• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Does Pike's Enterprise have a turbolift funhouse?

I'm not kidding. If the CGI stands out to me that's not a good sign.

I don't care about fan reactions. Popularity doesn't equal enjoyability. You want me to like it? Don't tell me it's popular.


I think the effects in TO is much cleaner and clearer then let's say STD or even SNW so far. The problem with the trek shows is everything is dark on the color scale for the cgi. Thry usually use darker tones and scenes to cover up poor cgi. In TO the ship is bright and white and the space scenes are nice and clear. It feels more trek like. Just my opinion.
 
I think the effects in TO is much cleaner and clearer then let's say STD or even SNW so far. The problem with the trek shows is everything is dark on the color scale for the cgi. Thry usually use darker tones and scenes to cover up poor cgi. In TO the ship is bright and white and the space scenes are nice and clear. It feels more trek like. Just my opinion.
See, the Orville feels extremely fake, like the way it swings around, and the overall feel. It doesn't have anything to it that I'm like "Oh, that's fun."

Current Trek has me gripped at least rather than waiting for it to be done or skipping through it.
 
See, the Orville feels extremely fake, like the way it swings around, and the overall feel. It doesn't have anything to it that I'm like "Oh, that's fun."

Current Trek has me gripped at least rather than waiting for it to be done or skipping through it.


I always think of those poor effects on Picard season 1. Those were so bad..
 
Last edited:
Those cut and paste ships as well as those weird flower things did. It all looked too computerized to me.
Mileage will vary. Orville flipping around looked too much like PT Yoda style lack of physics.

I literally will skip through Orville's cg sequences.
 
I think the effects in TO is much cleaner and clearer then let's say STD or even SNW so far. The problem with the trek shows is everything is dark on the color scale for the cgi. Thry usually use darker tones and scenes to cover up poor cgi. In TO the ship is bright and white and the space scenes are nice and clear. It feels more trek like. Just my opinion.
Orville is the kind of flowey bright generic "futuristic" that has been popular for a while now. JJ Trek and Hitchhikers both had it for instance. 32nd Disco has an abundance of it too and I just hate that style. Everything is the wrong kind of bright and all the ships look like aquatic life.
Other than needing the lights up a bit Disco s1 looked good and SNW would look amazing if they just toned down the torch style lighting.
 
Wwll its too bad that the majority of continuity and mistakes that are very hard to try and reconcile have come from kurtzmsk trek and filled up the mistakes cabinet. He singlehandedly made trek like any generic sci fi. He even made hand phasers operate like star wars laser blasters. The phaser has always been a iconic weapon and should fire a straight continuous beam.
Bwahahahaha!!!
:guffaw::lol::guffaw::lol::guffaw:

NOPE
 
Watch more TOS. Early TOS
KkYAs7N.jpg


WglMHsD.jpg

spock-amok-time.png


The best one, IMO.|

Once Nimoy solidified his portrayal as Spock, so many seemed to take that as all Vulcans are emotionless and never laugh or smile.
 
spock-amok-time.png


The best one, IMO.|

Once Nimoy solidified his portrayal as Spock, so many seemed to take that as all Vulcans are emotionless and never laugh or smile.
They do occasionally. Pon Farr brings emotion. Spock is also half human so it's natural that he might be more prone to a occasional emotion than a full Vulcan.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top