• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Disney to release X-Men TAS

The Fox X-Men series had a total of 76 episodes released over five broadcast seasons. The season lengths were:

S1: 13 episodes
S2: 13
S3: 19
S4: 17
S5: 14

However, as stated above, the episode "No Mutant is an Island" was actually meant to air as part of season 3, which would've made that 20 episodes and S5 13 episodes.
 
Cool. I remember watching this show as a wee one. It was a good show and my first introduction into arc storytelling.

However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.
 
The Fox X-Men series had a total of 76 episodes released over five broadcast seasons. The season lengths were:

S1: 13 episodes
S2: 13
S3: 19
S4: 17
S5: 14

However, as stated above, the episode "No Mutant is an Island" was actually meant to air as part of season 3, which would've made that 20 episodes and S5 13 episodes.

Wow with their being a good solid 5 seasons it seems even more of a shame not to release them as season sets! I could see if there were only 2 or 3 seasons they may want to spread it out longer but alot of shows never made it as far as 5 seasons and they still have season sets, so I dont see why this show cant have season sets!
 
However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.

It and the '90s Spider-Man were the shows that made me a fan of Marvel superheroes by revealing to me how sophisticated and complex their storylines were. Sure, it had some corny elements, but so did the comics. And I didn't watch it as a kid, but as an adult.

As for the voice acting, I thought it was good overall. Sure, the style of it was somewhat melodramatic, but there were some good people in the cast, like Lenore Zann as Rogue, David Hemblen as Magneto, and John Colicos as Apokolips. I particularly liked Cal Dodd's Wolverine, which I consider definitive to this day. It took him a while to get the hang of it; in the first season, his Wolverine often sounded kind of like Popeye. But once he settled into the character, he did a great job, giving a rich, nuanced, impassioned performance with impressive emotional range. I've never heard (or seen -- yes, I'm looking at you, Hugh Jackman) a version of Wolverine that more effectively evoked the ferocity and inner turmoil of the character.
 
Cool. I remember watching this show as a wee one. It was a good show and my first introduction into arc storytelling.

However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.

As for the voice acting, my friends and I have made a joke out of Cyclops yelling "Jean!"
 
However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.

It and the '90s Spider-Man were the shows that made me a fan of Marvel superheroes by revealing to me how sophisticated and complex their storylines were. Sure, it had some corny elements, but so did the comics. And I didn't watch it as a kid, but as an adult.

As for the voice acting, I thought it was good overall. Sure, the style of it was somewhat melodramatic, but there were some good people in the cast, like Lenore Zann as Rogue, David Hemblen as Magneto, and John Colicos as Apokolips. I particularly liked Cal Dodd's Wolverine, which I consider definitive to this day. It took him a while to get the hang of it; in the first season, his Wolverine often sounded kind of like Popeye. But once he settled into the character, he did a great job, giving a rich, nuanced, impassioned performance with impressive emotional range. I've never heard (or seen -- yes, I'm looking at you, Hugh Jackman) a version of Wolverine that more effectively evoked the ferocity and inner turmoil of the character.

What Christopher said. ;)

I've never noticed first season Wolverine sounded like Popeye before... but he does.

Am I the only one that wished the first X-movie had been a combination of the first few episodes of the show?
 
I'd love to have this series on DVD. $24 for a two disc set is expensive though, unless it's double-sided/double-layered.

What??? Expensive? Sure it's $24 SRP but it'll probably sell for $16.98. And for 2-disc sets, that usually means 13 or so episodes. The first two sesasons of the X-Men show were 13 episodes a piece, so this could be the first two seasons, but labeled as Volumes because the final three seasons had odd-ball number of episodes and they could be doing this like WB did with Batman:TAS.
 
Cool. I remember watching this show as a wee one. It was a good show and my first introduction into arc storytelling.

However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.
I agree.
I find much of the animation compared to today as rather sloppy with prespective often thrown out the window. It's mostly because Mavel chose to focus on detail which doesn't often work well with scene after scene of hand drawn animation.

Wolverine and the X-Men is a far superior.
 
Cool. I remember watching this show as a wee one. It was a good show and my first introduction into arc storytelling.

However, these days when I stumble upon an episode on one of those toon channels, I am reminded of how we idealize shows as a kid. It's actually not very good, the voice acting is cringe-worthy and its stories are actually surprisingly simple and much less complex/labyrinth than I remember. Still, it's all relative, it did a better job than most of the other sat morning cartoons at the time.
I agree.
I find much of the animation compared to today as rather sloppy with prespective often thrown out the window. It's mostly because Mavel chose to focus on detail which doesn't often work well with scene after scene of hand drawn animation.

Wolverine and the X-Men is a far superior.

Meh. To me, it's just more formulaic and sterile. Technically, the animation may be superior, but I still prefer the original, flaws and all. It's like comparing old Simpsons and new Simpsons.
 
I find much of the animation compared to today as rather sloppy with prespective often thrown out the window. It's mostly because Mavel chose to focus on detail which doesn't often work well with scene after scene of hand drawn animation.

Also because the animation was done by Akom, whose work was sloppy and jerky at the best of times, hideously crude at worst. But you're right -- the designers tried too hard to emulate the detailed look of comic-book characters, which made the characters difficult to animate smoothly because it was hard to get all those lines to shift perspective convincingly as a character moved. That's why most animation character design these days is stylized and relatively simple; it allows for more fluid movement and expression.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top