Mark Hamill has told a story many times to the effect of "the script says 'Obi Wan killed your father' but James Earl Jones changes the line and says "I am your father" - and only he and Hamill knew of this.
I understand that keeping a "big reveal" is exciting, and I don't doubt that they tried to keep spoilers as 'hush-hush' as possible, but I think this is was only a fun story to tell in retrospect 30-40 years later. I don't think the degree of secrecy that Mark Hamill, George Lucas, and James Earl Jones imply is actually true. Here is my reasoning:
Firstly, after the big reveal, Vader then says:
Was the original line for cast and crew just to say "Join me as master and apprentice" or something? It doesn't seem like good motivation to join Vader (who is objectively a villain) just because he says your master is also a bad guy.
Secondly, earlier in the film Yoda says:
surely this line is to correlate Luke, anger, and the dark side, and in retrospect makes the audience realize that Vader is Luke's father. Why would the script use that specific line if Luke's father is actually a "good guy" - was this line also changed in post so that it was kept secret from the cast and crew? So is now Frank Oz in on the secret?
Thirdly, at the end of the film, Luke telepathically speaks to Vader and calls him father. The Dialog at 1:57:50 in the film is
Does the cast and crew think that vader is taunting luke, and why is luke saying "father"? Everyone is watching Mark Hamill laying on a medical bay, none of them ask why he says the word "father"? Is this dialog exchange also swapped out, if so, what does the original script say?
Fourth, when vader and the emperor speak, perhaps I misunderstand the dialog, but twice Vader tries to steer the conversation away from Killing Luke. Yes- in all the script versions, Vader wants to overthrow the emperor, but
Here's an interview with the editor of the movie, where he also says it was a secret, but then afterwards says and he says he wasn't given the dialog, but then afterwards he says "I'm blurry on that" and "I find that irrelevant" https://www.youtube.com/live/yPhphAXq5b4?feature=share&t=1250
I understand that in a rough draft of the script, Luke's father appears as a ghost and mentions Luke's sister, and Vader still says "together we could rule the galaxy" - but that script is vastly different than the finished product and would not have been used by the cast or crew - http://www.starwarz.com/starkiller/the-empire-strikes-back-first-draft-by-leigh-brackett-transcript/
I've also seen the fourth draft script date 1978- which doesn't mention the fathe/ son thing - but also luke doesn't lose his hand
and finally there is the fifth draft script from 1980 which allegedly has the father reveal omitted, This website sold a copy of that script, but they don't show what these alternate lines would have looked like https://entertainment.ha.com/itm/mo...empire-strikes-back-tcf-1980-/a/7351-89517.s#
My last comments would be -
1) Did Mark Hamill need any acting direction during the med-bay scene on the Falcon? Did the director have to say in front of the rest of the cast "Now, you just learned that Obi-wan killed your father, so you need to act sad, and say father while you telepathically speak with Darth Vader"
2) Did the people in the sound booth with James Earl Jones cover their ears when he made his recordings?
3) If "Obi-wan killed your father" was actually said, how come that never came out as a spoiler prior to the movie's release? Certainly the fake dialog would have been revealed and shared. We are to believe that George lucas did not trust the crew, but they were actually trustworthy all along?
Also, here is an alleged article of David Prowse also being aware of the secret in 1978 https://i.stack.imgur.com/3V0wA.jpg
Thank you for reading - I don't mean to make a grand conspiracy out of this, I just don't think that logistically this was as big a secret as the internet makes it out to be. I don't doubt that efforts were taken to exclude the line from the script. I don't think the rest of the plot holds up when you change that line, though. I don't think making Obi-Wan the killer of Luke's father (from a certain point of view) would encourage Luke to join the dark side, and would make the rest of the plot fall apart.
I understand that keeping a "big reveal" is exciting, and I don't doubt that they tried to keep spoilers as 'hush-hush' as possible, but I think this is was only a fun story to tell in retrospect 30-40 years later. I don't think the degree of secrecy that Mark Hamill, George Lucas, and James Earl Jones imply is actually true. Here is my reasoning:
Firstly, after the big reveal, Vader then says:
" Luke. You can destroy the Emperor.
He has foreseen this. It is your
destiny. Join me, and together
we can rule the galaxy as father
and son. Come with me. It is the
only way."
Was the original line for cast and crew just to say "Join me as master and apprentice" or something? It doesn't seem like good motivation to join Vader (who is objectively a villain) just because he says your master is also a bad guy.
Secondly, earlier in the film Yoda says:
"Hmmm. Much anger in him, like his father." -
surely this line is to correlate Luke, anger, and the dark side, and in retrospect makes the audience realize that Vader is Luke's father. Why would the script use that specific line if Luke's father is actually a "good guy" - was this line also changed in post so that it was kept secret from the cast and crew? So is now Frank Oz in on the secret?
Thirdly, at the end of the film, Luke telepathically speaks to Vader and calls him father. The Dialog at 1:57:50 in the film is
Vader :Luke
Luke: Father
Vader: Come with me
Luke: Ben, why didn't you tell me
Vader: Luke it is your destiny
luke: Ben, why didn't you tell me
Does the cast and crew think that vader is taunting luke, and why is luke saying "father"? Everyone is watching Mark Hamill laying on a medical bay, none of them ask why he says the word "father"? Is this dialog exchange also swapped out, if so, what does the original script say?
Fourth, when vader and the emperor speak, perhaps I misunderstand the dialog, but twice Vader tries to steer the conversation away from Killing Luke. Yes- in all the script versions, Vader wants to overthrow the emperor, but
EMPEROR
He could destroy us.
VADER
He's just a boy. Obi-Wan can no
longer help him.
EMPEROR
The Force is strong with him. The
son of Skywalker must not become a
Jedi.
VADER
If he could be turned, he would
become a powerful ally.
EMPEROR
Yes. Yes. He would be a great
asset. Can it be done?
VADER
He will join us or die, my
master.
Here's an interview with the editor of the movie, where he also says it was a secret, but then afterwards says and he says he wasn't given the dialog, but then afterwards he says "I'm blurry on that" and "I find that irrelevant" https://www.youtube.com/live/yPhphAXq5b4?feature=share&t=1250
I understand that in a rough draft of the script, Luke's father appears as a ghost and mentions Luke's sister, and Vader still says "together we could rule the galaxy" - but that script is vastly different than the finished product and would not have been used by the cast or crew - http://www.starwarz.com/starkiller/the-empire-strikes-back-first-draft-by-leigh-brackett-transcript/
I've also seen the fourth draft script date 1978- which doesn't mention the fathe/ son thing - but also luke doesn't lose his hand
and finally there is the fifth draft script from 1980 which allegedly has the father reveal omitted, This website sold a copy of that script, but they don't show what these alternate lines would have looked like https://entertainment.ha.com/itm/mo...empire-strikes-back-tcf-1980-/a/7351-89517.s#
My last comments would be -
1) Did Mark Hamill need any acting direction during the med-bay scene on the Falcon? Did the director have to say in front of the rest of the cast "Now, you just learned that Obi-wan killed your father, so you need to act sad, and say father while you telepathically speak with Darth Vader"
2) Did the people in the sound booth with James Earl Jones cover their ears when he made his recordings?
3) If "Obi-wan killed your father" was actually said, how come that never came out as a spoiler prior to the movie's release? Certainly the fake dialog would have been revealed and shared. We are to believe that George lucas did not trust the crew, but they were actually trustworthy all along?
Also, here is an alleged article of David Prowse also being aware of the secret in 1978 https://i.stack.imgur.com/3V0wA.jpg
Thank you for reading - I don't mean to make a grand conspiracy out of this, I just don't think that logistically this was as big a secret as the internet makes it out to be. I don't doubt that efforts were taken to exclude the line from the script. I don't think the rest of the plot holds up when you change that line, though. I don't think making Obi-Wan the killer of Luke's father (from a certain point of view) would encourage Luke to join the dark side, and would make the rest of the plot fall apart.