And once again we're seeing a remake of something that was built around a specific actor or character. No one went to see Death Wish or its sequels for the story or the violence. They went to see Bronson. Full stop.
Remaking Death Wish is as senseless as remaking Dirty Harry. You don't go to see a Dirty Harry movie for the story or the characters. You go to see Clint Eastwood and only Clint Eastwood saying things like "Do ya feel lucky, punk?" and describing how his gun is powerful enough to blow someone's head "clean off" and of course "Go ahead, make my day." The Die Hard movies are the Bruce Willis Show - even considering that they're based on a character created for a novel. When Willis stops making them, it will make no sense for them to be remade.
Had Stallone actually gone and made Death Wish that might have worked because it would have been built around Stallone's personality.
The fact the guy thinking of doing this is the guy behind the clueless remake of The A Team tells you something. The A Team was built around Mr. T, Dwight Schultz and George Peppard (no offence to Dirk Benedict fans, but Face was disposable enough they actually cast someone else initially you'll recall). The story was secondary and a comic book (hence the lack of killing). The A Team remake had no standout personalities, and made the mistake of going for realism (killing people, etc). And it didn't work.
Sometimes I think people who come up with remake ideas should be forced to write a 100-page essay on what made the original series or movie popular before they're handed the keys, because for every "Get Smart" remake that actually gets things right, there's an "I Spy" or "Wild Wild West" or "A Team" that drops the ball completely. Hence my lack of faith in Death Wish 2.0 being any good.
Alex