"Where Silence Has Lease": Nagilum's observations

Discussion in 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' started by Ragitsu, Dec 7, 2021.

  1. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Good afternoon.

    Has anyone here tried directly linking each of Nagilum's final observations about humanity to the actions of the Enterprise-D crew?

    • Finds no tranquility in anything.
    • Struggles against the inevitable.
    • Thrives on conflict.
    • Selfish while valuing loyalty.
    • Rash.
    • Quick to judge.
    • Slow to change.
    • Aggressive.
    • Hostile.
    • Militant.
    One that leaps out to me years later is the selfishness bit: Haskell insists to Picard that the Enterprise-D make a break for the star fix despite the fact that they'd be leaving two of their comrades behind.
     
    Qonundrum and Unimatrix Q like this.
  2. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    You'd have to provide context for this statement, as I have no idea what you're talking about.

    Edit: Never mind, I just read the episode transcript. Haskell (the navigator of the week) just seems to be doing his job by informing Picard that there's a way to escape but that they have to take it right then. I don't read any selfishness in his actions.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
  3. CaptainWacky

    CaptainWacky More than meets the eye Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2000
    Location:
    CaptainWacky
    Worf was certainly aggressive in making his point that a shipt has "one Bridge, one Riker." But he's not human.
     
    Ragitsu likes this.
  4. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    While Worf and Riker are exploring the false Yamato, the as-of-yet unseen Nagilum provides a tantalizing exit in the form of a hole in the void; at this point, not only does the Enterprise's transporter fail to establish a lock on both men, but the tractor beam is unable to tow the Yamato. The choice is obvious: leave and desert your comrades or stay and relinquish the option for escape. Haskell (an Ensign at the conn) mentions the "star fix" (i.e., the space visible through the hole), Picard makes it clear that he sees it and then the aforementioned complications/convenient failures crop up. Eventually, the hole begins to close in on itself and Haskell becomes insistent that they seize the opportunity to flee; Picard vociferously denies the Ensign and Miles O'Brien is finally able to transport Riker plus Worf back. Once everyone is safely on board, the hole finally disappears.

    To me, he came across as undeniably insistent. What the script doesn't convey is the urgency in his voice; he clearly knows that they'll be leaving men behind and he doesn't seem to care.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    Farscape One likes this.
  5. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Sorry, I'm not reading that at all. The guy is just giving Picard a sitrep. He's a Starfleet officer whose ship in trapped and he's informing his commanding officer that there's a way out despite the possibility that doing so will leave two crewmembers behind. The guy is thinking of the ship, not individual people. That's not being selfish. I think you're reading too much into something that isn't really there.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  6. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Keep in mind that he's then killed in a disturbing fashion. I can't help but wonder if he was meant to come across as slightly unsympathetic. Anyhow...if you disagree with my interpretation, that's all right; I am open to other points of view on what Nagilum meant when he said "You are selfish, yet you value loyalty.".
     
    cgervasi likes this.
  7. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Well, Haskell died because he conveniently replaced Wesley at the station, and because he was wearing a red shirt (you didn't think Nagilum was going to kill Wesley, did you? ;)), not because of anything he said or did. He was just the expendable crewperson of the week.

    And it's ironic that Nagilum accuses humanity of being aggressive and hostile, and yet performs an aggressive and hostile act by killing someone.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    Jedman67 and fireproof78 like this.
  8. Unimatrix Q

    Unimatrix Q Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Location:
    Germany
    Love this episode.

    It's interesting that there are apparently no direct connections between Nagilum's observations and the behavior of the crew of the Enterprise-D.

    It's a bit different if one looks at Michael Burnham. Almost all points that Nagilum mentions are true in regard to her ( with the exception of being hostile and militant most of the time).

    And by the way, i guess we haven't seen Nagilum for the last time ;)

    https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/my-main-suspects-for-the-anomaly.309787/unread
     
    Ragitsu likes this.
  9. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    Nagilum was a dick. Fuk what that guy thinks of us.
     
  10. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    fireproof78 likes this.
  11. Unimatrix Q

    Unimatrix Q Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Location:
    Germany
    Why are you so sure? Could of course be that you are right and the anomaly hasn't anything to do with Nagilum at all, but the possibility is there and still exists.

    Not everyone dislikes this episode and we don't know what the Discovery writers think of it, or do you know more about their opinions and plans?
     
  12. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    The possibility that Brian Brophy created the anomaly also exists, but I don't seriously think he did it. You are of course welcome to your opinions, but there comes a time when you have to seriously think about what you're actually saying, and understand when the majority of people don't agree with you. There's no possible way Nagilum caused the anomaly because Nagilum has nothing to do with the story they are telling. He was just a one-off asshole alien that nobody cares about, least of all the present DSC viewing audience who have no idea who he even is, and wouldn't care if they did. The DSC writers making Nagilum the cause for the anomaly is the stupidest, most idiotic thing they could possibly do. What payoff does Nagilum give the characters, or the audience? Sometimes a crazy theory is just a crazy theory that shouldn't be propagated as some sort of truth like you just did by hijacking the OP's thread to make it look like your theory is an actual fact.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    Vger23 likes this.
  13. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    I don't really care either way, but I'm with @Dukhat on this one.

    There's as much of a chance that Jason Vigo created the anomoly as there is that Nagilum is involved.

    And Jason Vigo would probably be more interesting at this point. So...I'm not sure whey it's even a thing. It's basically a Mad Libs game of saying <insert name of any inane one-of Star Trek character/entity/whatever here> is responsible for the anomaly.

    "Oooohhhhh cool! J'Onn from Star Trek V created the anomoly!!! I betcha I'm right!! Woo hoooo!"

    [​IMG]
     
    fireproof78 and Dukhat like this.
  14. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Relax, guys.
     
  15. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Welcome to the TrekBBS. Nobody relaxes here.
     
    Oddish and fireproof78 like this.
  16. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    I'm super relaxed. Thanks for the unsolicited advice, though!

    ;)
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  17. Mojochi

    Mojochi Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    "Is it also true that you have only a limited existence?"
    "Your minds call it death".

    For it to already know about their life cycle a bit, & that they call it death, means Nagilum is basing its assessment of them on more than just observations of what they did or how they behaved. It is likely in some way telepathically reading their thoughts

    That could give it more than enough knowledge base to make the subsequent judgments of them.
     
  18. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Picard: "Oh, Nagilum, if you would be so kind, would you mind telling me who exactly is selfish? I have crew evaluations coming up and extra insight always helps."
     
    cgervasi likes this.
  19. Mojochi

    Mojochi Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    I'm sure plenty of them have some selfish tendencies. The real question to ask yourself is can we accept Nagilum as a reliable judge? I mean what could be more selfish, aggressive, & conflictual than mortally toying with intelligent beings to satisfy your curiosities, & then rashly passing judgement on them thereafter? Nagilum is a hypocritical asshole.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  20. Ragitsu

    Ragitsu Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2021
    The comparison that comes up (and was hinted at in this episode) is that of scientists performing tests on laboratory animals...tests that occasionally result in the death of a subject.