I have seen the objection raised that Voyager should not have taken too much risks or included lots of conflict because that would have made it like "Mad Max in Space."
I do not believe this is a good objection, because if Voyager was like "Mad Max in Space," that would be amazing!
The official stated premise of Voyager certainly makes it sound exactly like that is what Voyager would be:
Indeed, one of VOY's very best episode, The Void, is pretty much "Mad Max in Space," and VOY would have been all the better for it if there were way more episode like that.
So for those who say that making VOY like "Mad Max in Space" is a bad idea, I ask: why is that a bad idea?
And, how would that be worse than the VOY that they did make?
I do not believe this is a good objection, because if Voyager was like "Mad Max in Space," that would be amazing!
The official stated premise of Voyager certainly makes it sound exactly like that is what Voyager would be:
Pulled to the far side of the Galaxy, where the Federation is 75 years away at maximum warp speed, a Starfleet ship must cooperate with Maquis rebels to find a way home.
Indeed, one of VOY's very best episode, The Void, is pretty much "Mad Max in Space," and VOY would have been all the better for it if there were way more episode like that.
So for those who say that making VOY like "Mad Max in Space" is a bad idea, I ask: why is that a bad idea?
And, how would that be worse than the VOY that they did make?