As if lovers of 2-D film needed another reason to hate 3-D, comes this story in the Boston Globe from back in May 2011 (but it deserves widespread attention).
Reportedly a number of theaters that have had 3-D projectors installed are not properly swapping out the lenses when using the machines for 2-D films. The result being s*itty picture quality.
http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/art...lens_leaves_2_d_movies_in_the_dark/?page=full
Before this turns into an excuse for 3-D apologists to get all high and mighty, it should be noted that the article cites numerous examples of non-3-D films (as in films never intended to be shown in 3-D) being affected, including The Hangover and even Jane Eyre. It's not just a case of a theatre being snarky because you've decided to see the 2-D version of Deathly Hallows instead of paying extra for the 3-D version. It means you could be heading in to see, say, Ewen McGregor's new film, Beginners (about a man and his dying father - not exactly 3-D material), and be screwed over.
The move to 3-D has actually prevented me from going to the movies much this past year, so I honestly haven't seen any indication of this happening myself. Maybe someone in Boston can chime in if this has been their experience?
The most handy bit of information in the article, one I'll remember when I go to see the 2-D version of Deathly Hallows this weekend, is that if the picture looks dark, look back and see how many light streams are coming out of the booth. If you see 2, then they've left the 3-D lens in. Good luck getting a refund but maybe if enough people raise a stink theatre owners will smarten up. I'd also contact the studios of any non-3-D film and let them know. Warners won't be sympathetic if you bitch about Harry Potter, but they might be if you let them know their future Best Picture nominee chick flick is being ruined.
Alex
PS. I put this in the SF/F forum because 3-D films are primarily of that genre. If a mod feels this is more appropriate for TV & Media, I've no objection to it being moved.
Reportedly a number of theaters that have had 3-D projectors installed are not properly swapping out the lenses when using the machines for 2-D films. The result being s*itty picture quality.
http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/art...lens_leaves_2_d_movies_in_the_dark/?page=full
Before this turns into an excuse for 3-D apologists to get all high and mighty, it should be noted that the article cites numerous examples of non-3-D films (as in films never intended to be shown in 3-D) being affected, including The Hangover and even Jane Eyre. It's not just a case of a theatre being snarky because you've decided to see the 2-D version of Deathly Hallows instead of paying extra for the 3-D version. It means you could be heading in to see, say, Ewen McGregor's new film, Beginners (about a man and his dying father - not exactly 3-D material), and be screwed over.
The move to 3-D has actually prevented me from going to the movies much this past year, so I honestly haven't seen any indication of this happening myself. Maybe someone in Boston can chime in if this has been their experience?
The most handy bit of information in the article, one I'll remember when I go to see the 2-D version of Deathly Hallows this weekend, is that if the picture looks dark, look back and see how many light streams are coming out of the booth. If you see 2, then they've left the 3-D lens in. Good luck getting a refund but maybe if enough people raise a stink theatre owners will smarten up. I'd also contact the studios of any non-3-D film and let them know. Warners won't be sympathetic if you bitch about Harry Potter, but they might be if you let them know their future Best Picture nominee chick flick is being ruined.
Alex
PS. I put this in the SF/F forum because 3-D films are primarily of that genre. If a mod feels this is more appropriate for TV & Media, I've no objection to it being moved.