• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How do you want the regeneration limit dealt with?

How do you want the regeneration issue sorted?

  • I think there should be a story in which the Doctor gets more regenerations.

    Votes: 29 35.8%
  • I think the issue should be dismissed with a glib line or two.

    Votes: 20 24.7%
  • I think the issue should be ignored completely, and the regenerations should just carry on.

    Votes: 18 22.2%
  • I think the show should end with the death of the Thirteenth Doctor.

    Votes: 14 17.3%

  • Total voters
    81

Bones2

Commodore
Commodore
Right, so there is a topic about it (or rather, more specifically about the SJA line), but I think a poll would be interesting to gauge opinion. Personally, I don't see why anyone wouldn't want a story to deal with it. There is potential for a good one in there, and to just dismiss the issue or ignore it strikes me as disrespectful to the history of the show and the writers that came before. As for the show ending with the 13th Doctor, there's integrity in that, but it's not realistic if the show continues to be profitable - and as a fan, I don't want the show to end, especially with all the potential yet to be fully realised in new Who.

Of course, I'd love 10 or 20 years of Matt Smith, perhaps rendering the issue moot.
 
I'm not sure why a poll is needed. There WILL be a story in which The Doctor gains more regenerations.

The RTD line in SJA was a joke.
 
Mmm, but out of that discussion it seemed that some people think we'd be better off if it was ignored or dismissed rather than dealt with in a story. I can't understand that line of thinking myself, but wouldn't mind seeing how widespread it is.
 
I frankly don't really care how it is dealt with. I'm sure there will be some future story where it will become a prominent facet of the series, perhaps even if the BBC sees ratings failure and wants to end the franchise it will be used by that series showrunners, I dunno. While it has been an important fixture of the Whoverse, I tend to think fans make too much of a big deal about it.
 
where's the option for 'i don't give a rat's ass and think everyone's making too damn much of a fuss'?
"I think the issue should be ignored completely, and the regenerations should just carry on."

Or, alternatively, not posting.




























:borg:
 
Anyone voting for B or C is actually mental. As if there isn't the opportunity for an awesome story involving regenerations, Time Lords, maybe even the Eye of Harmony or something.

To dismiss the thing out of hand reeks of lack of imagination and creativity.
 
Anyone voting for B or C is actually mental. As if there isn't the opportunity for an awesome story involving regenerations, Time Lords, maybe even the Eye of Harmony or something.

To dismiss the thing out of hand reeks of lack of imagination and creativity.
Yeah. Also, I imagine that anyone who votes for B or C is primarily a new Who fan first rather than a classic fan. Just an inkling.
 
^Or someone who just consistently goes against the grain of the majority in an effort to be seen and heard, rather than having anything positive to offer... :shrug:
 
I really enjoy the old show... still don't care about the regeneration limit. Doctor Who is an extremely entertaining show with a completely uninteresting lore. They need to forget about the lore and tell fun stories about the Doctor and the people he meets.
 
^They already do that, thirteen weeks a year. Taking a single story to deal with lore is perfectly valid in that ratio...
 
Actually, I was thinking they could have taken care of this question when Rose took in the energy from the TARDIS and brought Captain Jack back to life. The same energy could have reset The Doctor #9's regenerations and he could have started over and it forced him into his next regeneration, #10 Tennant.
 
^Or someone who just consistently goes against the grain of the majority in an effort to be seen and heard, rather than having anything positive to offer... :shrug:


Or, you know, they could have an opinion that's just different that yours and it's not about being seen and heard...
 
Anyone voting for B or C is actually mental. As if there isn't the opportunity for an awesome story involving regenerations, Time Lords, maybe even the Eye of Harmony or something.

To dismiss the thing out of hand reeks of lack of imagination and creativity.
Yeah. Also, I imagine that anyone who votes for B or C is primarily a new Who fan first rather than a classic fan. Just an inkling.

Wow. Judgmental much?

I've been watching the show since about 1980. I guess that makes me a newer fan than many. I voted B, even though the "glib" word choice made it a pretty loaded option, because I don't really like it when the show goes into Timelordy stuff. It all ends up being self-contradictory, anyway. Are we going to be faithful to what we saw in War Games? Or The Three Doctors? Deadly Assassin? Arc of Infinity?

Regenerations and the Eye of Harmony don't really matter to me. If they can write an interesting story around them, fine, but if not, I'm not going to lose sleep over them just saying that thanks to the Time War he's got 100 regenerations or something.

It's not that I don't like the show's lore--I go positively squee every time they show a clip of Hartnell (had an absolute freakout at that scene at the end of The Eleventh Hour). I'd love to see them do a story with Ian or Barbara (especially if they make it to the 50-year mark). To an extent, Tom Baker will always be, on an emotional level, "my" doctor. But I just don't get too excited about the Time Lords. So my vote stays for B.
 
Of course, I'd love 10 or 20 years of Matt Smith, perhaps rendering the issue moot.
:)
I voted for the fourth option, as it most closely approximates my current wishes.
Though the boy Smith is great as the Doctor, the show would probably suffer from any one actor becoming synonymous with the role for very long.
It's tempting to say "Just establish that he was given more regens in the Time War" or somesuch. However, there is a certain attraction to sticking to the limit. Almost every story since the show began in 1963 has involved death in some way; it's as if the Grim Reaper is a nodding acquaintance of the Doctor. There comes a time when maybe they should stop dancing around each other and just get it on.;)
On a more serious note, I think that Doctor Who has entered the public consciousness in the same way as Robin Hood or Arthurian Legend. In the case of the latter there are conflicting versions of the popular myth; eg Excalibur being the "sword in the stone" versus the "lady in the lake" origin. By the same token, why not end Doctor Who and have a new version of the mythology replace it at some stage? The time may be approaching when even the show's current incarnation may seem quaintly anachronistic. In the last few years we've seen a "remote locking" facility for the TARDIS and even the ability to open the doors with a snap of the fingers. With the advent of controllerless interaction such as with the Kinect, will the idea of a console become outdated in the next ten or so years? Will modern technology begin to catch up with the Doctor's ability to regenerate? It could be that a "final incarnation", if handled properly, will be a means of drawing a line under the show's history to date. This being Doctor Who, the only barrier to a future revival would probably be the extinction of popular culture itself.
 
Anyone voting for B or C is actually mental. As if there isn't the opportunity for an awesome story involving regenerations, Time Lords, maybe even the Eye of Harmony or something.

To dismiss the thing out of hand reeks of lack of imagination and creativity.

And have another idiotic three part episode where the hilarious in-joke is explained away thus ruining one of the best episodes of Star Trek due to anal fans who take everything too god damn seriously? Yeah, I'll keep my vote with "make fun of it".

It's a TV show. We don't need an explanation for a throwaway line over three decades ago. Just chill out and enjoy the ride.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top