Am I wrong in saying that Generations is the only TNG movie to LOOK like a movie?

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies I-X' started by The Rock, May 27, 2023.

  1. The Rock

    The Rock Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida USA
    Putting the quality of Generations aside, am I alone in saying that out of all the TNG movies Generations is the only one that has movie-like cinematography? The lighting, the camera angles and shots.....everything about it makes it feel distinctly different from a regular TNG episode. The movie feels very epic and grand in scope because of its cinematography alone. Despite its budget not being all that much more than the most expensive TNG episodes, it feels much higher budget.

    Now I know that for FC and INS, they were directed by Frakes and since he has directed a lot more TV episodes than movies at that point in time, that explains why FC and INS feel very TV-like. Even NEM (despite being directed by a movie guy) still feels very TV-like to me despite the final battle between the Enterprise and the Scimitar looking really fantastic.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2023
    publiusr, Qonundrum and Richard S. Ta like this.
  2. Richard S. Ta

    Richard S. Ta Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2021
    You are not wrong. The others look like high-budget TV movies.
     
  3. arch101

    arch101 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Location:
    Quincy, MA
    I thought the opposite back then. I was thoroughly unimpressed with Gen as I thought it felt like a TV film. Especially when the Dennis McCarthy incidental music cues came in during the Excelsior segment. FC looked and felt far more big-budget to me.
     
    jackoverfull and ATimson like this.
  4. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    I thought NEM looked and felt pretty cinematic, to be honest.
     
  5. JamesRye

    JamesRye Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    I think Generations was lit very well. But the direction is pretty pedestrian. Some nice framing shots when they are on the horses. But on the whole, it doesn't embrace the wide-screen cinematic feel. And what the hell were they thinking having the actors whispering dialog all the time. Stewart gets a lot of praise for First Contact, but in Generations, I think he just phones it in.

    Frakes at least used some Dutch angles and the camera moves around a lot more. There's some verve and energy. First Contact works because it's the only movie with consistent tone in my opinion. But it's simple stuff, riffing off Alien. Insurrection is tonally inconsistent and I dont think Frakes does too good of a job. It needed more crane shots on the planet. The VFX have aged really, really badly on that one.

    Whatever you think about the Abrams movies, they truly embrace the cinematic wide-screen format. ST09 and STID are full of energy, the camera's often moving, there's a lot of medium wide shots. The only movie that really competes is TMP, which has a ton of wide shots.

    It's interesting to see the progression between Star Trek 3 and 4. I always think Nimoy shot very Conservative and workman like in 3. But in 4, he mixes up the lenses and really opens up the frame. There's some avant-garde stuff in 4 that I like.
     
  6. herofhyrule

    herofhyrule Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2021
    Having recently rewatched all four TNG films, I felt that there was something different about Generations that I couldn't quite put my finger on. I think this has put it into words for me. I think there must have been a few holdovers from the TOS films before the TNG films established their own style. Also, I imagine they wanted Generations to stand out as a film the most, since it still has the Enterprise-D instead of the E, and so reuses a lot of sets and a few CGI/physical models from the series. Even the costumes are pretty much the same, with Geordi still having his VISOR instead of his ocular impacts, and the uniforms still being the same (except that for some reason half the crew are wearing the old DS9-style uniforms). It would make sense that they made the largest effort to make Generations "film-like" to properly differentiate it from the series.
     
    Richard S. Ta likes this.
  7. Set Harth

    Set Harth Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Location:
    Annwn
    [​IMG]
     
    Vger23 likes this.
  8. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    Generations had legendary cinematographer John Alonzo on board.

    That did not hurt.
     
  9. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
  10. Smellmet

    Smellmet Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Location:
    The Northern Shires of England.
    I think you are correct and have always thought this. I absolutely love the lighting in this film. It's a gorgeous looking flick. I think the visual effects are largely superior to the following 2 movies also.

    I think Nemesis also looks pretty good in parts and some of FC does too but there's some cheap TV-standard looking work in both these films

    Insurrection, bar some ok location work, looks cheap and bland.
     
    The Rock likes this.
  11. ananta

    ananta Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    I agree. The cinematography is beautiful. The modifications to the Enterprise-D sets really help. I just realised after rewatching the films how bland and uninspiring I find the Enterprise-E sets, particularly the bridge. I’m quite a visual person; while I don’t think Generations is a particularly great film, each scene had such gorgeous contrast of lighting and use of colour. Coupled with the lovely new transfer, it looks so much better than the other TNG films, which I think lends it a more cinematic feel (although it is definitely let down by the TV movie feel of the writing).
     
    The Rock and Smellmet like this.
  12. Smellmet

    Smellmet Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Location:
    The Northern Shires of England.
    The Enterprise E sets were a downgrade from the D for me. The bridge looked like a TV set.
     
  13. Jason_Adank

    Jason_Adank Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2020
    I recently bought the 4 disc TNG Movie UHD/HDR set. And I gotta say, of the four, Generations looks absolutely stunning visually. Both because of the HDR in the mastering, but also just how scenes were lit in general ad how the shots were framed. Everything just looked awesome. Very dramatic. Wish they woulda kept that style going... because I agree with the OP, the other three movies just looked kinda bland in comparison (and they were HDR too.... didnt help... cause the lighting sucked!).
     
    Smellmet and The Rock like this.
  14. El Maestro

    El Maestro Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Do we know if the UHD/HDR versions of the movies are streaming anywhere?
     
  15. Jason_Adank

    Jason_Adank Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2020
    Aaah, I dont know. I guess Paramount+ is bringing them all back, so you could check. But imo, buying the discs is the way to go.
     
  16. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    [​IMG]
     
    Peach Wookiee likes this.
  17. Ssosmcin

    Ssosmcin Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Location:
    ssosmcin
    Yeah streaming, no matter how great your bandwidth, isn't the same as hardcopy media. My 4K blu rays look and sound much better than what comes over the innerwebz. And I never have to worry about them disappearing due to rights agreements.
     
  18. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    I think First Contact. Generations might have with Alonzo doing his thing if they weren't using sets made for tv in the 70's and props and uniforms made for the shows in the early 90's. Worst mistake was reusing the Bird of Prey explosion from Trek 6. How could they have been so foolish to think nobody would notice.
     
  19. Ssosmcin

    Ssosmcin Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Location:
    ssosmcin
    That pulled me right out of the moment. It wasn't just another stock explosion or traveling ship shot. It was the action climax and one of the emotional highs of the previous film.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2023
  20. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    Yeah, super cheap. They wasted a ton of money on the orbital skydive sequence that was never used, a bottle of champagne floating through space that was completely unnecessary, and even a few million dollars on a re-shoot that wasn't REALLY an improvement...but yet they couldn't be bothered to make a good sequence of the BoP exploding.