To this day, I still think it's the worst Star Trek title I'd ever read.
So this footage isn't really "remastered." It's AI-upscaled and 'enhanced,' which won't bring out any more detail than what was already in the source they used, presumably the blu-ray.
Kor
I've never been able to make out what Spock says after McCoy asks how bad the saucer has been compromised.
Funny, as I think TUD is one of the strongest stories and represents some of the best character for the TOS crew development since Spock's death. The Cold War / Chernobyl / Fall of Berlin wall parallel works well without being stupidly expositional or hammy.
Kirk realises some enemies might be his friends and some friends might be his enemies. Spock utters the famous line that logic is the beginning of understanding, not the end, before being brutally betrayed by his protege. Kirk finally accepts that he's getting old.
And the TOS saga closes by showing us that even two arch enemies might settle their differences in time. Real Roddenberry stuff.
But hey, I respect that you have your opinion. I just very much don't share it with you.
Spock: The key, please, Doctor. Time is short
[Cut to torpedo hitting ripping through Enterprise's's primary hull]
Spock: The hull has been compromised
McCoy: wonder how bad...
Well, Bones, if you were actually doing your job - in Sickbay - you might know....
Like the Hobbit trilogy, there's a good movie buried inside the bad one. TUC was a solid film, with a lot of potential to be more.I honestly tend to think that TUC, while admittedly fairly enjoyable, is also a rushed mess of contrivances, plot holes, and inconsistent tone. The core story is just fine (meaning, if you were to read the hypothetical 1-page treatment)...but the execution was far too sloppy and rushed for me to consider it "one of the strongest stories." The dialogue is laughable at times, with Meyer over-indulging in his love of classic literature to the point of it becoming tiresome and ridiculous (and perhaps a bit pretentious).
I also disagree that it best represents the TOS characters. Kirk is very out-of-character in the film, Spock even more so. The interplay is far too "winky at the camera" for me to take it too seriously.
And, while I don't give a crap about "Roddenberry Stuff" at all....I disagree that this is in line with "His Vision," as it portrays the Federation and Starfleet characters as painfully prejudiced and fearful in most cases, with several opting for war and violence rather than a chance at peace.
For me, it's a lower-tier TOS film and a mid-grade film in the overall franchise. I know that isn't a common opinion...but I stand by it.
Like the Hobbit trilogy, there's a good movie buried inside the bad one. TUC was a solid film, with a lot of potential to be more.
Indeed. A lot of times with Trek films I always feel like there is one small step from good to great. TUC had some small edits and additions that would do that. TWOK is the same way. TUC tops out because the character moments carry more weight for me, but that doesn't automatically mean there couldn't be improvements; just that the good outweighs the more ridiculous moments, like that translation scene.The one thing I would take out of TUC is the Klingon translation scene. Even Nichelle Nichols thought it was stupid that as communication officer and the Klingons were the Fed's longest enemies, that Uhura couldn't fluently speak Klingon. Plus, as a comedy scene it always falls flat for me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.