are "the right size" to possibly support life, and I just wonder...what is the wrong size?
 
By wrong size they probably mean gas giants.

Any planet that's massive enough will retain enough of its atmosphere to make the air pressures at the surface, if it has a surface, pretty hostile for anything. If we judge by the giant planets that we know of, if it has a surface it won't be solid, so the best that you can get is some kind of an ocean, but extremely different from the oceans we know.

The atmosphere pressure at the “surface” on Neptune is 10 GPa, which is a bit extreme (1000 times more than the surface of Venus, and 100 times more than Mariana trench): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(pressure)

Not that life capable of withstanding such pressure is impossible to exist, but it wouldn't be the place where I'd start looking for life.

Though I don't understand why the idea about floating life forming in the upper atmosphere is so easily dismissed these days.
 
So...how big does a planet have to be before it's considered "too big" to support life?

I don't think anyone can really speculate, except to say that the heavier the planet, the smaller and/or lighter the life forms are likely to be.

Similarly, when we meet the Martians, they'll all look like the Michelin Man.

Makes one wonder... If we imagine for a moment that Mars used to be habitable and well populated with life, what would a period analogous to our Jurassic period produce on such a planet?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top