Okay... so I'm chatting on Facebook with a mate about BSG. A friend of his chimes in to say:
She was writing to say she gave up on BSG after the first episode, and when she uses the 'mother bitch woman in power trope' she is referring to Roslin. I disagree with the analysis, but after one episode, well, fair enough if that's your opinion. Whatever.
Then the original friend I'm having the discussion with responds to her, saying:
and I'm like WOAH, wait a second, and I say:
My mate bounces back:
and his friend follows up:
and I respond:
to which she responds:
I have not responded and the thread ended on that note. I'm coming to the BBS to ask... who is right here? Was Janeway really written as 'flip-floppy', and, if so, is that an example of the mother bitch woman in power trope? OR is that interpretation something that would never be applied to a male character written in exactly the same way?
I honestly don't know the answer here, will take advice on the matter.
Yeah, sexy cylons really broke it for me straight away. And the usual mother bitch woman in power trope. I guess there's a particular type of bad writing I just can't stand. Indeed it's probably the whole using sex stupidity, sexism, and using stupid tropes about women that hits the top of the list.
She was writing to say she gave up on BSG after the first episode, and when she uses the 'mother bitch woman in power trope' she is referring to Roslin. I disagree with the analysis, but after one episode, well, fair enough if that's your opinion. Whatever.
Then the original friend I'm having the discussion with responds to her, saying:
As for President Rosyln, I get your beef with the character (and hate Janeway for pretty much that reason) but pretty quickly Roslyn felt like a more complex character acting outside of those two polar opposites.
and I'm like WOAH, wait a second, and I say:
You hate Janeway?!? Because you think she's a mother bitch woman in power? I get not liking Voyager the show, but as someone who has watched the show through at least three times, I reject that characterisation strongly.
I also find that description sort of oddly gendered. What episode did Janeway act like a 'mother bitch' in which, if you flipped the gender, you would just say that was their character, as a man? The writers of Voyager had to walk a very fine line with that character and I thought by and large they did a pretty great job. I think calling her, or Roslin, a mother bitch archetype is not only poor analysis but also kinda sexist.
My mate bounces back:
I should clarify - it's not that I hated the character herself - it's that I hated the writing for Janeway because it seemed to flip between those two extremes, which was frustrating, rather than letting Janeway be a more complex, nuanced character.
I can see how the same criticism could be made of Roslyn, but I personally disagree.
It's not a matter of hating the character, but writing that felt like it couldn't consolidate two separate and important parts of a character.
And yes, the description is gendered because it seems to be female characters that get lumped with clumsy writing more than male.
But I apologise for what that sounded like - laying the blame for that at Janeway's feet. Absolutely not the case, and I love the example that Kate Mulgrew has been for women in STEM as well.
and his friend follows up:
Yes, Janeway for me also suffered from mother bitch syndrome. And the problem is precisely that it is a gendered trope where most women in power are portrayed as these weird flip-flopping mother bitch characters, soft one moment hard the next, for no apparently good reason. Thinking about female characters in authority positions far too many of them are written this way. It's very irritating. And while I get TV shows may have inconsistencies or get around to fleshing out their characters eventually it's something that instantly annoys me so it doesn't make for a great viewing experience. Just one of my main irks so I think I have a much quicker no response to it than other things.
and I respond:
I still feel like there is a double-standard being applied here. Take Picard- he was variously written as a grumpy asshole, a cerebral archaeologist, and a gun-toting, buggy-drivin' action hero. Yes, this is a product of being a character in an anthology show written by many different writers. Voyager was also an anthology show with many different writers, but I actually think Janeway was written far more consistently due to the fact that Jeri Taylor and Kate Mulgrew *knew* they'd be under additional scrutiny so were very careful to craft her character in a specific direction. And yet even then we've got people saying she was a 'mother bitch'. But I never hear gendered epithets being thrown at Picard's feet for the same (or worse) 'writing inconsistency', so I do feel like there is a special standard being applied to Janeway due to her gender.
I think it's fine not to like Janeway. I think saying she's an example of the 'mother bitch woman in power trope' is a sexist double-standard. Even TV Tropes doesn't apply that label to her (they call it the 'depending on the writer' trope, instead, which I prefer).
to which she responds:
The mother-bitch thing is a trope because it is sexist writing. It's not just Janeway, it's not just inconsistent writing, it's a very particular way that female characters in power are written. You can call it fluffy and hardass if you like. It's the fact that these characters flip between those two states for no good reason. Not just inconsistency but a specific inconsistency for female characters in power.
I have not responded and the thread ended on that note. I'm coming to the BBS to ask... who is right here? Was Janeway really written as 'flip-floppy', and, if so, is that an example of the mother bitch woman in power trope? OR is that interpretation something that would never be applied to a male character written in exactly the same way?
I honestly don't know the answer here, will take advice on the matter.