wrapping up the Borg storyline with such finality(within main continuity) was a disappointment for me. Borg stories are some of the best Trek books.
I think that reaction is completely subjective. You either like the Borg or you don't; you either want them to be used, or you don't.
Ultimately, that stems from the fact that the Borg are unlike any other STAR TREK antagonists. They aren't a culture, with different factions who have different perspectives; they aren't really characters, with full personalities and motivations; they can't be reasoned with or relied upon or trusted; there's no possibility of peaceful coexistence; and they are far, far too much more powerful than the Federation for our heroes to ever realistically be able to beat them.
The Borg aren't characters, in other words; they're monsters. And the thing about monsters is, at the end of the day, you either escape them, or you kill them. There's no in-between.
I would argue that the Federation had escaped the monster too many times for it to be believable that it would just keep escaping it -- and too many times for the monster to be scary or interesting anymore. The monster had to die. For you, stories about the monster still had a thrill to them. It's completely subjective.
er, I said that it was a disappointment "for me." Why did you have to belabor the point that it was my subjective opinion when I never indicated it was otherwise?
Well, my goal was to explore why I disagreed with your conclusion without coming across as combative. Apparently I failed at that.
Oh, and I also thought the "Borg origin"(what was this the fourth or fifth Borg origin we'd gotten in Trek literature?) was pretty cheesy.
I strongly disagree with this. I loved the idea that the Borg were born out of a desperate attempt to survive inevitable death, instead of being yet another lame sci-fi aesop about the evils of technology or what-have-you. I thought Mack did an amazing job describing the desolation of the arctic landscape, the absolute hopelessness of trying to survive in a land so hostile. I could feel the bitter cold of the landscape, and thought the ongoing panic of trying to find food and shelter when there was nothing, just absolutely nothing, was incredibly well-described. And the way that complete and utter panic, that absolute desolation, that inevitable death, could drive some of the characters to betray everything they believe in, to lose themselves in the name of survival... It was wonderfully well-done, I thought.