• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Fixing the films....

Warped9

Admiral
Admiral
What would you have done differently if you could go back and somehow influence some of the creative decisions?

If I accept certain constraints here are some thoughts.


TMP

Going back to revisit an idea already used in TOS doesn’t necessarily have to be a deal breaker, but I find it hard to imagine they couldn’t have thought of something else. Maybe the story “Kitumba” that had originally been slated for the now aborted Phase II could have been fleshed out into a full two-hour film?

So if I go with the story we got how could I have made it better? There are only three major things that come to mind.

There are aspects of TMP that while they worked to an extent I think they could have benefited from tweaking. As much as I really enjoyed Kirk’s tour of the newly refit Enterprise I would consider tightening this up just a bit. It’s not a huge thing, but if I could save maybe a minute of screen time I could use more effectively somewhere else then so be it. The same applies yet even more so to the Vger flyover. This is a sequence that really needed to be tightened up and enhanced with a few added visual instances of seeing the Enterprise from the outside as it made its way. As it is the only shots we have of the Enterprise passing over Vger are a couple of long shots that while conveying Vger’s size they are in themselves not that dynamic.

In terms of design my only real quibble is with costuming. If TMP had been the very first thing we’d ever seen of the Star Trek universe I’d be more impressed, but given what we were already familiar with from TOS I think they could have done better. I do applaud the effort to look futuristic and distinct from contemporary wear, but it looked a bit too casual and the colours were too muted. It made the characters appear to blend in too much with the background. The uniforms needed more colour and a sharper looking design. Not brighter colour so much as richer colour. And I would have added some bits of colour into some of the sets as well. Overall I think it would have given the film an added touch of warmth. In the very least I would have promptly dropped the one-piece uniform--that was simply embarrassing.

The final thing I would have done was punch up the script. I’d have asked Robert Wise to reflect more on a film he directed some twenty years earlier, Run Silent, Run Deep. I think more could have been made of Decker’s resentment at being displaced and explored some of the friction between crew members loyal to Decker and those loyal to Kirk. Decker’s resentment might also have given us a glimpse of Earth’s “new humanity” (referenced in GR’s novelization of TMP) and possibly influenced Decker’s view of Kirk. We might also have seen a moment where Decker realizes Kirk was indeed the better man for the job after all. The whole key to this is to add more character drama amidst the process of trying to unravel what Vger is and what it wants.


TWOK

One cannot fault the energy and pacing of TWOK. But there are things about it that bug me and I wish they hadn’t done or done differently. If I accept the same idea of revisiting the character of Khan then what else could be changed?

The first thing I’d jettison is the entire business of the Enterprise being a cadet training ship. Gone. You could keep the training scenario particularly with Saavik, but it could take place in a simulator aboard ship. Or in an even more forward thinking idea it could have been a holodeck like simulator given that the holodeck idea actually goes all the way back to TOS even though it was never used (it was seen in TAS).

This leads to TWOK (a less revealing title would be nice) being more of a followup to TMP. Instead of TWOK being set about a decade after TMP it could be only two years or so and more consistent with the passage of time in the real world. This would mean the Enterprise is embarked in the midst of another voyage of exploration as was teased at the end of TMP.

There are a lot of coincidences in Trek so having the Enterprise responding to a distress call from Carol Marcus on Regula One isn’t a big deal. Kirk could also have been privy enough while at Starfleet Headquarters to know enough about Genesis to decently inform Spock and McCoy as to the nature of the project.

And from that point the story could proceed not much differently than what we saw other than a few minor tweaks to try covering some of the more naughty logic flaws.

Design wise if we assume the revamped uniform designs from a “fixed” TMP still work then we could forego the awful maroon outfits introduced in TWOK. That and toning down Nick Meyer’s heavy handed naval flavouring.


TSFS

Fixing this would depend a great deal on where things were left at the end of TWOK and how things unfolded in the real world.

If we still killed off Spock in TWOK then what happens next depends upon Leonard Nimoy. Does he or doesn’t he want to return? Originally he did want to return so if Spock were still killed off then Spock would have to be resurrected. If he didn’t want to return then you’re simply writing a completely new and unrelated story. What that could be in 1984 is anyone’s guess. The same would apply if Nimoy had opted they not kill Spock in TWOK.

If we go with Spock still dead and needing to be resurrected then we’re left basically finessing the story we got. The Enterprise pulls into a Starbase drydock in need of repair and McCoy’s strange behaviour has his friends worried. Meanwhile we become aware that Genesis has become a political hot potato and the Mutara sector is made a restricted area of space under investigation. This news comes on the heels of learning what McCoy’s problem is and what needs to be done to fix it. Kirk tries to get permission to go into the Mutura sector, but Starfleet isn’t buying any of it…so Kirk is going anyway. And the familiar group of Enterprise crew members opt to join Kirk.

Here is where we take a more drastic turn. Kirk and company defying Starfleet is one thing, but taking a full-up starship loaded with possibly quite a few unwillingly personnel is begging for trouble. If the Enterprise had been more fully manned when it encountered Kruge’s BoP then it would have been a much more one-sided affair—Kruge would have been toast. Seems to me Kirk would have had an easier time commandeering a smaller ship to go to Genesis (and later still be charged with disobeying orders and stealing Federation property). I guess I’m trying to find a way not having to destroy the Enterprise while still retaining the drama and tension of how these scenes were originally filmed.

Eventually they retrieve Spock and get him back to Vulcan for the ritual to resurrect Spock and save McCoy’s sanity. The ending of the story mightn’t be much different from what we saw originally. The question would be whether we want to end this on a cliffhanger as was done originally or do we want to set things right with our characters before the end credits?

The original ending was indeed one that made me smile and if at all possible I’d like to keep the essence of that scene. On the other hand I wouldn’t mind an ending with more finality with Sarek and/or someone else pulling strings to get Kirk and company exonerated somehow and put back on the Enterprise where they belong to finish repairing the ship and continuing their voyage in the next film.


TVH

Right off I don’t like this story. I wish they had done something else. And if they insisted on doing this I would have liked to have seen the some of the humour toned down and the whole thing given a little more weight like what we saw in “City On The Edge Of Forever.” The only thing I like about this story is the ending where Kirk and crew face the Federation Council, Spock’s closing scene with his father and the reveal of the new Enterprise.

If a way could be found to salvage those scenes in a new story or splice them onto the end of the previous film I’d be a happy guy. And instead of an Enterprise-A our heroes would be returned to the proper Enterprise (assuming we managed to not write it off in the previous film).


TFF

This is a film I consider something of a noble failure. It had its heart in the right place, but the execution leaves us wanting.

The whole ship as lemon thing would be gone along with the over-the-top humour. A lot of it wasn’t funny and it often made the characters look silly.

Set the story about a year or so after events in the previous film and the crew could indeed be on shore leave when they’re ordered to investigate a hostage crisis on Nimbus III. It would be nice if at some point it was explained why Sybok needs a starship when he had to have had one to end up on Nimbus III. As such if he can manipulate people as we eventually see then he didn’t need to go through all the nonsense on Nimbus to steal a Starfleet starship (or whoever came along first).

Yeah, this sort of thing happened in TOS, too, but the whole business of Sybok and a handful of followers managing to take the Enterprise (now supposedly fully manned) is ridiculous. As soon as Scotty sees what’s happening all he had to do was seal the flight deck and gas everyone to sleep. When Sybok wakes up he and his followers are in the brig. It would be better if a way could be found for Sybok to ingratiate himself amongst the crew in much the same way as a charismatic cult leader who also happens to have some telepathic tricks up his sleeve.

What this story reminds me of is TOS’ “The Way To Eden” and the execution of that story worked better than TFF.

What really hurts this story is a lot of sloppy writing and sloppy thinking. The essential heart of this story could have been salvaged with some smart rewriting and without losing any of the good stuff.


TUC

For me the fixes for this story would be largely in the way of tweaks. I would also tone down the "final nods" to what came before. And this final story could be set some several years after the events of the previous films.


GEN

Forget the paasing-the-baton exercise. Just do something else with TNG standing on its own and don't destroy the E-D. In fact I'd apply the same thinking to the other TNG films: do something else, please.
 
Last edited:
With regards t passage of time between TMP and TWOk, it might not have been feasible to only have a couple of years pass, bear in mind that over a decade had passed since TOS first aired. So the actors had gotten older sure only a couple of years passed between TMP and TWOK being made, but how people look can change in just a couple of years.

As for the destruction of the Ent-D, I have no issue with them destroying it that being said the manner in which they did was poorly done.
 
As for the destruction of the Ent-D, I have no issue with them destroying it that being said the manner in which they did was poorly done.
It was poorly done, but I'd still prefer to avoid losing the E-D given it seemed so copy-cat and I never liked the E-E.
 
TMP

I'd tighten the plot, dump the Spock and Kirk "preplots". Kirk and Spock are on the Enterprise. Decker is XO. Spock is SO. No false drama about Kirk taking the center seat. No getting the band back together, ( though I would miss McCoy's reserve activation clause line)

The Enterprise is on patrol, not at Earth or getting a refit, when the call comes about V'Ger. They head out to intercept it. Trouble is the Klingons are on the way too. ( More Mark Lenard as a Klingon) Some "pew pew" with the Klingon ship before it gets "eaten"

I'm split on dumping the Ilia sub-plots. Like a lot of subplots in the film they're GNDN. Oh well she and Decker are glorified redshirts, anyway.

Definitely change the uniforms. Darker colors and less 70s design. I like the short sleeve variant used by Kirk and Sulu, so I'd start there.

The ship. I like the new design but no ship porn tour or hand wave. It's the Enterprise.
 
What this story reminds me of is TOS’ “The Way To Eden” and the execution of that story worked better than TFF.

Gotta say, when "The Way to Eden" is better than your movie, you're in serious trouble. :)

That's like saying that a film suffers in comparison to "Spock's Brain" or "The Alternative Factor."

Moviing on .. . .

I love WOK, but I wish that Khan's followers had been represented by multiple races and ethnicities (as in "Space Seed") instead of inexplicably changing into blond Aryan types.
 
TMP

I'd tighten the plot, dump the Spock and Kirk "preplots". Kirk and Spock are on the Enterprise. Decker is XO. Spock is SO. No false drama about Kirk taking the center seat. No getting the band back together, ( though I would miss McCoy's reserve activation clause line)

The Enterprise is on patrol, not at Earth or getting a refit, when the call comes about V'Ger. They head out to intercept it. Trouble is the Klingons are on the way too. ( More Mark Lenard as a Klingon) Some "pew pew" with the Klingon ship before it gets "eaten"

I'm split on dumping the Ilia sub-plots. Like a lot of subplots in the film they're GNDN. Oh well she and Decker are glorified redshirts, anyway.

Definitely change the uniforms. Darker colors and less 70s design. I like the short sleeve variant used by Kirk and Sulu, so I'd start there.

The ship. I like the new design but no ship porn tour or hand wave. It's the Enterprise.
Not bad. I'd go for it. Regarding the ship's refit it could always be referred to off-hand in the past tense and leave it at that. Throughout the film you throw in a few nice beauty shots to show off the new design and everybody is happy.

I love WOK, but I wish that Khan's followers had been represented by multiple races and ethnicities (as in "Space Seed") instead of inexplicably changing into blond Aryan types.
Oops! I'd momentarily forgotten about that. Yeah, that would have to be addressed.
 
Last edited:
Star Trek V: Don't waste David Warner on a thankless character you pretty much forget about after the first act . . . .
 
Well Warner's character lasted longer in TFF than in TUC.

But Gorkon was more memorable . . . .

TVH is my second-favorite TREK movie, after WOK, and I'm trying to think of something I'd change, but I honestly can't.

Now, if they'd stuck to the original plan and included Eddie Murphy, that might be a different story . . . :)
 
Making the continued adventures of the Kirk Squadron make sense in-universe would have been nice.

Not sure how that would have worked and not strained credulity in another way, though.
 
TWOK:
Warped9, I don't think I'd change the time frame or that the Enterprise was a training ship. It was done to show how much time had passed, and was part of Kirk's story arc of growing older and dealing with entering the"back half" of his career. I think the passage of time is also critical to the idea that Khan is on the verge of insanity and bent on vengeance against Kirk because he's been stranded in a hell-hole for so long.
What I would change is how the Reliant finds Khan. Let's just say the way it happened shows they definitely weren't Starfleet's best and brightest on that ship. Perhaps Khan had a sensor still working that spotted the Reliant in the area, and he sent out a distress beacon. Chekov figures out who it is from and there's a debate about what to do. Given the disaster that happened and the distress they must be in, it's decided the humanitarian thing to do rescue them. Khan gets Chekov and Terrell to come down on a false pretense tied to the rescue, and it goes from there.

Gen:
If they're bound and determined to kill off Kirk, then get him on the Enterprise-D, first. After defeating Soran, have Kirk and Picard beam back to the Enterprise. The core breach happens, but the nexus is also closing in on the Enterprise as it prepares for its saucer separation from the doomed secondary hull. Data says they won't make it before the nexus hits. Kirk knows he can slow the nexus by firing photon torpedoes like Scotty did. He tells Picard, but Picard tells him the only working torpedo rooms are in the secondary hull. Picard says he'll go fire the torpedoes, but Kirk stops him and goes instead, saying Picard must stay on his bridge. Picard orders a transporter lock put onto Kirk to beam him to the saucer the moment the torpedoes are fired. Kirk is successful and the saucer escapes, but just before transport, the nexus hits the secondary hull and it explodes. The lock on Kirk was lost. Meanwhile, Data realizes they are careening towards Veridian III, and the movie goes on as it did. The ending leaves it open if Kirk was actually killed or back in the nexus.
 
As for the destruction of the Ent-D, I have no issue with them destroying it that being said the manner in which they did was poorly done.
It was poorly done, but I'd still prefer to avoid losing the E-D given it seemed so copy-cat and I never liked the E-E.

I hated the 'D' and was more than happy to see it go, whatever the merits of how it was done.

I wouldn't even try to fix some of the films. If it was up to me, Final Frontier and the TNG movies wouldn't have been made.

I'd save the rock climbing and camping scenes from FF and recut them as a 'crews holiday' short on the release of The Voyage Home.
 
All of the TOS films suffer from deplorable underuse of the ensemble cast (except for Chekov in TWOK). The surviving cast members must be jealous as hell about how much screen time their characters get in the Abrams films. It wouldn't have been hard to include the larger cast more. Other ensemble films seem to be able to do it. The TNG films were a little bit better but some characters, especially Crusher, get shortchanged in certain films.
Also regrettable is whomever decided not to have enough guts for the traitor to be Saavik. Reviewers would have gone nuts that Trek had the courage to make a popular character go dark.
It would have been nice, too if some budget had been spent to get film actors for the films to give them a more "feature" feel. Mantalban was terrific but, a TV actor. Chris Lloyd- TV actor. Laurence Luckinbill- TV actor. Plummer and Warner brought 10 times the presence to their scenes and you couldn't see them on TV (very often). The TNG films did better here, too. In those films, even minor roles were filled by film actors (Dina Meyer and Ron Perlman)
I also would have never, EVER used roman numerals after the movie names. Non fans would laugh at the ever-growing numbers after the titles and compare them to "Rocky" films. Numbers after a title stink of "cheap knock-off". Do Bond films use numbers? Even Planet of the Apes films, which actually WERE ever-cheaper knock-offs, were smart enough not to use numbers.
 
All of the TOS films suffer from deplorable underuse of the ensemble cast (except for Chekov in TWOK)... It wouldn't have been hard to include the larger cast more. Other ensemble films seem to be able to do it.
Can't really argue with that.

Also regrettable is whomever decided not to have enough guts for the traitor to be Saavik. Reviewers would have gone nuts that Trek had the courage to make a popular character go dark.
It would indeed have been gutsy.

It would have been nice, too if some budget had been spent to get film actors for the films to give them a more "feature" feel. Mantalban was terrific but, a TV actor. Chris Lloyd- TV actor. Laurence Luckinbill- TV actor. Plummer and Warner brought 10 times the presence to their scenes and you couldn't see them on TV (very often). The TNG films did better here, too. In those films, even minor roles were filled by film actors (Dina Meyer and Ron Perlman)
Well in fairness Montalban was a film actor before television. And in his case he was reprising a earlier role rather than playing a new one.

I also would have never, EVER used roman numerals after the movie names. Non fans would laugh at the ever-growing numbers after the titles and compare them to "Rocky" films. Numbers after a title stink of "cheap knock-off". Do Bond films use numbers? Even Planet of the Apes films, which actually WERE ever-cheaper knock-offs, were smart enough not to use numbers.
Agreed. TOS had something of tradition of somewhat poetic sounding episode titles. It would have been nice to have seen the films continue that and without the numerics added. The Motion Picture was rather lacklustre, but then the previous year (1978) we got Superman - The Movie. The Wrath of Khan, The Search For Spock and The Voyage Home aren't horrible, but they do give the main plot away right off. The Final Frontier and The Undiscovered Country each have a nice enough ring to them that also don't need any numerics added.
 
Agreed. TOS had something of tradition of somewhat poetic sounding episode titles. It would have been nice to have seen the films continue that and without the numerics added. The Motion Picture was rather lacklustre, but then the previous year (1978) we got Superman - The Movie. The Wrath of Khan, The Search For Spock and The Voyage Home aren't horrible, but they do give the main plot away right off. The Final Frontier and The Undiscovered Country each have a nice enough ring to them that also don't need any numerics added.

Apples and oranges. Episode titles are not marketing tools; they're just labels to distinguish one story from another. They're not slapped on posters and ads in order to hype an individual episode. But movie titles are intended to serve as advertising to some degree; they're meant to attract attention and lure people into the theaters, so there are different considerations at play.

Certainly, movie titles should, ideally, reflect the content and themes of the movie as well, but they're also about marketing.
 
Agreed. TOS had something of tradition of somewhat poetic sounding episode titles. It would have been nice to have seen the films continue that and without the numerics added. The Motion Picture was rather lacklustre, but then the previous year (1978) we got Superman - The Movie. The Wrath of Khan, The Search For Spock and The Voyage Home aren't horrible, but they do give the main plot away right off. The Final Frontier and The Undiscovered Country each have a nice enough ring to them that also don't need any numerics added.

Apples and oranges. Episode titles are not marketing tools; they're just labels to distinguish one story from another. They're not slapped on posters and ads in order to hype an individual episode. But movie titles are intended to serve as advertising to some degree; they're meant to attract attention and lure people into the theaters, so there are different considerations at play.

Certainly, movie titles should, ideally, reflect the content and themes of the movie as well, but they're also about marketing.
I don't think they needed to go the Bond route where James Bond is never mentioned in the titles. But something simple as Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country works fine without having to add the VI in there.
 
TMP - More Khan*
TWOK - Same amount of Khan*
TSFS - Slightly more Khan*
TVH - A moderate amount of Khan*
TFF - Definitely more Khan*
TUC - A smattering of Khan*


*As portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch :ouch:
 
In retrospect, The Voyage Home was probably not the greatest title since nobody but hardcore Trekkies remembers what that movie was actually called. To everyone else, it's simply "The One with the Whales."

Probably needed a more memorable title, not that it ultimately hurt the box office any.
 
Whoah boy, lets see...

TMP
Most of what I'd change others have been mentioned elsewhere (timing/pacing issues). You can't really drop the Spock pre-plot as he's the counterpoint to V'ger's point. Really, only Spock can teach V'ger what it needs to know conceptually, and vice-versa. Spock is the one that shows V'ger how to look beyond pure logic and reason. Fusing with Decker is the means by which V'ger does that. If I dropped any character plot it would be Decker/Illia. The romance is a bit of a C-plot standard anyways. Dropping it puts the focus back on the issue of V'ger and it's lesson where it belongs.

WoK
I like this one pretty much as is. The one thing I'd "fix" is using the TOS tri-colors for the jackets and jumpsuits (the white undershirts are fine).

SfS
There is one major fix/change I'd make to this one and that's reworking the editing to make it clear who knows what when in terms of Spock's status. As it is, why is Kirk so set on going back to Genesis, when the help that McCoy needs is on Vulcan? Moving the material about discovering Spock on Genesis forward gives Kirk a reason for being fixated on getting back to Genesis. I'd also shoot and use the dropped scene about Uhura going to the Vulcan embassy to request assylum. The rest of the film plays fine.

TVH
In one phrase: "Dial it back, guys!" The humor is too OOT and forced. Keep moments like "Did you see that?" "No, and neither did you!", and "Is that a lot?" where the humor is organic to the situation. The crew-involved humor should come from the innocence/naivte about the 20th century (Checkov and the cop, "I think he did a little too much LDS...") Re-edit the aquarium scene to drop all the Kirk facepalming stuff. Don't even show Spock in the tank until after the woman says "Maybe it's singing to that man...", which also alerts Kirk as to where Spock vanished to. Play it straight, not broadly (looking at you, McCoy and Scotty). Go back to the earlier draft where Plexcorp and the scientist are the ones that did/will invent transparent aluminum, and Scotty knows it (which is why he chose them). Drop the humor entirely from the Checkov/Feds scene. Neither the time nor the place for laughs. Drop the material with the old woman's new kidney but keep all the McCoy commentary on 20th century medicine. If I were making it today and not then in terms of time period, put in a scene with the doctors discussing billing instead of a case and have McCoy make a comment about their twisted priorities. (I might even go so far as to throw a "McCoy"-ism at them "You're doctors, not accountants!").

The last part of the film was fine.

Oh, one more addition: bring back the "Saavik is pregnant" scene. It gives her a little additional character bit here, and would add a bit of "oomph" to how I'd do TUC.

TFF
If you're going to do the story, do it right or don't do it. Don't be afraid of making a statement that might be controversial. I would make it clear though, that the "God"-alien of Sha'ka'ree was passing itself of as God, not that it was God (or Satan).

The rest of it is just a matter of giving the film the budget to really do the FX up right. (The film looked too cheap).

TUC
Most of the film needs little or no change. Bring back the Col West scene. BIG change: it's Saavik, not "Valeris". Makes her betrayal all the more personal to Spock (and would have explained Nimoy playing him so openly angered by it). Get rid of the "sign off" bit.

GEN
Strengthen the "what might have been" Picard subplot. Give Kirk a more "active" death by having him be the one to clamp the rocket at the very last second and die as a result of the explosion rather than simply falling off a collapsing bridge.

FC
Not many changes I'd make to this one.

INS
Another one I'd leave basically alone.

NEM
Drop the whole "clone" thing with Shinzon. He's Reman. Sela, not Donatra. Lore, not B-4.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top