This is a pretty good article on Forbes about Star Trek Discovery and CBS All Access. Even if you don't agree with it, it's an interesting read.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottm...ces-pay-for-star-trek-discovery/#49bbe5884e94
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottm...ces-pay-for-star-trek-discovery/#49bbe5884e94
You can argue that CBS should have aired this show on their standard free broadcast stations, but they didn’t. I get the opposition to paying a monthly fee to subscribe to a channel that offers a single show that entices you, even if I imagine that plenty of folks have done just that for Game of Thrones or Homeland or The Handmaid’s Tale. But, if you like Star Trek Discovery, or at least you’re enough of a fan of the brand or the folks in front-of-or-behind the camera, you might want to consider paying for the immediate access. If we don’t pay for the art we enjoy there will be no money to create the art we crave.
...
Moreover, folks who are paying $6-$10 per month to subscribe to CBS All Access aren’t paying to watch Star Trek: Discovery. They are paying to watch Star Trek: Discovery at the first possible moment that it is available. Those wanting to wait until it becomes available on a VOD outlet or physical media are absolutely free to do so. But if you want it right now, you got to pay up accordingly. This is no different than folks upset that Game of Thrones isn’t available right now, even on a pay-per-episode basis, for those who don’t subscribe to HBO. In an era when TV shows are released on DVD and VOD after airing, subscribers are paying primarily for immediate access.