Greatest work of scholarship?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by cultcross, Aug 8, 2007.

  1. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    I'm sure this has been done before, so apologies,
    But what, in your opinion, is the greatest scholarly work ever produced?
    Is it Newton's Principia, the laying down of the mathematical basis of centuries of physical science?
    Darwin's Origin of Species, which brought a revolution in Biology in its wake?
    The Oxford English Dictionary, a collection of over 800,000 English words with their entire known histories and etymologies?
    Or something completely different?

    I'm interested to know what you consider to be the greatest piece of scholarship ever published...
     
  2. Balthier the Great

    Balthier the Great Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    probably Prinipia. I love Biology, but Physics is more useful.
     
  3. Neopeius

    Neopeius Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Location:
    55 years ago
    How about the Almagest?

    Or The Incoherence of Incoherence? If you're Scholastically minded..
     
  4. Captain Intrepid

    Captain Intrepid Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2002
    Location:
    Formerly TheMacMan
    Wikipedia.





























    (just kidding!)
     
  5. Asbo Zaprudder

    Asbo Zaprudder Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Location:
    Rishi's Sad Madhouse
    Define "greatest".
     
  6. RaulMacca

    RaulMacca Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2001
    Location:
    Scotland
    The way I see it the Greatest work of scholarship very very likely came from the classic age of greece so I'd frankly dismiss work by anyone other than socrates, plato, Aristotle and co, but as for what one work stood out I don't really know enough about any of the great greeks to seperate their work, it all seems to be some sort of interconnected evolution of ideas rather than someone being hit on the head with an apple ideas.
     
  7. Ariadne

    Ariadne Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    If Einstein's four papers from 1905 had been published in one work of scholarship, I'd vote for them.

    Given that they weren't, Principia is probably the winner, at least in western scholarship. (There were probably a few in the Middle East during the European Dark Ages that would give it a run for it's money, though).
     
  8. Cooter Brown

    Cooter Brown Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2001
    Location:
    Tejas
    It's more than a little tough to say. You'd certainly have to break it down by field.

    As a biologist, my vote would go to Darwin's On the origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, with honorable mentions to Robert Hooke's Micrographia, Linnaeus' Systema Naturae, Rudolf Virchow’s Die Cellularpathologie, Edmund Wilson's The Cell in Development and Heredity, and Ernst Mayr's Systematics and the Origin of Species.

    For other sciences, many great works have already been listed. There are a whole mess of papers published in Annalen der Physik around the turn of the last century that deserve mention. Galileo's Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo (Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems) and Discorsi e Dimostrazioni Matematiche, intorno a due nuove scienze (Discourse on the Two New Sciences) as well as Maxwell's A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field deserve nominations as well.

    Deuterostome is correct. You should define greatest. Many of our well-known works of science in centuries past were written by men of means over the course of several years, and these men had very little in the way of competition in their fields. Since the dawn of the 20th century, our most remarkable breakthroughs have usually been collaborative (or competitive) efforts, coming in spurts, with many contributors. Take plate tectonics as an example. It is one of the greatest scientific revolutions in history, as significant to geology as Darwin's was to biology. To whom do we give the credit, though? Wegner had the idea more than 80 years ago, but the evidence that made it a theory came in a flurry of dozens of papers from dozens of different authors in just a few years.

    The old science came in novel form. Today's science comes to us as individual chapters, from many different authors, and with many revisions. No matter how sarcastically it may have been delivered, Newton's use of the "shoulders of giants" metaphor is (and has always been) a good one. Today, it's easier for us to see who has the shoulders, but it doesn't make today's science any less remarkable.
     
  9. Twilight

    Twilight Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    "Isophotal Structure and Dust Distribution in Radio-Loud Elliptical Galaxies", of course :D :p

    It'll be in the Sept. 1st Astrophysical Journal issue. Prepare to be AMAZED :eek:


    Seriously, though, I'd vote for Einstein's 1905 papers.
     
  10. Neopeius

    Neopeius Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Location:
    55 years ago
    Is your last name Tremblay, by any chance?
     
  11. Twilight

    Twilight Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Don't tell anyone! :eek:
     
  12. Daedalus12

    Daedalus12 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Location:
    Transatlantic Flights
    The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. When people mention the word scholarship I don't usually think of science/math literature.