Serial number 85903535 - That is just part of the argument:
...The only possible similarity between Applicant's mark and cited registrations is the inclusion of the term "STARFIGHTER". If ever there was a word owned and paid for by the America people STARFIGHTER is it. First used by the U.S. Air Force in 1958 for the F-104 Starfighter jet aircraft, the term came to denote both the aircraft and its pilots and achieved a level of fame long before 1977 when the first Star Wars movie was released. The next major use of the term STARFIGHTER was in the 1984 movie, The Last Starfighter, which had a profound effect on the science fiction genre and the movie industry as a whole as the first use of CGI (Computer Generated Images). STARFIGHTER is not just descriptive; it is generic in nature, used throughout the science fiction and aviation communities around the world (see attached Evidence). The word/term STARFIGHTER, in any form, was never used in any of the six Star Wars movies. The cited registrant made 3 movies and waited 23 years before trying to register the mark as STAR WARS STARFIGHTER in August of 2000, US Reg. No. 2843398. The cited registrant is hoping that no one challenges their use of the Cited Marks as they attempt to gain an unfair business advantage over the rest of their industry by trademarking a generic word use by aviation enthusiasts and more science fiction aficionados everywhere than just the registrant’s own overzealous fans. The inclusion of the additional term COMMAND creates a dramatically different mark in visual appearance, sound of the marks, and the commercial impression created by the marks. Clearly the term COMMAND is of central significance in relation to the online story and the goods marketed and sold under the STARFIGHTER COMMAND Mark, further distinguishing Applicant's Mark...
