• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy worth $60?

23skidoo

Admiral
Admiral
OK, this is just nutty. Apparently Universal is planning "an experiment." A movie that's scheduled to hit theaters in the next bit called Tower Heist, which at first glance appears to be an Oceans 11 ripoff starring Eddie Murphy and Ben Stiller, is going to be released to Comcast VOD a couple weeks after its theatrical release in a couple of test markets: Atlanta and Portland (I assume Oregon).

Cost for viewing? $59.99.

http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/10/would-you-pay-5999-to-see-tower-heist-on-demand.html

While it may be fine for those with large families (as the article tries to rationalize) who no longer wish to go out in public, or if you happen to have a small auditorium in your house where you could have a few dozen friends over you could amortize the cost quite nicely, for the majority of people who watch VOD - singles and couples - the cost is just nuts. And, come on, an Eddie Murphy/Ben Stiller movie called Tower Heist? This ain't Avatar 2, and even if it were, that'd be nuts.

Sounds like the "experiment" is dead on arrival anyway - according to the story the Cinemark chain is going to pull the movie from its theaters if the test in two cities goes forward. I don't blame them. It's as nutty as the plan (that I see never came to fruition) one studio announced a few years back that would have had DVD copies of the movie available in the lobby after the show (thereby eliminating most "repeat viewing" income for the theater).

Alex
 
It sounds like a movie I wouldn't watch even if I was paid 60$. And I kinda like Ben Stiller in some of his movies (Zoolander, Tropic Thunder, Royal Tenenbaums).

It's a stupid idea anyway and it'll fail.
 
While it may be fine for those with large families (as the article tries to rationalize)...

I don't see the draw even for a large family. A large family could spend a fraction of that to rent something else if they are going to stay home.
 
Wow, this is loonancy :confused: - can not imagine this. To charge some one $60.00 for a movie (reminds me the old adds to own your own copy of Star Trek 5 for $99.99* SRP on VHS circa 1989). :p

I have a tough time paying $60.00 for a season, even blu-ray.:borg:

Not crazy about Eddie Murphy, as of late (except as Donkey):p but big fan Ben Stiller, and even still would not participate.

Not that I'm attracted to VOD (sort of ghetto release IMHO) :vulcan:

And of course COMCAST is evil.....

However what does this say about us as a society...we can no longer go to a central location to experience entertainment as a "shared" and common experience.

Another nail in the coffin of civility...

Very sad.

The
S H A T I N A T OR
 
However what does this say about us as a society...we can no longer go to a central location to experience entertainment as a "shared" and common experience.

Another nail in the coffin of civility...

We can and we do. But not everyone wants to go out to see every movie. 99% of all movies play just as well at home as in a theater.

And think of the environment. Watching a movie at home means a smaller carbon footprint.
 
Not for Tower Heist. Maybe if it was some super cool movie and I had a theater and invited 30 friends and charged them $2 a pop.
 
How much is a normal VOD or PPV? I have DISH but have never used that option.

$5.99

And can you DVR a VOD or PPV?

With Time Warner cable, at least, a VoD or PPV is available for 24 hours after ordering and then it's gone. But you can watch it as many times as you want during that time, stop it, restart it, etc. Also (if you have a DVD recorder hooked up to your cable box) you can burn a copy of the movie and keep it forever if you want.

Or so I've heard. :whistle:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top