MLB 17-18 Offseason: The Giants are preparing for EYBS' return

Discussion in 'Sports and Fitness' started by Timby, Nov 3, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    On the heels of the Cole trade, the Pirates have shipped Andrew McCutchen to ... San Francisco.

    Giants what are you doing
     
  2. Danny99

    Danny99 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Blue Jays sign Curtis Granderson. Someone talk me off a cliff with this one.
     
  3. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    Uh ... 2.1 fWAR / 1.4 bWAR last season, so it could be worse? (I mean, he's still a million years old and dead, but...)
     
  4. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    Pitchers and catchers report in 27 days, 13 position free agents have signed contracts, ~150 free agents remain unsigned.
     
  5. Danny99

    Danny99 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I guess it could be worse, they could re-sign Bautista.
     
  6. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    In today's news...

    -- A great, if long, article by Jeff Passan about what's driving the slow offseason (and how Tony Clark got taken to the cleaners in last year's negotiations; basically, he chose the beer keg over the dental plan).

    -- The MLBPA has rejected MLB's pace-of-play proposals. Originally the league proposed a pitch clock that would not be in effect if runners were on base, a limit to six mound visits per game and 35 seconds between batters. The union rejected that, and as a result the league has come back with far harsher rules: 20-second pitch clock, period, one mound visit per inning and 30 seconds between batters. The union has no recourse for this, because as a result of Tony Clark being a fucking idiot, the union signed a CBA that allows the commissioner to unilaterally impose rules of play.

    -- The Dodgers are in financial hell right now due to their debt situation (and it won't get any better when their TV deal implodes, which will be sooner rather than later).

    -- lolmets
    [​IMG]
    :lol:
     
    BillJ likes this.
  7. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    Side note: Who (or what) is "EYBS"? :confused:
     
  8. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    Even-Year Bullshit.
     
  9. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    I saw a article on MLB Trade Rumors (I think), that part of the problem is front offices are no longer willing to pay for what a player has done. They're using statistical projections for offers. Someone like JD Martinez simply won't be worth $30 million a year during his age 38 season. :eek:
     
    Yanks likes this.
  10. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    I've been thinking that MLB should adopt a free agency system similar to the NHL's (without the onus of restricted free agency, which is just a bad joke). Say you cap rookie contracts at three years, then then a player goes to arbitration. Team control for players on the 40-man lasts for ... I don't know, let's call it six years or age 27, whichever comes first, then they're a free agent.
     
  11. Herbert

    Herbert Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2017
    Location:
    Herbert
    That's what they should be doing with older players. Obviously you can't predict the future but for older players, they should not pay based on past performance. It's a different story with younger players, although there is obvious risk there as well.
     
  12. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    You want a player in his prime? You're going to pay for some off-prime years. And you never, ever know who's going to age well and who's going to age horribly. It's a risk. That's the cost of doing business; there's no such thing as a sure bet.
     
  13. Herbert

    Herbert Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2017
    Location:
    Herbert
    Of course. However, paying a 25/26 year old for 7 years is a bit different than paying a 30/31 year old for 7 years.
     
  14. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    To a certain extent, yes, but labor shouldn't be treated like cattle.
     
  15. Herbert

    Herbert Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2017
    Location:
    Herbert
    If paying me tens of millions of dollars to play baseball for a living is treating me like cattle, well I say "moo" to that.
     
    BillJ and Mr. Laser Beam like this.
  16. Scout101

    Scout101 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Location:
    Rhode Island, USA
    Problem is more with the pay on the front end. Players want to get 30M at age 40 because they got paid peanuts at age 25 when they were still good. Owners are getting smarter about not paying max contracts years after the player became washed up.

    To really fix things, gotta drastically raise the arbitration pay, or take most of those years into FA instead. Without steroids (as much), people are just about washed up before they hit FA half the time, and then are shocked that the payday doesn't come.

    and then maybe not pay the minor leagues slave wages, but that's not exactly the same issue...
     
  17. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    God, the mealy-mouthed equivocating from Clark on that issue is nauseating.
     
  18. Scout101

    Scout101 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Location:
    Rhode Island, USA
    Seems an easy fix if you're trying to get more money from the owners into the system without screwing with the MLB wages too much. Just set the miLB minimums higher. Doesn't even have to be crazy, but they're making like 1500-2k/month, and only during the season. that just doesn't work. Make it at least a living wage, and something like (random numbers) 30k for A ball or lower, 40k for AA, 50k for AAA. All minimums, can pay more as you like. Know I just recommended spending tons more money, and at the lower end that's a LOT of players to pay and not a lot to live off of, but it's a ton better than now. If the MLB owners were responsible for the delta between today's pay and new pay, it wouldn't kill the miLB owners trying to make money off of $5 tickets, either.

    Baseball's "problem" is the high flameout rate. Way too many wash out, so they don't want to pay tons upfront until you know they're going to make it. NFL players can be stars right out of the gate, MLB player may not make the Show for 5-6 years normally.

    At the end, know it's owners screwing the players over, but gotta be a way to smooth that out some. Problem being that they are negotiating with the MLB PA, not the minors or even really the younger MLB players. Too many of them are vested in getting THEIR money, and are already through the minors. Screw the kids, they sacrificed and made it for the promise of money later, pay up. So nothing changes, but now the owners aren't paying on the back end...
     
  19. Timby

    Timby o yea just like that Administrator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    That's the difference between the MLBPA of years past and the MLBPA of today. When the MLBPA went on strike in 1981, after initially having a united front, some of the older players began to fray (this is when Bob Boone started back-channel negotiations with Lee MacPhail), particularly Robin Yount, who went to Marvin Miller and said, "We've gotten our pensions, we've gotten our salaries hiked, we've even got free agency; why are we on strike to hold the line on free agent compensation? Can't we just let them have that?" Despite repeated meetings with the executive board, Miller still sensed that the union wasn't completely buying in.

    So Miller brought out the big guns. He called a meeting of the union membership, with a few hundred players in attendance, and Miller didn't speak: Robin Roberts, who had been in baseball since 1948 and witnessed the birth of the MLBPA, came out and addressed the players, and he told them in no uncertain terms: "You aren't doing this for yourselves. You're doing this for the people who come after you, and the generation after them." Afterwards, a vote was taken of the full membership to see if the strike should continue, and it was unanimously in favor.

    Today's MLBPA is essentially run by the high-priced veterans. They had Michael Weiner's ear (that's how abominable bullshit like the qualifying offer came around, selling mid-tier players up the river), and they have Clark's (negotiating in the CBA for bullshit like a team chef in the clubhouse, or two seats on the bus, as opposed to real issues).

    Considering they make literal billions for their bosses, I don't see an issue with players being paid tens of millions of dollars. What I do have an issue with is ownership's rather transparent desire to cast aside guys once they're over 30 and pay them relative peanuts.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2018
  20. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    Skål!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.