• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Just when you thought the price of hydrogen was going up!

Bud Brewster

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
Found this in Science Daily, a straightforward science story for the common man (like me. :D) The article starts with the text below. Click on the picture for the complete article.



Researchers at North Carolina State University have shown that a one-atom thick film of molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) may work as an effective catalyst for creating hydrogen. The work opens a new door for the production of cheap hydrogen.

Hydrogen holds great promise as an energy source, but the production of hydrogen from water electrolysis -- freeing hydrogen from water with electricity -- currently relies in large part on the use of expensive platinum catalysts. The new research shows that MoS2 atomically thin films are also effective catalysts for hydrogen production and -- while not as efficient as platinum -- are relatively inexpensive.

"We found that the thickness of the thin film is very important," says Dr. Linyou Cao, an assistant professor of materials science and engineering at NC State and senior author of a paper describing the work. "A thin film consisting of a single layer of atoms was the most efficient, with every additional layer of atoms making the catalytic performance approximately five times worse."
_______________________________________________

This concept is cool for two reasons, guys.

(1) They’re making cheap hydrogen so we can stop using gasoline and start drive around in cars that float like the Hindenburg ( – okay, I’m just kidding about the floating part).

(2) They’re using a piece of material that’s only one molecule thick – but not as a filter, as a catalyst.

I’ll let the article explain the rest of this development.
 
They’re making cheap hydrogen so we can stop using gasoline and start drive around in cars that float like the Hindenburg ( – okay, I’m just kidding about the floating part).

Hindenburg and hydrogen both got a bad wrap--although the mythbusters proved it wasn't the SRB doping compounds in the canvas after all.

The problem with hydrogen is that it is a bear to work with. To get helium, we will continue to need natural gas wells.

Something you may not have heard. Water vapor that comes from hydrogen burning cars--well water vapor is actually a more severe greenhouse gas than CO2 itself.

If you could replace Venus' atmosphere with a same concentration of water vapor--it would get hotter.

Now, not to worry---the thinking is that the hydrologic cycle would rain out the excess H2O faster than the carbon cycle could fix the carbon back into biomass.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top