I just watched the episode in parenthesis last night and found it to be especially poignant. First of all for Kira Nerys, because she learned Dukat wasn't lying. Then obviously for Kira Meru having been torn away from her husband and children and her confliction at being in love with Dukat and missing Taban very badly (Leslie Hope did a great job with that, IMHO).
Being Filipino in descent, yet living in the US, I couldn't help but notice the parallels to our history in that episode and have them be especially poignant for me in both storytelling and in the history of my own race. I frequently read how the issue of comfort women is still a hot topic even sixty years after World War II in our expatriate newspapers.
As the grandson of a Filipino resistance fighter, I can say my Grandfather never targeted them the way the resistance did. And in fact quite a few of our people express sympathy for these women with the outcry at the Japanese attempts to deny such incidents occured.
I wonder why the Resistance viewed the comfort women as collaborators? It was obvious people like Basso Tromac should have been the targets, not innocent women dragged from husbands and families like the comfort women. Why focus hatred on women dragged from their homes when the hate should have been focused on men like Tromac. I hope his balls were cut off post the Occupation, if he even had them to begin with.
Any speculation why fellow Bajorans didn't view comfort women as fellow sufferers, who if you really look at it suffered just as much as they did (emotional and physical abuse, STDs, post-traumatic stress disorder for the luckier ones, and the very real fear of being thrown into labor camps)?
Regards,
Dingo
Being Filipino in descent, yet living in the US, I couldn't help but notice the parallels to our history in that episode and have them be especially poignant for me in both storytelling and in the history of my own race. I frequently read how the issue of comfort women is still a hot topic even sixty years after World War II in our expatriate newspapers.
As the grandson of a Filipino resistance fighter, I can say my Grandfather never targeted them the way the resistance did. And in fact quite a few of our people express sympathy for these women with the outcry at the Japanese attempts to deny such incidents occured.
I wonder why the Resistance viewed the comfort women as collaborators? It was obvious people like Basso Tromac should have been the targets, not innocent women dragged from husbands and families like the comfort women. Why focus hatred on women dragged from their homes when the hate should have been focused on men like Tromac. I hope his balls were cut off post the Occupation, if he even had them to begin with.
Any speculation why fellow Bajorans didn't view comfort women as fellow sufferers, who if you really look at it suffered just as much as they did (emotional and physical abuse, STDs, post-traumatic stress disorder for the luckier ones, and the very real fear of being thrown into labor camps)?
Regards,
Dingo