Cheapjack said:
Lt Arex, that cat creature, the one with three legs, etc.
Cheapjack said:
Perhaps that's why it's taking so long for post production.
I personally thought that Nemesis had some of the best effects of the more recent Trek movies. I thought that the space battle/Big E crash was perfectly rendered.Kpnuts said:
And Nemesis was just horrible CGI wise.
Kokomo said:
I personally thought that Nemesis had some of the best effects of the more recent Trek movies. I thought that the space battle/Big E crash was perfectly rendered.Kpnuts said:
And Nemesis was just horrible CGI wise.
Mutenroshi said:
Cheapjack said:
Perhaps that's why it's taking so long for post production.
Tiny nitpick: the movie is in preproduction right now.![]()
Really? I watched it and honestly don't see how it was done with physical models. If it was, in fact, a largely physical effect, it HAD to have been supplemented with a lot of CGI elements, it seems. So,perhaps it was more of a "hybrid" effect?Vektor said:The collision between the Enterprise and the Romulan ship in Nemesis was not CGI, it was done with physical models. Anyone who has a problem with the realism of that scene can't blame it on those lazy, new-fangled computer generated special effects.
I actually haerd they're considering making Roger Rabbit a late-shift helmsman.seigezunt said:
No CGI characters, please. They still SCREAM "hey look at me, I'm the non-live action guy! Say hi to cartoony me, sticking out like a sore thumb!!!"
Cary L. Brown said:
Really? I watched it and honestly don't see how it was done with physical models. If it was, in fact, a largely physical effect, it HAD to have been supplemented with a lot of CGI elements, it seems. So,perhaps it was more of a "hybrid" effect?Vektor said:The collision between the Enterprise and the Romulan ship in Nemesis was not CGI, it was done with physical models. Anyone who has a problem with the realism of that scene can't blame it on those lazy, new-fangled computer generated special effects.
The little bits and pieces flying off in all directlys, the crumpling plating... it looked too... "good"... to be a physical model.
Maybe my eyes aren't as well-calibrated as I think that they are, but that's my take on it.
Any backup to support this that I can check out? I'm really pretty curious right now.
Cary L. Brown said:
Really? I watched it and honestly don't see how it was done with physical models. If it was, in fact, a largely physical effect, it HAD to have been supplemented with a lot of CGI elements, it seems. So,perhaps it was more of a "hybrid" effect?Vektor said:The collision between the Enterprise and the Romulan ship in Nemesis was not CGI, it was done with physical models. Anyone who has a problem with the realism of that scene can't blame it on those lazy, new-fangled computer generated special effects.
The little bits and pieces flying off in all directlys, the crumpling plating... it looked too... "good"... to be a physical model.
Maybe my eyes aren't as well-calibrated as I think that they are, but that's my take on it.
Any backup to support this that I can check out? I'm really pretty curious right now.
Kpnuts said:
and the lighting in the Rift was awful.
trevanian said:the lighting was really bad on the rift stuff
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.