I happen to be one of those who LOVES TMP. However, the studio came to view TMP as a failed project and seem to lay all of the blame for the film's "failings" at the feet of Gene Roddenberry, and as such basically excluded him almost entirely from all future films.
But my question is, is how much creative control did Roddenberry actually have over TMP? Was it a "George Lucas/Star Wars prequels" type scenario where Roddenberry had full creative control, and thus full accountability, or is it less clear than that and Roddenberry was simply a scapecoat?
I understand that some of Gene's ideas were sometimes "out there", and that he was rather stubborn and difficult at times to work with, so was the perceived failure of TMP simply a convenient excuse for the studio to ditch him, or did he really helm the project and thus was accountable for its (perceived) flaws?
But my question is, is how much creative control did Roddenberry actually have over TMP? Was it a "George Lucas/Star Wars prequels" type scenario where Roddenberry had full creative control, and thus full accountability, or is it less clear than that and Roddenberry was simply a scapecoat?
I understand that some of Gene's ideas were sometimes "out there", and that he was rather stubborn and difficult at times to work with, so was the perceived failure of TMP simply a convenient excuse for the studio to ditch him, or did he really helm the project and thus was accountable for its (perceived) flaws?