No, they're not.Are Cuse or Lindelof on this one in any capacity?
No, they're not.Are Cuse or Lindelof on this one in any capacity?
I think I'll wait until the final season is in the can before committing myself to watching this.
So you will be watching in September?![]()
Cuse developed a Civil War series for ABC this pilot season, but it didn't go beyond the script stage. I guess it's possible he could come aboard Alcatraz, but it looks like Elizabeth Sarnoff, who was part of the writing staff on Lost, is moving up to showrunner on this one.I think Damon Lindleof will be busy writing Prometheus and Trek 2, not sure what Cuse is doing but I thought they'd help JJ produce this in some capacity. Oh well.
I thought the same thing about Fringe way back when it was in season 1 and was so bland but I think the fact that Fox recently renewed Fringe despite its horrible ratings suggests that they might be a little more lenient with Abrams projects.Right but a Lost wannabe by the very creator that brought us Lost! Maybe Bad Robot can learn from the things they did wrong on that show and do them right on this one.
Well... they'll probably have thirteen episodes to do it in.![]()
There had been concern that the procedural element in it would be overshadowed by a mythology that would only get more dense over time and would put the show on track for Fringe's 1.5-2 demo rating range. But I hear the network's brass concerns were eased after a very good meeting with the producers yesterday that helped clinch the pickup. Abrams and Alcatraz co-creator/showrunner Liz Sarnoff have the credentials -- they pulled off a popular sci-fi series with Lost.
There's no way they can ping pong between a regular FBI procedural and the sf/f story. That would be too weird. How can anyone do a regular job when there's some time travel stuff going on! I know I sure couldn't focus on regular old crimes.See that is what I was afraid of--I don't want a procedural with the occasional myth episode
Abrams is saying the very same things he did when LOST first launched(they knew the numbers, smoke monster and was kept secret etc) and look how that turned out. And viewers have every right to be wary given the absymal track record for pulling off a successful serialized storyline B5 did but that's about it. LOST didn't pull it off, The X-Files didn't, nBSG didn't, The Event didn't, Heroes post S1 didn't, The 4400 didn't etc. It seems these limited premise dramas just try to get by on intrigue, atmosphere and piling on of numerous mysteries without trying to have a good idea of how to pull it altogether and by the time the how wraps up it is all made up at the last minute and turns into a convoluted mess.“Fox wanted to know what they were getting into, they did not want to get into a situation where it was a completely up-for-grabs scenario,” Abrams said. “They asked for the explanation of what’s going on to a large degree. Obviously they didn’t say, ‘Give us every script synopsis and tell us what happens in the series finale,’ but they wanted the main headlines of what the show is about, what the backstory is.”
Sarnoff wrote a document, which is obviously being kept secret from public eyes, explaining everything. Abrams says those revelations were “actually the key to getting the show on the air.” Producers will still be free to take detours and things could always change, but the fact that Alcatraz has a firm backstory — and one compelling and sensible enough to convince Fox to buy into the program — ought also reassure fans who get frustrated when they sense TV writers are completely winging it on serialized shows
Also I guess they are doing standalones with the prisoners committing some crime every week that may or may not tie into the arc every given week a la Fringe. Not really crazy about that with standard FBI/cop cases and then the occasional myth episode.“The fact that Fox asked for that was a massively helpful thing for all of us,” Abrams said. “This is a very specific stand-alone show seeing these prisoners come back every week, but there’s also this [overall mythology] story that will be a part of the tentpole episodes of the show
It sounds kinda like The 4400 where people are removed from the timeline and returned in a specific point for some mysterious reason. The writers there weaved standalones in focusing on the 4400 returnee that didn't necessarily tie into the mythology.I think it's another Lost wannabe with such a specific hook that it won't last long... Prisoners reappearing. So, each week one reappears in San Francisco? In Alcatraz? Meh. Seems more like a movie idea than something that a network wants to run for years and years.
After seeing the trailer, my hopes have risen. I think they do have a good shot at melding X-Files episodicy and Lost, errr, I shouldn't say idiocy but it does sorta rhyme...![]()
It sounds kinda like The 4400 where people are removed from the timeline and returned in a specific point for some mysterious reason. The writers there weaved standalones in focusing on the 4400 returnee that didn't necessarily tie into the mythology.I think it's another Lost wannabe with such a specific hook that it won't last long... Prisoners reappearing. So, each week one reappears in San Francisco? In Alcatraz? Meh. Seems more like a movie idea than something that a network wants to run for years and years.
Really shows should aim for more of an open more generalized premise and then craft season long arcs from that rather than doing these limited premises where the writers have to drag it out for years otherwise they'll run out of story because they have to give away too much too soon.
Yep and for me the format on Fringe never worked, You get mostly standalones--which are fine if done well--the problem though was the Fringe writers never did them well. They were stale and predictable and you sat through them anxious to get back to the more interesting mythology material.After seeing the trailer, my hopes have risen. I think they do have a good shot at melding X-Files episodicy and Lost, errr, I shouldn't say idiocy but it does sorta rhyme...![]()
Wasn't that the pitch for Fringe too?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.