• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Android Sex Slaves

Do you want an android sex slave...

  • SIGN ME UP

    Votes: 48 64.0%
  • DUDE..YOU NEED HELP

    Votes: 27 36.0%

  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .
I keep reading about the Japanese and their new robots, here and there. And you have to know, that real soon, they are going to have sexy robot/android creations that are, well, fully functional. We all know that PORN drives the internet, and decided the fate of VHS vs Beta...I think SEX will drive the advancement of robots/androids.

Now..if they pair one of these androids that looks like a Japanese anime, with an AI brain, would you buy one? You know you would...even if you say you wouldn't. Would I? Sure....would I want it to have rights? hell no. Would size matter to it? Ummm..they can be reprogrammed right?

Rob
 
Make one that looks like Faye Valentine, and I'm in! So to speak.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not only would I not want one myself, I think I'd be utterly skeeved at finding out any of my friends would own such a thing. The appeal of them is that they look human, sound human, and act human but you don't have to worry about getting their consent before doin' em. I find that grotesque, tbh.
 
only if they are "fully functional" hehe

or look like this - http://dvc.org.uk/sketches/andromeda1.jpg

Seriously though, no, it is just a blow up doll really. Put a real AI in one, give it freedom and choices and a mind of its own, and then maybe we'll see some interesting relationships form between human and android.
 
Not only would I not want one myself, I think I'd be utterly skeeved at finding out any of my friends would own such a thing. The appeal of them is that they look human, sound human, and act human but you don't have to worry about getting their consent before doin' em. I find that grotesque, tbh.

Great post. It will be interesting, just as a spectator, to see how such laws would follow such creations. Because you could see the interests in not giving them 'rights' (money) and the reason for wanting them to have rights (potential voting block)...kind of mirrors real reasons we are dealing with right now with real people; in this case migrant workers.

The farmers/corporations (republicans) want them to come into our country (USA) for their cheap labor..while the Democrats want them here as potential voters for their causes...which is why illegal immigration isn't really ever stopped because both sides benefit..

As for the sexy androids/rights. Will be interesting to what happens with them. Now...lesbian androids? THEY should never get any rights...ever! (wink wink)

Rob
 
Sadly - In many ways, it already exist. Just not robotic yet. Google "real doll" (certainly not work safe) and you'll see. :wtf: :eek: :alienblush: Just a tad disturbing...
 
Sadly - In many ways, it already exist. Just not robotic yet. Google "real doll" (certainly not work safe) and you'll see. :wtf: :eek: :alienblush: Just a tad disturbing...

Exactly..thats where I read it. Add to that the new 'anime pillow' fad. Humans are a strange lot..are we not?

Rob
 
Not only would I not want one myself, I think I'd be utterly skeeved at finding out any of my friends would own such a thing. The appeal of them is that they look human, sound human, and act human but you don't have to worry about getting their consent before doin' em. I find that grotesque, tbh.

Do women get consent from their dildos ? The only distinction is that the android would look like a human rather than just a rather important part of one. They'd be a tool, nothing more. The real difference is that men would be more likely to buy them than women.

This is, however, the sort of response that would probably see such devices being made illegal or at least heavily frowned upon like prostitution and pornography.

After all, heaven forbid an unattractive person might be able to fulfill a basic biological need every so often.
 
Oops. The 'creepy' remark was in response to the Real Dolls link, not to Hermiod. Sorry - posting at the same time.

My problem's with the kind of cognitive/empathy disconnect that seems to me to be necessary to treat something that looks so human as a tool. A dildo, a vibrator, your standard sex toys hell, even old fashioned blow up dolls are just about getting your rocks off. No harm.

But the appeal of these things is about making them look more and more like real people. Making them seem as much like real people as possible. So presumably the idea is to increase the pleasure by increasing your ability to suspend disbelief. Makes it feel like you're with a real person, but one about whose mutual pleasure you don't have to worry, and whose consent can't be given or witheld.

That's not just about fulfilling a basic biological need. You can do that with your hand. It's the added psychological level of making a thing that looks so human, but that you get to use as an object.

I mean, at the risk of a browbeating for using extreme examples, what if sexdolls were being marketted that looked just like real children. They'd just be tools too, right? No actual kids being harmed, the dolls have no feelings or rights. But it's still absolutely skeevy when you think about the desires in which the people who use them are indulging.
 
Yet--better dolls than actual kids, no? I suppose the real question boils down to: is this a gateway to antisocial behaviour or a form of catharsis to safely channel antisocial tendencies?

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
Oops. The 'creepy' remark was in response to the Real Dolls link, not to Hermiod. Sorry - posting at the same time.

I thought so.

My problem's with the kind of cognitive/empathy disconnect that seems to me to be necessary to treat something that looks so human as a tool. A dildo, a vibrator, your standard sex toys hell, even old fashioned blow up dolls are just about getting your rocks off. No harm.

But that's the thing, there are literally thousands of designs of sex toy that look just like a human penis.

One could argue that buy buying one of those you are both reducing men's usefulness down to a single body part and, given how big they usually are as well, you're sending all sorts of messages.

But the appeal of these things is about making them look more and more like real people. Making them seem as much like real people as possible. So presumably the idea is to increase the pleasure by increasing your ability to suspend disbelief. Makes it feel like you're with a real person, but one about whose mutual pleasure you don't have to worry, and whose consent can't be given or witheld.

That's not just about fulfilling a basic biological need. You can do that with your hand. It's the added psychological level of making a thing that looks so human, but that you get to use as an object.

If you can do it with your hand, why does prostitution exist ?

I mean, at the risk of a browbeating for using extreme examples, what if sexdolls were being marketted that looked just like real children. They'd just be tools too, right? No actual kids being harmed, the dolls have no feelings or rights. But it's still absolutely skeevy when you think about the desires in which the people who use them are indulging.

I suggest the difference is that despite a lot of people trying to make it otherwise, it's still socially acceptable to want to have sex with a woman.

When it comes down to it, people directly affected have always objected when an easier and more convenient competition comes along. Men want sex and time was they'd have to jump through whatever hoops the local mating rituals dictate to get it. Then prostitution came along and what happened ? Prostitutes start getting called names, they're dirty, they're "whores".

After that pornography came along and people said it had to be wrapped in covers and put on the top shelf where nobody could see it because heaven forbid that a man should see a woman naked without having to work for it.

This would just be the next stage of that, easier and more convenient for men and competition for women.
 
Oops. The 'creepy' remark was in response to the Real Dolls link, not to Hermiod. Sorry - posting at the same time.

I thought so.

My problem's with the kind of cognitive/empathy disconnect that seems to me to be necessary to treat something that looks so human as a tool. A dildo, a vibrator, your standard sex toys hell, even old fashioned blow up dolls are just about getting your rocks off. No harm.

But that's the thing, there are literally thousands of designs of sex toy that look just like a human penis.

One could argue that buy buying one of those you are both reducing men's usefulness down to a single body part and, given how big they usually are as well, you're sending all sorts of messages.

But the appeal of these things is about making them look more and more like real people. Making them seem as much like real people as possible. So presumably the idea is to increase the pleasure by increasing your ability to suspend disbelief. Makes it feel like you're with a real person, but one about whose mutual pleasure you don't have to worry, and whose consent can't be given or witheld.

That's not just about fulfilling a basic biological need. You can do that with your hand. It's the added psychological level of making a thing that looks so human, but that you get to use as an object.

If you can do it with your hand, why does prostitution exist ?

I mean, at the risk of a browbeating for using extreme examples, what if sexdolls were being marketted that looked just like real children. They'd just be tools too, right? No actual kids being harmed, the dolls have no feelings or rights. But it's still absolutely skeevy when you think about the desires in which the people who use them are indulging.

I suggest the difference is that despite a lot of people trying to make it otherwise, it's still socially acceptable to want to have sex with a woman.

When it comes down to it, people directly affected have always objected when an easier and more convenient competition comes along. Men want sex and time was they'd have to jump through whatever hoops the local mating rituals dictate to get it. Then prostitution came along and what happened ? Prostitutes start getting called names, they're dirty, they're "whores".

After that pornography came along and people said it had to be wrapped in covers and put on the top shelf where nobody could see it because heaven forbid that a man should see a woman naked without having to work for it.

This would just be the next stage of that, easier and more convenient for men and competition for women.

..and they have an off switch for their vocal chords.

Rob
 
..and they have an off switch for their vocal chords.

:wtf:

Thank you for reducing this serious conversation to the content of a mother-in-law joke.

Oh its all in good fun...I would be fascinated to sit in on a supreme court session, in the not so distant future, when issues like this are argued. Could you imagine Alan Shore defending an android fighting for its rights while being forced to work at a bordello? Or androids that are uses as slave labor..

None of this is new, but we are getting so close to seeing this happen in reality...

Rob
 
I have no problems with sex androids. I refuse to call them slaves. As long as the androids aren't sentient, they are as much a slave as your hammer or kitchen toaster. As for psychological harm, there are way more dangerous things going around then this. Hell, violence in the media is likely much more troubling then this would ever be.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top