Angels and Demons [MAJOR SPOILER]

[BoxWhatBox]

After watching the reading the novel and watching the movie, am I the only who thought it would have been better to deviate from the novels and allowed the villain not only to live but to achieve his objectives? He would have made an excellent enemy for Langdon to have in future installments of either the film series or novels. What do you think?

 

[Asbo Zaprudder]

Dan Brown is a terrible writer, and the novels and films are a waste of cellulose and celluloid respectively. That's what I think. Here's another viewpoint:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...ode-author-Dan-Browns-20-worst-sentences.html

ETA: Dan Brown's research isn't as thorough as he claims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...-Code-author-Dan-Brown-50-factual-errors.html

 

[ThunderAeroI]

Dan Brown is a terrible writer, and the novels and films are a waste of cellulose and celluloid respectively. That's what I think. Here's another viewpoint:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...ode-author-Dan-Browns-20-worst-sentences.html

ETA: Dan Brown's research isn't as thorough as he claims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...-Code-author-Dan-Brown-50-factual-errors.html

THis is solved by taking ones brain and turning it off. There is not much thought placed into them.

As for A&D, it is probably th better of the three RL books.