Poll: Bring Janeway back?

Discussion in 'Trek Literature' started by kimc, Mar 18, 2009.

?

Should Janeway be brought back?

  1. Yes - I don't care how

    19.3%
  2. Yes - as long as it makes sense for the story

    29.2%
  3. No way.

    51.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JB2005

    JB2005 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    England, UK
    if it went by that, they should have stopped us at about 60!
     
  2. Bob The Skutter

    Bob The Skutter Complete Arse Cleft In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Location:
    Bob The Skutter
    My copy should be delivered tomorrow. I'm just re-reading the Mirror Universe NF story.
     
  3. kissthestar

    kissthestar Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    They could do a clone.
     
  4. Hartzilla2007

    Hartzilla2007 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Star Trekkin Across the universe.
    Your not helping.
     
  5. joyofvgr

    joyofvgr Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    The only thing I would add is that if it were announced that Janeway will be resurrected, those in the "dealbreaker" group would then go out and buy Full Circle, Unworthy and any novels leading up to her resurrection, knowing what a good story line this seems to be. However, those who feel Janeway's death best served the story, and the Trek universe, may not buy a book in which she is resurrected, and become disgusted with the Voyager series. At that point, the resurrection may become the "dealbreaker" even if the story is worth it. :wtf: :lol:
     
  6. kimc

    kimc Coffee Mod Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    It's hard to assume what those fans would do. Personally, I think it would be a mixed bag. Some may feel they won't want to give it a chance (and if they're the ones saying those of us not currently interested should be giving the series a chance that would be really ironic) but others may just be willing to go with it. After all, characters come back all the time in sci fi.
     
  7. Thrawn

    Thrawn Rear Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Just like some people that don't like Janeway's death are also just willing to go with it.

    I feel like it's pretty much the same situation either way, it's just a question of relative numbers. Relative numbers we have no way of determining.
     
  8. kimc

    kimc Coffee Mod Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    That's pretty much what I was trying to say but you got it down in fewer sentances. ;)

    I guess I won't be quitting my day job as a software developer to write the "great American novel" anytime soon!
     
  9. Lynx

    Lynx Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2001
    Location:
    Lynx Empire
    I can tell you that if they bring back Janeway in a way that I find acceptable and if they don't screw up any of the other main characters of the series before that, I may buy and read "Full Circle", "Unworthy" and the books leading up to her resurrection.
     
  10. Therin of Andor

    Therin of Andor Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
    It seems to come down to whether you have trust and faith in Pocket's editors and writers, and in the CBS vetting process. Overall, I'm very trusting and they rarely let me down. Every so often - but not for ages - a novel comes along that I feel is sub par, and I find myself wondering how it made it through the process, or if it was fast-tracked due to deadline issues and didn't get the full editing job it needed.

    But even "Warped", "The Laertian Gamble" and "Into the Nexus" have their fans, and someone out there is always bound to say, "That was my favourite ST novel of all time."

    There are other ST fans who are not so trusting of "The Powers That Be", or who even believe that TPTB are vindictive towards the fans. And those fans are going to have a hard time enjoying any ST novel.

    And there are many fans of science fiction media series and movies who don't read much of anything, enjoying their shows because they are a visual medium and don't require a high level of reading skills. They will have little interest in tie-in novels, and some will be highly critical of a line they can't engage with readily.

    And there are thousands of other permutations, because "the fans" are all individuals, and we cannot even attempt to speak for them all with confidence.
     
  11. JB2005

    JB2005 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    England, UK
    That's true, we're like a cup of water compared to the whole of trek fandom. Fill a cup with water from the sea - no fish in it according to the sample you took there are no fish in the ocean...by the same tone, we don't really know how the majority of people feel about Janeway's death...
     
  12. Gorf

    Gorf Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Not exactly. No where does it state that 'Yes - I don't care how' is equal to 'I don't care if it's a good story'.

    To me it means that I don't give a shit if it ties in with the current direction of the books or makes sense in this regard, and so I don't care what the specific storyline is, but yes I bloody hell want a good story. That goes without saying. ;)

    Now what a good story is...that's an entirely different matter and something I think we could debate until the moon turns purple.
     
  13. JustKate

    JustKate Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    ^ Well, Gorf, I think if someone answers the question "Should Janeway be brought back?" with "Yes - I don't care how," that does at least imply that the quality of the story isn't the first consideration. Isn't that what "I don't care how" means?

    Perhaps that's an error in the poll as it was created, though goodness knows it's not easy to write these things, but I do think picking the first option does imply that bringing Janeway is more important than the story that does the job. That's how I interpreted it, anyway. That's why I personally answered "Yes - as long as it makes sense for the story."

    Ronny's exaggerated somewhat, though.
     
  14. Trent Roman

    Trent Roman Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Location:
    The Palace of Pernicious Pleasures
    I interpreted it as being more demanding. I want Janeway back and I want it done in a good story. No pressure. :evil:

    Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
     
  15. JB2005

    JB2005 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    England, UK
    We just need a story everyone thinks is good :)
     
  16. JustKate

    JustKate Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    And then there will be peace and brotherhood forever:)
     
  17. JB2005

    JB2005 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    England, UK
    You're right...how boring!
     
  18. Therin of Andor

    Therin of Andor Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
    And I recall Marco saying, on several occasions, he'd much rather publish stories that polarize fan opinions.

    Who wants a blah book that is so inoffensive and safe that nobody takes exception to it?
     
  19. JB2005

    JB2005 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Location:
    England, UK
    Half the ppl who posted in this topic?
     
  20. Therin of Andor

    Therin of Andor Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
    No, I'd say most of them, too, want compelling, risky, interesting stories, and would be the first to complain if their heroic Janeway featured in a totally blah, safe, innocuous novel.

    They just don't want it to be Janeway or a VOY regular who has the fatal injury or life-changing experience.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.