• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hollywood's Biggest Sequels Year: Hollywood's Biggest Ever Year

Gaith

Vice Admiral
Admiral
Take it away, AV Club:

The ideological argument against the movie industry’s relentless franchising and subjugation of story to spectacle has been answered with the big, fat raspberry of Hollywood’s biggest summer ever, with Labor Day weekend totals expected to push the season’s box-office grosses to a record high. And what’s more, they got there without having to bother with any of those “original ideas” some people are always grousing about: “For the first time ever, the top five pics of summer were all sequels, each crossing the $200 million mark to power the Stateside B.O. to $4.24 billion as of Wednesday,” according to Variety, who also notes that the top three films of the season—Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2, Transformers: Dark Of The Moon, and Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides—all crossed the $1 billion mark worldwide, despite the fact that everyone pretended like they’d never go see those last two, not this time. Add in the hauls of The Hangover Part II and Cars 2, and you can see why studio executives probably indulge complaints about sequels with a patronizing smile, like, “Oh, sure, the people are tired of being sold the same old junk over and over. I guess that’s why there are over 32,000 McDonald’s locations worldwide, huh?” And then they have a big old smirk and maybe go for a massage.


This all reminds me of a post I made around this time last year, blaming the weak Summer 2010 box-office on too few sequels... (diddle-doo, diddle-doo flashback chimes)


I agree that it's been a weak year, and the reason? Too few sequels. No Bond, no Trek, and only one superhero installment, though it was awesome.

In fact, most of the year's biggest movies have been flicks designed to lead to sequels:

How to Train Your Dragon
Despicable Me
The Karate Kid
Clash of the Titans
The Last Airbender
Salt
Robin Hood
The Expendables
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
The A-Team
The Sorcerer's Apprentice
Predators
Kick-Ass
Machete
Jonah Hex

Pirahana 3D

Total: at least 17


And how many sequels did we get?

Toy Story 3
Iron Man 2
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
Shrek Forever After
Sex and the City 2
Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore
Step Up 3-D
Resident Evil 4

Total: 8

In other words, only three sequels not primarily aimed at kids or women. Oh, two of those were two of the top-grossing three movies of the year so far. Coincidence, I'm sure...


That just doesn't cut it these days, Hollywood. When we see heroes we like and enjoy, we want to see them again and again. Where's Hobbit, Bond, XXX, Indy, Hulk, Spidey, Fantastic Four, Jurassic Park, Star Wars, Mummy, Pirates, etc.? Now, I know where all these are; it's a rhetorical question. But since non-sequel movies by definition stand alone, it's far easier to mark the passing of summers and years by franchise installments. And for whatever reason, Hollywood failed to bring the sequels this year, which, IMO, is a big, maybe even the primary reason, why this year has seemed so "meh" thus far.


Well, now, looks as though I was right! Sequels and franchise movies give the audience more of what they seem to like and make tons of moolah. The six biggest movies of the year so far are all sequels, and if you count Thor and Cap as franchise/sequel movies, then the only one-off (so far) in the top twelve is Bridesmaids (#9).

The bottom line? Don't worry, sequel and franchise fans: we'll be getting loads more intertextual flicks for years to come! :bolian: :p
 
Originality doesn't pay. Not in movies, not in TV. Regardless, I'm grateful for the foolish souls who persist in making original movies so that I have something to watch other than the franchises. Didn't see this summer's top three movies, and won't see em on DVD either.

And it's not like I turn my nose haughtily up at a well-made popcorn flick like Captain America or Star Trek XI - both of which are more prequel than sequel. Two other prequels, Rise of the Planet of the Apes and X-Men: First Class were among the most critically lauded of the summer. Does that mean Hollywood should focus on developing new franchises and rebooting old ones? They weren't the biggest money makers but they were all solid hits, without needing to be crap.

And do you really want more Star Wars movies? That would be great, assuming that we can get George Lucas to sign a contract in blood stating that, upon peril of his immortal soul, he will henceforth not film the first draft of any script, and will seek approval of a committee of competent, non-ass-kissing professionals for any important directing, writing or casting decisions he makes in the future.

And he is never allowed to use the word "no" in any script, in any form, ever again.
 
Part of the problem is Hollywood mega-budgets. I'm not a film snob, if something looks like it has a huge budget and has a decently cut trailer I am going to want to go see it on the big screen.

But more and more Hollywood is only throwing its biggest budgets behind existing properties. Would I be right in guessing that the three top grossing movies of this summer were also the biggest budgeted projects of the summer? With the possible exception of Green Lantern which had all sorts of problems, I would guess I'm right.

Success stories like Inception prove that original big budget movies can work and be successful, Hollywood is just too financially conservative and risk averse to try many of them.
 
And do you really want more Star Wars movies?
Sure, why not? If they make one and I don't like the sound of it, I'll just ignore it like I did the Clone Wars movie and ongoing series. Besides, any future SW movies would almost certainly be far more removed from the OT than the PT, and could hardly be any worse than the PT. And, all things being equal, I'd rather ILM spent its talent-power on something Star Wars-y than yet more Transformers dreck. Bring on some Tales from the Jedi Archives and/or Tales of the Bounty Hunters! :p
 
Ok fine, I'd roll the dice on another Star Wars movie (live action) especially if Dave Filoni were involved. It's not like Lucas is doing anything else movie-wise that would be more worthwhile.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top