Well, since Japan has 127 million people within its borders (as of 2012) and South Korea has 50 million, and those who claim such nationalities abroad are probably of a similar ratio, I would surmise that it's more a function of population than difficulty.There are about 125 million Japanese speakers, and about 77 million Korean speakers. So it stands to reason that Korean is harder to learn.
Well, since Japan has 127 million people within its borders (as of 2012) and South Korea has 50 million, and those who claim such nationalities abroad are probably of a similar ratio, I would surmise that it's more a function of population than difficulty.There are about 125 million Japanese speakers, and about 77 million Korean speakers. So it stands to reason that Korean is harder to learn.
Ah...missed that...Well, since Japan has 127 million people within its borders (as of 2012) and South Korea has 50 million, and those who claim such nationalities abroad are probably of a similar ratio, I would surmise that it's more a function of population than difficulty.There are about 125 million Japanese speakers, and about 77 million Korean speakers. So it stands to reason that Korean is harder to learn.
O RLY?
![]()
Heh...actually, no. I embarassingly took it literally. Humor...it is a difficult concept...especially without smilies.He might be out deadpanning you. That would be impressive. Probably not though...
Korean is much easier because the characters are basically just another type of alphabet. Not hard to learn for Westerners at all. Once you know the alphabet it's not much harder than any Western language.
Japanese on the other hand includes 3 different types of character sets. Hiragana and Katakana are relatively easy to learn (syllabic scripts) but Kenji is a bloody pain in the ass and requires years of training. It's the old Chinese characters (before they were simplified) and to read a high-brow newspaper you'll basically have to learn thousands of them by heart. They could easily just switch to one of the syllabic scripts but I think they don't do it for elitist reasons. Knowing or not knowing Kenji characters can determine your social position in society. It's not pretty.
I've learned Japanese for a few years because I used to have a very weird idea of what "fun" is.
Go Korean, seriously.
Well, if the OP just wants to learn to speak the language, that doesn't matter as much. Japanese is probably easier to learn to speak than English. However if you won't be in a position to practice it regularly, you'll forget it again, so I would go with whichever you will be able to use most.Korean is much easier because the characters are basically just another type of alphabet. Not hard to learn for Westerners at all. Once you know the alphabet it's not much harder than any Western language.
Japanese on the other hand includes 3 different types of character sets. Hiragana and Katakana are relatively easy to learn (syllabic scripts) but Kenji is a bloody pain in the ass and requires years of training. It's the old Chinese characters (before they were simplified) and to read a high-brow newspaper you'll basically have to learn thousands of them by heart. They could easily just switch to one of the syllabic scripts but I think they don't do it for elitist reasons. Knowing or not knowing Kenji characters can determine your social position in society. It's not pretty.
I've learned Japanese for a few years because I used to have a very weird idea of what "fun" is.
Go Korean, seriously.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.