Admittedly I'm also a non-native speaker, but the attempt to define perfection as an absolute seems incredibly futile to me. The word becomes meaningless if applied in the absolute sense in any sort of context. Perfection always has to be perfection in something. And perfection in A almost automatically means imperfection in B.
What do the Borg intend to be perfect in? If they want to be perfect gods, they will make for abysmal potted plants. If they want to be perfect cyborgs, I see no obstacles in their way, and it doesn't particularly matter that the perfect cyborg isn't the perfect noncorporeal being or the perfect sex partner or the perfect loser.
I see no merit whatsoever to Jonas' or Navaros' idea that there would only be one kind of perfection. That's not semantics, that's pure unadulterated lack of reason.
Timo Saloniemi
What do the Borg intend to be perfect in? If they want to be perfect gods, they will make for abysmal potted plants. If they want to be perfect cyborgs, I see no obstacles in their way, and it doesn't particularly matter that the perfect cyborg isn't the perfect noncorporeal being or the perfect sex partner or the perfect loser.
I see no merit whatsoever to Jonas' or Navaros' idea that there would only be one kind of perfection. That's not semantics, that's pure unadulterated lack of reason.
Timo Saloniemi