Spoilers 31st/32nd Century Ships Revealed

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by NCC-73515, Oct 22, 2020.

  1. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    That’s what it looked like to me too.

    Maybe. But the problem with how the scene is structured is that 99% of the ships in that salvage yard are from the era that Burnham (and even Georgiou) belong to. Yet neither one acknowledges this. Again, it’s almost as if there’s a disconnect between the scriptwriters and the VFX personnel. Either that, or it’s being implied that 900-year-old ships were still in use up to the Burn, which I don’t think was the intent of the writers. I like your theory that those old ships were already salvaged when the Burn happened, but I also don’t think that was the writers’ intent.

    Unless older ships did not get destroyed in exactly the same way as the newer ships did.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2020
    saddestmoon and Markonian like this.
  2. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Georgiou does immediately start pestering Tolor with requests for 900-year-old items, FWIW. Might well be the planet specializes in those, and advertises, and anybody going there knows this by default.

    When our two heroines arrive, Georgiou does indicate ignorance. But Burnham does not, not directly and explicitly anyway. She might have read the brochure, and the Emperor is always quick on the pickup, so we really don't need their commentary here.

    Quite possible. Then again, many of the Hiawatha-type ones seem not-destroyed-at-all... So the competing assumption that they stopped working for some unrelated reason (and thus possibly at some other time) is rather attractive.

    Timo Salonniemi
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  3. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Yeah. I find it a coincidence of galactic proportions that the salvage yard where Book gets captured just happens to be filled with 900 year old ships rather than 140 year old ships...
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  4. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Especially since Book went specifically hunting for leftovers from a 32nd century starship, not a 23rd century one!

    But there might be Reasons. The recorder supposedly originally came up on a generic Bajoran Exchange, the trail then led to Hunhau. To really reach, perhaps the Orions were aware that Book had been peddling 23rd century hardware earlier on, and thought he might be of use on this specific type of scrap yard, and thus arranged for him to get caught there?

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  5. ITDUDE

    ITDUDE Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 15, 2001
    Or in Star Trek terms, it's another Thursday ;)
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  6. Markonian

    Markonian Fleet Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Location:
    Derbyshire, UK
    Ship names derived from next week's promo:
    Besides USS Yelchin, can anyone make out the name of the ships?
    Sounds like the Yelchin (RIP Anton) is the NCC-4774xx ship.

    USS Yelchin NCC-4774...
    USS Govnor?
    USS Geocony? EDIT: identified as USS Giaconi NCC-316608
     
    DEWLine likes this.
  7. AaronMorse

    AaronMorse Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Location:
    Moncton New Brunswick Canada
    Looking at the NCC numbers It seems to me that Starfleet has done very little in the way of construction since The Burn.. or is it maybe that they're just using the older ships to maintain the Cloak for Starfleet HQ while the front line ships are out and about?

    Example
    NCC Giaconi NCC316608 Destroyed during The Burn. AKA Black Box #3
    NCC Armstrong NCC317659 Hanging out at StarFleet HQ doing it's best impression of a pimped out Future-Connie.
     
    Ronald Held and KirkusOveractus like this.
  8. AaronMorse

    AaronMorse Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Location:
    Moncton New Brunswick Canada
    Sounded like Gothnor to me.. Maybe Klingon or Tellarite name??
     
    Markonian likes this.
  9. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    The Constitution-lookalikes appear really primitive compared to the rest - fixed nacelles, round saucers and so forth. It's rather surprising that the Armstrong would be in the same registry range as any of the future ships. The next step up, the vertical all-solid design exemplified by the Nog, might also be really old, and ships just last longer in the future. I'm all for Starfleet not building all that many of them, then. And a hundred thousand extra ones, to get to the Yelchin, could nicely cover several centuries in that case.

    Yeah, I think construction of new ships would utterly cease with the Burn. Why make ships if you can't make them move?

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  10. AaronMorse

    AaronMorse Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Location:
    Moncton New Brunswick Canada
    Unless the USS Yelchin is a NCC-4774X-E instead of a NCC-4774XX.. Maybe named after a famous Late Excelsior Class Batch from the 2320s Anyone have a really nice screen cap of that?? *Look at how I muddy the waters!*
     
    Markonian and Timo like this.
  11. Lakenheath 72

    Lakenheath 72 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    CC has Gav'Nor.

    Adding to the above list:
    NCC-325019 (name unknown)
    NCC-325070 (USS Nog)
    NCC-325072 (possibly USS Hansando)
     
    Markonian likes this.
  12. AaronMorse

    AaronMorse Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Location:
    Moncton New Brunswick Canada
    Aha! Well then.. Here's what I have as a master list thus far..

    USS Voyager NCC-74656-J New-Trepid Class
    USS Yelchin NCC-4774XX Black Box #1
    USS Gav'Nor (assumed Starfleet ship?) Black Box #2
    USS Giaconi NCC-316608 Black Box #3
    USS Armstrong NCC-317659 New-Stitution Class
    Name Unknown NCC-325019 (Any one get a look at the class of this?)
    USS Nog NCC-325070 Eisenburg Class
    USS Hansando? NCC-325072 (Any one get a look at the class of this?)
    USS Cuyahoga
    USS LeGuin
     
    ITDUDE and Markonian like this.
  13. Lakenheath 72

    Lakenheath 72 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Add NCC-1864-M to the list.:hugegrin:
     
    Ar-Pharazon and AaronMorse like this.
  14. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
    That one 3/4 tactical view of the Cuyahoga in Vance's office looked a lot like a 23rd century Connie refit.
     
  15. AaronMorse

    AaronMorse Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Location:
    Moncton New Brunswick Canada
    Aha! Forgot one.. good catch :) Oh! Forgot the USS Constitution too!

    USS Voyager NCC-74656-J New-Trepid Class
    USS Yelchin NCC-4774XX Black Box #1
    USS Gav'Nor (assumed Starfleet ship?) Black Box #2
    USS Giaconi NCC-316608 Black Box #3
    USS Armstrong NCC-317659 New-Stitution Class
    Name Unknown NCC-325019 (Any one get a look at the class of this?)
    USS Nog NCC-325070 Eisenburg Class
    USS Hansando? NCC-325072 (Any one get a look at the class of this?)
    USS Tikhov NCC-1067-M Seed Vault Ship
    USS Constitution New-Stitution Class
    USS Cuyahoga
    USS LeGuin
     
  16. KirkusOveractus

    KirkusOveractus Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Ambler, PA
    I was thinking of that when I was watching! That silhouette was sure familiar!
     
    137th Gebirg and Markonian like this.
  17. Markonian

    Markonian Fleet Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Location:
    Derbyshire, UK
    A ship summary - great idea!
    Btw, it's Eisenberg class, after the late actor.

    Sorting by registry numbers we get:
    1. USS Discovery (NCC-1031-A, Crossfield class), active (3189)
    2. USS Tikhov (NCC-1067-M, seed-vault ship), active (3189)
    3. USS Reliant (NCC-1864-M, new Constitution), active (3189)
    4. USS Yelchin (NCC-4774…-…, Black Box #1), destroyed (3069)
    5. USS Voyager (NCC-74656-J, Intrepid class), active (3189)
    6. USS Armstrong (NCC-317659, new Constitution), active (3189)
    7. USS … (NCC-325019, unknown), active (3189)
    8. USS Nog (NCC-325070, Eisenberg class), active (3189)
    9. USS Hansando (NCC-325072, unknown), active (3189)
    10. USS Giacconi (NCC-316608, Black Box #3), destroyed (3069)
    11. USS Cuyahoga (unknown), active (3189)
    12. USS Le Guin (unknown), active (3189)
    13. USS Gav’Nor/Gothnor (Black Box #2), destroyed (3069)

    Bonus:
    14. Wreck at Hima: USS ... (NCC-..., new Constitution), destroyed (3069)
    15. Wreck at Sahil's station: ... (NCC-..., new Constitution), destroyed (3069)
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2020
    AaronMorse, Dukhat and saddestmoon like this.
  18. Agony_Boothb

    Agony_Boothb Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Also losing member worlds meant losing shipyards and other resources. Also starfleet may have lost a ton of shipyards from the burn itself.
     
    saddestmoon and SJGardner like this.
  19. yenny

    yenny Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    I'm assuming that the USS. Yelshin is name after Anton Yelchin. So it registry is probably NCC-477489. 89 will be the year Anton Yelchin was born.
     
    XCV330 likes this.
  20. Agony_Boothb

    Agony_Boothb Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    From a production point of view they just needed ships to crash and go boom. It doesn't really make sense to create whole new assets to represent a time may be 50 - 100 years before the burn from scratch just for them to be in the background and then crashed into a building and never shown again.