Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Picard' started by pst, Jan 9, 2020.

  1. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    In the shot of the butt end of the fleet, it's easier to tell that there are two actually rather distinct nacelle types, one with a racetrack cross section and another with a rectangular cross section. The former are the ones that have twin Bussards, the latter are the ones with more Sovereign/Nova/Prometheus -like triangle or tetrahedron 'scoops and more glow to the aft flanks.

    Of the two nacelle variants, the angular ones are seen at two different angles, perfectly horizontal and canted outward. The oval-end ones are only ever seen canted inward, that is, tops closer to each other than bottoms. Whether this means "three variants" or just one ship type that got refitted with tilting nacelles at some point... Nobody cares. The fact that the hulls are identical and the nacelles can only be told apart with patience bordering on insanity is already enough to establish the whole project as a dismal failure, when the original intent was to feature multiple distinct ship types.

    The saving grace is that the hulls and nacelles are exactly how STO "predicted the future": the style is consistent, and might be followed in future PIC adventures, which quite possibly finally feature the ships that didn't quite make it to "Et In Arcadia Ego II" yet.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Gonzo and Ar-Pharazon like this.
  2. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    I wouldn't even consider them different sub-classes. They copy & pasted 2, maybe 3 "types". Still an impressive sight when they popped in.

    The starboard engine of the closest ship is cut off in that initial shot, so I was guessing (green) & (orange) might have the same features. They are the same shape. The eventual blu-rays should give us a cleaner look.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2020
    Gonzo and 137th Gebirg like this.
  3. Sci

    Sci Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    Montgomery County, State of Maryland
    Fun fact: A child born on the day Star Trek: First Contact opened (22 November 1996) is now 23 years old and will turn 24 this year. A child who was, say, 8 or so years old when First Contact opened is now 31 and turning 32 this year. They have lived through four (soon possibly five) presidents, two major wars, two "once-in-a-lifetime" economic crashes, a crippling worldwide pandemic, and, now, a nationwide anti-racism revolt. So... the Enterprise-E is actually kind of old now!

    In point of fact, you could argue that the Enterprise-E is the longest-standing (IRL) "Prime Timeline" Enterprise design:

    TOS Enterprise: 1966-1979 (13 years)
    TMP Enterprise: 1979-1991 (12 years)
    Enterprise-D: 1987-1994 (7 years)
    Enterprise-E: 1996-present (23 years)

    In fairness, arguably the E's tenure as the "franchise flagship" actually ended in 2002 with NEM. In which case the more broad "Enterprise hero ship" tenures would be:

    TOS Enterprise: 1966-1979 (13 years)
    TMP Enterprise: 1979-1991 (12 years)
    Enterprise-D: 1987-1994 (7 years)
    Enterprise-E: 1996-2002 (6 years)
    Kelvinverse Enterprise: 2009-2016 (7 years)
    Kelvinverse Enterprise-A: 2016 (1 year)
    DIS Enterprise: 2018-present (2 years)

    Either way... The Enterprise-E and the kids who grew up with it are getting kind of old now!
     
    ATimson, Saul, tax1234 and 1 other person like this.
  4. The Old Mixer

    The Old Mixer Mih ssim, mih ssim, nam, daed si Xim. Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Location:
    The Old Mixer, Somewhere in Connecticut
    I always liked that shot...I'll take four Connies flying in formation over 200 tiny generic ships any day of the week.
     
  5. Tim Thomason

    Tim Thomason Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    USS Protostar
    What about the NX-01? <ducks from rotten vegetables>
     
    cooleddie74 likes this.
  6. WarpFactorZ

    WarpFactorZ Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Location:
    Configuring the Ontarian Manifold
    THERE. IS. ONE. SHIP-CLASS!
     
  7. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    Couldn't agree more. The US Navy uses the term "flight" (for some reason) to differentiate between different versions of the same ship classes. The Arleigh Burke DD's are a prime example.

    Same class with various differences.
     
    137th Gebirg likes this.
  8. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    Or, say, the Ohio-class SSBNs and the slightly modified Ohio-class SSGNs outfitted with cruise missile launch tubes and facilities for special forces personnel. Same class but marginally different layouts and appearances.
     
    Ar-Pharazon likes this.
  9. Sci

    Sci Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    Montgomery County, State of Maryland
    I literally forgot about it! Whoops! :lol:
     
    jackoverfull and Tim Thomason like this.
  10. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    We had longer Essex class carriers ("extended bow" or "long hull"). The Navy still listed them as Essex class despite the unofficial reference of "Ticonderoga class".
     
    cooleddie74 likes this.
  11. Saul

    Saul Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    東京
    The change is so difficult to notice. Why even bother? Was it just throwing a meatless bone to fans to argue over?
     
    saddestmoon and Ar-Pharazon like this.
  12. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    If it was 50 years ago, I'd wonder. Now, with all the arguing that goes on over every little thing, they may be purposely trying to drive us all nuts.

    IDK, they may really have thought 2 or 3 nacelle types would be enough. 2 or 3 ships classes would have been OK by me. Not necessarily the umpteen classes from a late DS9 battle.
     
    jackoverfull and Saul like this.
  13. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Perhaps one nacelle was a preliminary design and the other was the final approved design, but then things got rushed and both types accidentally were used.
     
    Saul likes this.
  14. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Or then the decree was "make many designs", and since they failed at that, they did whatever they could - which was limited to putting the nacelles from their unfinished Design B on their finished Design A.

    Supposedly four distinct hulls were being constructed for the episode, and three never made it. Perhaps there were four nacelles under construction, too?

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Ar-Pharazon and Saul like this.
  15. Kpnuts

    Kpnuts Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 1999
    The scene wouldn't have been so bad if they had reigned in CBS Treks' usual mantra of "fill the screen with as many ships/asteroids/drones/debris as possible!!!11 That'll make it epic!!!" and given us say 10 or so ships against another 10. But no, gotta be "EPIC!!!"

    Even though the face off in The Defector involving 6 ships total (as just one example) was 10x more dramatic and memorable than the ST:Picard scene.
     
  16. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Because of obsession with minutia.
     
    Turtletrekker and Saul like this.
  17. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Chabon said there were 3 designs approved for the episode.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2020
    Saul likes this.
  18. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    Approved != Used
     
  19. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Yes I know, I was commenting on Timo's line about 4 being designed for the episode but not used.
     
    137th Gebirg likes this.
  20. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    That scene where they scaled up a 12 man bird of prey to match a Romulan Warbird? You'd have lost your marbles over that if it happened today.
     
    Gonzo, burningoil and NCC-73515 like this.