Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!
Considering they cast a 39yo to play a 26yo, I'm guessing this is in fact TOS era Kirk from around 2269, and he comes back in time to Pike's era or something.
It should be. Not talking about your salary only benefits employers and their bottom line. The taboo of not discussing your salary with fellow co-workers is propaganda to get people on the cheap that don't know their worth.
Chris Pine Says ‘Star Trek’ Cast Is “Ready” And “Excited” For 2023 Movie
https://trekmovie.com/2022/03/10/chris-pine-says-star-trek-cast-is-ready-and-excited-for-2023-movie-and-waiting-for-the-script/
This is the most tired criticism. There are 13 Star Trek movies. A version of the Enterprise is destroyed in 3. That leaves 10 MOVIES where the Enterprise is not destroyed. Damaged does not equal destroyed.
That's like saying Spider-Man gets killed every movie because he gets punched. Stop it.
That's what I'm saying. They've got to lock the cast in QUICK if they hope to be shooting by the end of the year. These things have to be designed, approved, built, lit, and ready to go.
It all comes down to marketing. Audiences won't get hyped about any movie unless the trailer blows their socks off. That's literally all it takes to make someone go from "Eh, I don't care" to "Holy shit, that looks good."
This movie better have better marketing and trailers than Beyond, that's...
If that's true, and it's going forward, that means they are already knee deep in designing the 1701-A interior sets. Corridors, bridge, transporter room, etc.
And then they still have to BUILD all the sets. They can do it in 10 months, but they gotta get on the ball if they are going to film...