Spoilers Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Grading & Discussion

Discussion in 'Star Wars' started by Commander Richard, Dec 10, 2017.

?

Grade the movie.

  1. A+

    13.8%
  2. A

    17.6%
  3. A-

    14.8%
  4. B+

    13.8%
  5. B

    7.2%
  6. B-

    6.6%
  7. C+

    3.1%
  8. C

    5.9%
  9. C-

    5.9%
  10. D+

    1.4%
  11. D

    2.1%
  12. D-

    2.8%
  13. F

    5.2%
  1. Hela

    Hela Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2015
    Location:
    Hela
    I have no idea if that a serious correction, or just building on a joke.

    But it works as both, so I’ll take it.

    1. J.O.K.E . Sarcasm. Facetiousness. Not often accompanied by fainting spells.

    2. Who the hell claimed it was a moral issue?

    Hot Husband material: a whiny, hairless, scrawny kid. Who, in another life, still couldn’t drink and would totally be chowing down on a Tide Pod right now.

    The thought of banging that is a horror, just not the kind you’re thinking of.:lol:

    1. Where did Luke express that he still had a crush at the end of ANH? It’s not because some man and a woman had eye contact, is it?

    2. Han wasn’t concieved as flirting with Leia in ANH. He literally never has a line with her that is not part of an argument or an insult, and she has one that isnt-but-still-kinda-is (‘I knew there was more to you than money.’) Because in the first movie, Han was totally making eyes at Luke.

    ESB retconned it all into their flirtation. Cos Fisher and Ford ended up with visible chemistry. Cos the actors were actually fucking.

    3. A one sided crush or flirtation is not ‘a romance.’ . Unless you want to go all classical with your usage, in which case Luke is also totally having a romantic moment with that two-sun horizon.

    Yes. That would be because by that time, I was addressing a different point.

    I understand how you missed that, when you...purposefully cut out all the surrounding context. Including all my other mentions of non-ANH media.

    And yes, when one explicitly says they’re referring to ‘the archetypal example’ that does usually refer to a singular thing. Oh, what a woe to be sneaky and caught out.:wah:
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2018
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Morality tales are often presented in this way. Mythology can be presented in this way. Cultures respond differently to different stories, Myth making builds with societies and can take different shapes. The fact that individuals tear TFA apart for replicating ANH too much and then beat up on TLJ for changing tropes is an inconsistency that is hard to fathom.
     
    indranee likes this.
  3. Hela

    Hela Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2015
    Location:
    Hela
    Trying to justify Padme’s characterisation by comparing her to Greek tragedy, kinda doesn’t work when - at various points and places - many Greek cultures didn’t consider women to be fully human.

    And I ain’t talking about ‘treated them as if they weren’t fully human.’ I mean, they were literally referred to as being just above animals.

    The prequels are from the early 2000’s. Something is very fucking wrong when shit like Xena and Disney’s Hercules had already done a better (that’s not saying ‘perfect’) job of straight up adapting the female characters from Greek myth, than Lucas did just playing with the archetypes

    That’s not touching on how Padme comes across as pretty iffy even by Greek mythology standards. Characters like Medea, Athena, Penelope, Aphrodite, Elektra, Hera etc may be horrible stereotypes and have all their actions be determined by how they relate to menfolk, but even they end up taking some action.

    That first one in particular was not really into ‘abusing me is fine’. She was more the ‘smother the twins, nail the corpses to Anakin’s forehead out of spite, then dump his ass’ kind.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2018
    fireproof78 likes this.
  4. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Moddin' Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Earth
    Humans should at least behave like humans in a story, especially our heroes. Neither Anakin or Padme are sympathic on any level. They’re two emotional stunted people in a toxic relationship. Luke and Leia not growing up with either is why they ended up functional caring people.

    Saying “it’s a story” is just an excuse for terrible writing. Under a better writer Anakin and Padme could have worked and been sympathic. We’re supposed to care about them, not right them off as doomed from the start. It’s not a tragedy, it’s a foregone conclusion. A tragedy is seeing a character you like falling to the Dark Side, not a psychopath becoming a monster.
     
    T'Bonz likes this.
  5. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Well put. I completely agree. The largest problem that I struggle with in the PT is caring about Anakin or that he falls to the Dark Side. I just don't.
     
    Awesome Possum likes this.
  6. indranee

    indranee Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    "A long LONG time ago, in a galaxy far FAR away".

    What about that fucking sentence tells you that it was set in the 2000s in the USA?
     
  7. indranee

    indranee Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Humans kill, main, rape, loot, smuggle, molest, and do other heinous things ALL the time.

    Humans are not sympathetic much of the time.

    An author or a director or a screenwriter does not owe the readership or the viewership ANYTHING except the authenticity of what they want to write or show. NOTHING ELSE.

    If you like it and get something about it, cool. If you don't, go watch something else that you identify with.
     
    burningoil likes this.
  8. Kevman7987

    Kevman7987 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    May 20, 2013
    Location:
    Erie, PA, USA
    Well, this thread went to hell since I was last here...
     
    Campe and fireproof78 like this.
  9. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Moddin' Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Earth
    Do you know that none of that is heroic though? Because Anakin was supposed to be a hero and he doesn’t do heroic things, he kills children. Anakin is shown as a dangerous psychopath, angry with every single aspect of his life. If he were in any other film he’d be the villain or a spree killer. Yet the movie clearly wants us to care about him, which if you’re a normal functioning human you can’t do.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  10. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Yeah, no. It's a story about how a good person turns evil, which Anakin never feels like. He simply goes from an arrogant jerk to a bad guy, with little transition between the two, aside from the occasional atmospheric shot. Atmospheric shots, by the way, don't make a character for an audience member to identify with.
     
    Awesome Possum likes this.
  11. Hela

    Hela Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2015
    Location:
    Hela
    You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.

    There is no galaxy a long time ago, and far far away. Nothing in the movie, characterisation or otherwise, was ever determined by its setting.

    It’s dictated by a bunch of Americans making some decisions the 70’s, 90/00’s, and ‘10’s.

    And even if the setting did dictate behaviour...why the fuck is it ‘logical’ that a bunch of laser sword wielding aliens would adhere to our examplesclassical behaviour? And not just the history and mythology of humanity as a whole, but archetypes from a few specific cultures?

    For eg. Star Wars owes an assload on its ‘inspiration’ to Kurosawa. Now, I admittedly haven’t seen Kurosawa’s entire canon. And his female characters aren’t always the most active lot. But I’ve yet to see one where the female hero just lays down and dies of nothing but grief over her husband being an arsehole.

    Hell, Kurosawa even adapted a few Shakespearean tragedies. The female leads did fall into other stereotypes, but they were still miles a-fucking-head of Padme. Part of the reason Ran holds up so well, is because Lady Kaede was a frigging fantastic update of her source material.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2018
    Awesome Possum likes this.
  12. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Moddin' Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Earth
    It’s trying to justify bad writing by claiming it was intentional.
     
  13. T'Bonz

    T'Bonz Romulan Curmudgeon Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2000
    Location:
    Across the Neutral Zone
    Well duh, of course she's not a real person. However, she is presented in her fictional universe as a real woman and she made a really boneheaded choice.

    It's disheartening to know that even though "her kind of story is something that's been in myth and literature for a eons" that a supposedly futuristic woman would make a catastrophic choice like that. Do people never LEARN from history? The romance just yanked me right out of the movie - I'm like why would this woman in her position in her universe hook up with this guy? Answer: She wouldn't unless something was really wrong in her brainbox. :p
     
    Awesome Possum likes this.
  14. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Moddin' Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Earth
    For a character to work, you need to be able to relate to them on some way. District 9 did that with a bug alien. He was completely non-human but had recognizable desires and emotions. He wanted to save his son and his people from a horrific existence that's about to get worse. We can relate to that desire and get emotionally invested in him.

    I can't relate to a woman, depicted as a serious yet still warm and friendly woman spend time with a man who she last saw ten years ago when they were children. A man who immediately begins making creepy comments about her. They shove them into romantic locals, but he keeps going on rants about Obi-Wan. It's not even awkward, it's disturbing. Then he admits to mass murder, not with regret or remorse but with vicious anger. There isn't a person alive who wouldn't immediately back away slowly. Yet she comforts him and can't believe he does it again years later, finally turning on her. It's like a Lifetime movie where you're supposed to root for them staying together.
     
  15. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    While it makes for horrible Star Wars movies, sadly I've seen that kind of relationship play out in my social circle all too often.

    Just assume all the words they say are bollocks, Padme thought Anni had a hot bod and that overrode any big obvious warning signs he telegraphed.
     
  16. wayoung

    wayoung Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Location:
    wayoung
    Wow. "The sequels suck because they don't have a romance on the level of Anakin and Padme" was not a complaint I was expecting.
     
    Campe and Captaindemotion like this.
  17. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
  18. TREK_GOD_1

    TREK_GOD_1 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Location:
    Escaped from Delta Vega
    The Force change was big enough. Nearly everything in the SW galaxy hinges on the Force (either it using people or people using it), so for the perception/use/philosophy to change so drastically, it was going to have an impact n everything else (in the greater conflict) without the need for certain character motifs (at least among the new, young heroes) to change. That's the fairy tale hook.


    The Lucas mythology--SW--was created in the 70s, but as Lucas as state time and again, he wanted to create something that would send an unambiguous message about ideas of good and evil, etc. (like a fairy tale) different than the post-Vietnam War, disillusioned, anti-hero films that were overflowing from studios great and small. In borrowing from myths of old, that was the one pillar of tradition in a film that happened to be set in space. Six SW films have gone in that direction for a reason--because it communicates something generations from nearly every corner of the world understands in how it builds characters.

    Padme is not giving in to Anakin's romantic overtures (so its not really force). In fact, she expresses reasons why they should not be together, but it must have been genuine enough that she remains in the relationship after the Sandpeople killings, hence her declaration of love (on Geonosis) moments before they are to be executed. Regarding his ROTS killings, remember, on Mustafar, she's the one pulling away--fearing he's consumed by whatever he's bought into. She did not really believe Obi-Wan;s account (younglings), but she still believed Anakin was losing himself when he (as far as she knows) is a good person.

    From time to time, I've heard some make that argument, but the counter is always: how should she have reacted throughout the PT? Never fallen in love? Or once in a relationship, dump him when something goes wrong? Turn him over to Obi-Wan? She was operating on her faith in her love for him, which is why she confronted him (on Mustafar) in the only way she knew how--not as a senator (or former queen), but as his wife and friend.

    Padme making decisions based on love (no matter Anakin's misdeeds) is not only one of the more realistic emotional reactions of any character in the PT, but accomplishes exactly what Lucas wanted: for her dedicated heart to be repaid with heartbreak for both. Yoda warned that Anakin's atttachements would lead down the wrong path, but he (Anakin), Padme and the galaxy had to pay the price for that. Some may argue over the merits of other parts of the PT, but Lucas captured his intended tragic romance (and why it happened) perfectly.

    Thank you! Well said!
     
  19. TREK_GOD_1

    TREK_GOD_1 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Location:
    Escaped from Delta Vega
    Meaning TLJ leaves us with the idea that everything we were told about how the Force works (from Jedi and Sith alike) was incorrect all along. The idea of the Force being in balance--or needing to be balanced, concepts of dark & light was pretty much tossed out of the window. Add Kylo's sort of "evolving" idea of using his power as expressed to Rey (post Snoke's death) and Yoda's talk with Luke, and TLJ is telling us all of those lives practicing/listening to the Force in a very specific way for--as ANH Kenobi put it--"A thousand generations" (in the service of being Jedi Knights) were wrong. Its like generations of your family serving a political party, and you--based on party tenets--believed you were doing the right thing in the one & only right way, only to find out, you've actually contributed to the problems and/or misunderstanding you were working to solve.
     
  20. Set Harth

    Set Harth Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Location:
    Annwn
    It's from film dialogue.

    There was probably a little more going on than just that. This is SW we're talking about here, not real life; in SW, when something otherwise inexplicable takes place, it usually has to do with the Force.

    The trailer was a fakeout.

    I didn't see that at all, I don't know where you're getting that from.

    Not at all. In fact, the film reinforces this.

    "Balance. Powerful light, powerful darkness."

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2018