I'm certain we can find a precocious 8 year old to play him.what, no Wesley?
The continuance of the "JJverse" does not require Abrams to touch anything at this point, any more than the continuance of the Primeverse has required Roddenberry's involvement since at least back to when he passed away.It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
I'm not getting how another Abrams topic is once again in the General Trek section. Apparently he's everyone's favorite whipping boy on this forum. If one is gone and off to the movie section, shouldn't this one go too?
Whoever plays Picard should actually be French, and then we can all complain for years about his lack of a British accent.
How about Djimon Hounsou as Picard?
True he might be a little young (just 49), but he'd definitely be a dominant presence on the Bridge.
It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
Aye aye. No reason to recast a superb cast. Some of these filmmakers and fans have no original bone in their body.
It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
Aye aye. No reason to recast a superb cast. Some of these filmmakers and fans have no original bone in their body.
It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
Aye aye. No reason to recast a superb cast. Some of these filmmakers and fans have no original bone in their body.
Or we are more interested in being entertained than treating Star Trek like some religious relic.
It will never happen. After the next film, I doubt will see JJ touch Star Trek ever again and thank goodness!![]()
Aye aye. No reason to recast a superb cast. Some of these filmmakers and fans have no original bone in their body.
Theatre has been modifying, recasting and retelling stories since the dawn of time. And the TNG crew loved theatre...
Sure it did. Kirk became Picard and Riker. Spock became Data, Troi and Worf. McCoy became Crusher and Pulaski.How can you be entertained by an exact copy?
TNG didn't copy TOS - Stewart was Picard, not Kirk. Brent was Data, not Spock. DS9 didn't copy TOS, Voyager didn't copy TOS etc etc
And a recast TNG would tell "classic stories" a bit differently.And yeah, theater retells classic stories, a bit differently.
People are entertained by many things. Including new stories featuring old characters.People are entertained by amazing stories, new characters, new problems, new insights, the wow! factor, not cheap copies. People like Abrams want to make a quick dollar, they don't want to put the work in that is required to make something great. Imagine if Gene said in the 80's "Screw it, let's just redo TOS". We would miss out on a lot of good stuff and enjoyment from TNG characters which were completely different. But people like Gene didn't have a poor attitude and were true creators and legends.
How can you be entertained by an exact copy?
People are entertained by amazing stories, new characters, new problems, new insights, the wow! factor, not cheap copies. People like Abrams want to make a quick dollar, they don't want to put the work in that is required to make something great.
Imagine if Gene said in the 80's "Screw it, let's just redo TOS". We would miss out on a lot of good stuff and enjoyment from TNG characters which were completely different. But people like Gene didn't have a poor attitude and were true creators and legends.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.