Search results for query: * (refine your search)

I was having a discussion about the types of people - personality-wise - that leads them to be either a 'Cat Person' or a 'Dog Person'. For example, Kirk is obviously a 'Dog Guy'; and Spock, overtly an obvious 'Cat Guy'. Too easy; and, it just fits. So the discussion became: "... but what...

I'm glad to see someone finally picked up on the humor of misspelling, mispelt, in a post regarding the perceived improper spelling of my own middle name.

Tracy is the proper spelling of my middle-name. What made you think I mispelt part of my own name? Surely, you didn't make the unfounded and faulty assumption I was trying to spell Tracey - as in the fictional TOS character - simply because I use the picture of Captain Ron Tracey in conjunction...

You might not want to go around advertising that fact... think about it :whistle:

While I appreciate the guided-tour of the keyboard and it's secondary functions - the referenced song title was written in that obviously and overtly skewed and improper manner, for the effect of a literary MIMESIS; with which - through the purposeful employment of skewed and improper spelling -...

This is not correct; because, as specifically stated in the hypothetical, you are in point-of-fact being offered a choice. Being, you have the choice not to go to Omicron Ceti III. Here is the premise again: "If YOU had the option to live on Omicron Ceti III, and live the life and lifestyle...

Very good point; and perhaps, this same reasoning might be where we get the maxim: "You are what you eat." from? Truth.

@Christopher You are quite correct in your evaluation regarding the stark reality of the hypothetical as put forth; however, in the spirit of the game - being how it was presented on TV - would you care to register a Yes or No vote? Those are not my Words-of-Waxing; but rather, the amalgamated...

Truly a great post, very insightful; yet, with all that said - and, said so well - what is your definitive answer to the question as posed? No ambiguity here. There's one for the "No" column.

In the episode 'This Side of Paradise', Dorothy Fontana and Jerry Sohl showed us a Que sara' sara' lifestyle and culture where there is perfect health, perfect happiness, perfect harmony, total acceptance, and genuine love and respect for everyone under the influence of the spores. However...

THAT, was awesome! :lol:

Yes!, Yes! Yes! THIS. Excellent. Through our discussions of the Adams' character, and, the horrifying extrapolated revelation - thank you, @ZapBrannigan - which draws on speculative implications, yet arrives at a plausible conclusion of what is most likely really going on beneath of surface...

That's very good; and, could quite likely be Adams' goal/rational/extended plan; and, just as it was with Van Gelder, it is likely Kirk's conditioning is not going to be able to keep Kirk from warning Spock and McCoy as soon as he is back on the ship - and stop that plan from succeeding. What's...

and, somehow this means the reference can't be accessed in 2021 to see if it works for the OP.... Why? You're welcome to do whatever you like. Have fun. Enjoy.

Excellent. TY. I'm on it; however, the word showing on post and in edit-mode is: color - no 's', nor brackets present and showing to alter. :shrug: TY x2: It's now been fixed; fix = by copy and paste whole post into word, save in word, paste and re-post in edit-mode. :techman:

I didn't create the strik-thru in the text. So, no clues on that one.

Which would discount the fact that he came up with his own classification-rationale... how ?

Directly: If - big supposition-indicating "if" provided up front - you hold the Franz Joseph authored Star Fleet Technical Manual as an authoritative source of information, you could reference his take on the subject; and, see if that might serve to fit into the paradigm you are wishing to...

My only point was there was no emergency before nor after the commercial; therefore, the whole business of calling an alert and showing all the red flashing lights was not supported nor justified - solely for the commercial-break. All that bandwidth-sucking minutia regarding "when is red, red...

"Jesus Christ"?!? :eek: You've got the wrong guy.