What the hell are they? What does it mean when Beverly Crusher, for example, says the readings are humanoid? Humanoid is a shape--is that what this means, that the sensors actually sense rough shape, 2 legs, 2 arms, thorax? (multiple arms or legs would mean that we are not talking about a quadruped and no matter what the shape it wouldn't be humanoid) I guess that's possible--some sort of superexact radar function? So a quadruple amputee human being or Klingon wouldn't show up human to these sensors?--hard to believe. Honestly I don't buy that these sensors sense shape.
Internal organ placement and orientations? Some commonality of general shapes employed for whatever functions? But that's shape again.
A common humanoid biochemical signature? But that would mean that Federation science long had a very good reason to suspect what they learned in the Chase and that it shouldn't have been a lone scientist's dream. And if Federation scientists didn't suspect that, then the designers of the sensors should never have believed that this signature would necessarily apply to any newly encountered humanoid species.
Internal organ placement and orientations? Some commonality of general shapes employed for whatever functions? But that's shape again.
A common humanoid biochemical signature? But that would mean that Federation science long had a very good reason to suspect what they learned in the Chase and that it shouldn't have been a lone scientist's dream. And if Federation scientists didn't suspect that, then the designers of the sensors should never have believed that this signature would necessarily apply to any newly encountered humanoid species.
Last edited: