• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How many children could Voyager equitably support?

Guy Gardener

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
The lack of children has always puzzled me since I seem to notice that most people in the modern world don't want their children and never asked for them in the first place (No, no, you're the exception.), which has me believe that the contraceptive measures used on Voyager must have been so magnificent that every "unpregnancy" was completely planned... But what if there were accidents and enough intentional births that Voyagers resources began to "stretch"?

With as many as 70 breeding pairs, a genial preference for monogamy, coupled with a healthy sexdrive, and considerings toward family building as well as crew replacement, you'd have to assume that the breeding pairs would be churning out at least 3 dozen kids per annum for the first couple years before the terror of raising children completely sours the relative pleasure of an orgasm relents the baby output a little... But with those "conservative" figures, even if the breeding pairs remain static, by the 4th or 5th season the toddlers and preschoolers would be outnumbering the adults...

If it wasn't for a holodeck being retrofitted into a kindergarten, and the other into a primary school, which were both muled by a holographic support staff, you would have to wonder what a total lack of humanity in the raising of these "little humans" (and others) would mean for their emotional development (Hells, it was good enough for Seven of Nine?) that worried parents wouldn't insist that holograms run the ship instead and that they raise the childrenif we must place more realistic priorities on these things?

Janeway could lose half her crew or more and still have to supply resources to feed, clothe and nurture an extra few hundred "people" as the years rolled by that she might have had to eventually put "limits" on reproduction to safegurad those already in her care from going without?

How many mewling brats do you think it would have taken to reach Voyagers fulcrum demoting the lot of them into some third world like status and how many seasons/yarns/cycles would it have taken the crew to reach this type of population collapse?
 
In the Season 7 episode "Friendship One", they considered how long it would take to resettle all the surviors left on the planet. According to MA, it was 5500 survivors and would take 17 trips. That would be 323 aliens per trip, plus the ~150 person crew, or at least some portion of it.

So there's one possible upper bound for the number of people the ship could take (although each trip was of limited duration—they might not have been able to hold that many forever).

Another data point would be "Prophecy", the episode with the Klingon generational ship, but I don't remember and couldn't lookup how many Klingons were on board during that.
 
Are you not the poster who raised great concern that the 500 talaxians in Homestead were to few in number to prevent inbreeding?

Voyager is far far smaller. Also I can't believe that any Intreprid class would be able to maintain warp 9 for 70 straight years to cross the galaxy.

They needed to get home in one generation or go extinct.
 
Yup. In battlestar they were saying that 50,000 was too few for the species to continue in the beginning and then over the next 4 years they lost a few more thousand.

I think Voyager's crew would make it 3 or four generations before cousins started kissing and Janeway had to begin chemically castrating the teens.

This is more of an ecology problem, would they choke on their own "waste" before they made it half way home?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top