• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are the new Klingons supposed to be White Republicans?

I cant speak to what the creators have in their minds, but the Klingons are not a good stand in for US Republicans. There is a big difference between a warrior culture and support for 2nd Amendment gun rights as an added guarantee of safety and liberty. There are of course different Party factions with ideological differences. Social conservative, libertarian, center-right, nationalist, free traders and protections, pro-immigration vs. anti, etc. But I'm not sure we ever learned enough about Klingon politics beyond houses, rivals, and conflicts between them. Are there libertarian Klingons? What's their policy on immigration? Surely some people would choose to migrate there. What do Klingons believe in other than honor and house/clan/tribal loyalty? They seem to have had, at least originally a caste or fairly rigid class system. It was a big deal that Martok got as far as he did, vs aristocratic families like Kor's. But on a wide range of social and economic issues I don't know how much weve seen about the range of Klingon opinions.

Have they ever mentioned Klingon elections? How are council representatives chosen? They seem to represent houses/clans, not points of view, like Greens, Tories, Socialists, Libertarians, etc. Individual liberty and representative democracy don't appear to be in evidence, which most GOPers believe in .

As much as I love alot of individual Alien characters throughout the Trek series, Alien cultures have always been pretty paper thin in Trek, usually centering around 1 trait or ideal.
 
They are like the west in that as opposed to the Klingons, they represent liberty, freedom, and democracy. We can argue all day and night about how the West (or indeed, the USA) goes about its business, but the country-- and the West as a whole-- generally stand on principles of freedom and democracy.

That's a pretty definitive sounding statement about something that's largely a question of perspective. Omega Glory made the point very nicely that a stated philosophy can readily become divorced from the reality by using none other than the US constitution, how a people theoretically following a high ideal can nonetheless appear monstrous from another's point of view.

America as arbiters of "freedom" is far from a universally held belief or perspective and not without good reason, it certainly isn't equivalent to the Federation on anything more than the most superficial of levels and even there only really throughout TOS.

If the Federation represents anything it's a set of ideals which even it falls short of in practise, but those ideals are not those of the USA.

If the Federation is not the USA (which it really isn't) then the case falls down for casting the Klingons as the USSR (which they aren't), which in turn makes complaints about their alleged repurposing from that role pretty weak (in my view).
 
DITTO

i'll never hide my liberal leanings but by god the thing I want the most is sincerely for everyone to just stop being so petty. Legislation, change, consensus, all lasts longer when our "leaders" work together.

and STD is in a position, as all star trek installments, to show of a world and a universe of what such a world "could" look like.
Exactly. It is idealism that can propel us forward in a way that may seem impossible, given the circumstances. But, bemoaning everybody's political opinions as "wrong" is about as productive.

I heard a quote once that went something like, "A man's reach should exceed his gasp or what's a heaven for?" That is a sense of idealism that I would like to see. The idea that, no the world isn't perfect, but there are things that individuals can do, and groups can do, to reach towards that "could be" world.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top