Battlefield 3 confirmed

Discussion in 'Gaming' started by clint g, Jun 11, 2009.

  1. clint g

    clint g Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Location:
    No where
  2. firehawk12

    firehawk12 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Given that their focus is on Bad Company, I`m kind of wondering where BF3 is at now. I imagine it`ll be Frostbite, which means another game with destructable environments... maybe a lot of polish... but we`ll see.
     
  3. Jax

    Jax Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Location:
    The Universe.
    Great another Bug Ridden BF game that requires a full clip to actually kill someone. I'll stick to my Flashpoint 2 thanks, 2142 was bad enough.
     
  4. Emher

    Emher Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Location:
    Sweden, where the chefs roam
    Just give me Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 1943 this summer and I won't ever need BF3. I think they finally got it just right with Bad Company, I've had waaaaaaaaaaay more fun in that multiplayer then ever did in BF2.
     
  5. LutherSloan

    LutherSloan Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Location:
    Doing the Federation's dirty work
    I wish the original Bad Company had come out for PC, since it looked pretty cool. The good news is, BC2 WILL be out for PC.
     
  6. firehawk12

    firehawk12 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    I guess it depends if PC people care about the fact that it's limited to 24 players.
    Even 1943 on PC will have a cap limit and that's essentially a Frostbite engine game as well.

    I know people don't seem to care about having large games, but I love the idea of a constantly moving front. BF2 maps would be constantly in flux in a way that I never found in more box-like multiplayer shooters.