The Temporal Cold War in Enterprise and franchise continuity

Discussion in 'General Trek Discussion' started by Matthew Raymond, Jul 6, 2020.

  1. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    Many people have the opinion that Enterprise, and then later Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard, created a lot of violations of previous continuity. Some, for example, would say that Discovery isn't actually in the Prime timeline. However, perhaps there's a more subtle way to deal with inconsistencies between older and newer series. Perhaps the differences are the result of the Temporal Cold War in Enterprise. Temporal agents from the future would have gone back in time to restore the timeline to the best of their abilities, so the events of all shows before Enterprise would have generally happened the same way, but certain details might be impossible to fix completely, resulting in many small discrepancies. The result is a sort of "Cold War Prime" timeline where minor differences exist, but the overall chain of events is the same. The Kelvin timeline would actually be a branch off the Cold War Prime timeline rather than the original Prime timeline.

    Anyways, just a thought. Does this work for fixing most issues in continuity between older and newer series?
     
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    For me, generally, yes.
     
    Unimatrix Q likes this.
  3. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    I appreciate your zeal, but for me, I don’t need any convoluted explanations to justify my belief that DSC is a reboot. It just is.
     
    StarCruiser and F. King Daniel like this.
  4. Spot261

    Spot261 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Location:
    spot261
    Seems reasonable.

    Ok, canon problems solved.
     
  5. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Finally.
     
  6. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    I blame everything on the Temporal Cold War. When in doubt, that's my out. It even rhymes.

    Gabrielle Burnham is someone else I blame. You just can't go wrong with time travel.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2020
    Spot261, saddestmoon and Unimatrix Q like this.
  7. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    Or you could just not worry about continuity. Just a thought.
     
    Morgan Primus, ThankQ, Sci and 2 others like this.
  8. 1001001

    1001001 Serial Canon Violator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Location:
    Undisclosed Fortified Compound
    E8D21A8B-6B79-4DCC-BA43-C99F6DFDFC7B.gif
     
  9. somebuddyX

    somebuddyX Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    All the previous shows had just as much inconsistencies with each other and even themselves and no Temporal Cold War will explain any of that. There's no point sweating the small details. If the stories and acting are good I couldn't care less.
     
    Nyotarules, Sci and Spot261 like this.
  10. Unimatrix Q

    Unimatrix Q Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Location:
    Germany
    Yeah. I think it's even a very good way to explain differences in plot and lore of the early seasons of TOS and TNG (aka early installment weirdness) imo.
     
  11. Michael

    Michael Good Bad Influence Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Location:
    Aloha Quadrant
    There have always been those pesky “It's not real Trek!” discussions in fandom, most commonly when a new version of Trek was premiering. But when Enterprise aired and introduced their “Temporal Cold War” and then later when Star Trek (2009) firmly established an alternative timeline, it completely soured the discourse among fans. What the writers intended as clever plot elements is now mostly used to discount and disparage a version of Trek you don't like. It has become a way to say that a version of Trek somehow doesn't “count”. Star Trek fans can be a pathetic, childish bunch of people.
     
  12. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    When I was watching ENT a few months ago, I remember Archer telling Daniels to leave him out of anything else with the Temporal Cold War (or something to that effect) and my thought was, "I'm with you. However it turns out, I don't want to know!" Crazy, wild time-antics with butterfly effects no doubt.

    When it came to the Temporal Cold War, the only thing I really cared about was when Daniels took Archer to the 31st Century. At which point my mind instantly perked up and thought, "Is there something I should look out for as a Discovery fan, given this isn't too far off from when the third season will be set?" Then Daniels said, "This isn't the way I remember it!" Then I thought, "Okay. I guess not... "
     
    somebuddyX likes this.
  13. Tim Thomason

    Tim Thomason Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    USS Protostar
    I blame Lazarus
     
    Spot261 and Lord Garth like this.
  14. Spot261

    Spot261 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Location:
    spot261
    ISWYDT
     
    Lord Garth likes this.
  15. marlboro

    marlboro Guest

    Future Guy should have been a Romulan. Give him multiple objectives: using the Enterprise to defeat the Sphere Builders, using the Suliban to weaken the Klingons, and giving future tech to the Romulan Empire in order to win the Earth-Romulan War.

    You give the series a Big Bad for four seasons (hopefully more) and you explain away a lot of continuity issues like the things that conflict with Balance of Terror.
     
  16. Guy Gardener

    Guy Gardener Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2000
    Location:
    In the lap of squalor I assure you.
    Are you suggesting that Future Guy is CGI young Mark Leonard, as the Romulan Commander from Balance of Terror?
     
    somebuddyX likes this.
  17. marlboro

    marlboro Guest

    "We are creatures of duty, Captain. I have lived my life by it. Just one more duty to perform...to go back in time and fuck with Scott Bakula."
     
  18. Farscape One

    Farscape One Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    Location:
    Farscape One
    What does that stand for?
     
  19. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    I See What You Did There
     
  20. Ralphis

    Ralphis Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Location:
    [Redacted]
    Yes, absolutely.

    You take the "alternate reality created by time travel that doesn't erase the previous timeline" idea presented in Star Trek '09; mix it with the multiverse showcased in TNG's Parallels and referenced in DSC's Into the Forest I Go, Despite Yourself, and What's Past Is Prologue, the possibilities are endless. I've wished for a long time that Star Trek would utilize its "already existing in canon" multiverse in the way that DC Comics has used theirs. It might seem like a cop-out to some, but I think it would help the franchise out.

    Yeah, of course, it's probably better to just not think about all this stuff and just enjoy ENT & DSC and any other future prequel/interquel/reboot-prequel hybrid/prebootquel for what they are, and not judge it for looking more advanced than previous works that are chronologically set after it. But that ain't happening... not with this fan base.