Updating TOS

Discussion in 'Future of Trek' started by Gojira, May 19, 2017.

  1. StarCruiser

    StarCruiser Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Location:
    Houston, we have a problem...
    ^ Let's not - please!
     
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Well, I think the Casablanaca was kind of experimented with in a little picture called Foodfight. Not sure if you have heard of it.
     
  3. Nerys Myk

    Nerys Myk A Spock and a smile Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    AI Generated Madness
    I guess you've never heard of the 1955 and 1983 TV versions of Casablanca. The 1955 version was set in 1955 rather than during WWII.
     
  4. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    Well, we already have one successful updated version of TOS; they've made three movies in the last decade.

    Discovery may well seque into a kind of TOS reboot after five or six years. Why not?
     
  5. Gojira

    Gojira Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Location:
    Stompin' on Tokyo
    I would like that!!
     
  6. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    That would be fantastic.
     
  7. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    Right now HBO is trying to generate one or more Westeros-based spinoff shows from GoT, and supposedly something like that has been discussed regarding Westworld. There's no reason that if Discovery is a success for CBS All-Access and Netflix that they wouldn't at some point want to leverage it into another series, and given the setting and characters a series about Kirk and Spock aboard the Enterprise would have to be a contender.
     
  8. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Not only 'No,' but HELLO NO!!
     
  9. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    If it means more "Star Trek" on screen, why not?
     
  10. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    Since the JJ-verse has the whole partial reboot angle covered, and Star Trek Continues has the whole authentic-looking continuation with new actors angle covered, and Discovery has a new show in the Prime timeline covered. that really just leaves either an Enterprise B show or a hard reboot a la Battlestar Galactica, only less grimdark. What would that look like?
    The New Paradigm Daleks would like to hire you as their new PR director.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  11. Refuge

    Refuge Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    I agree. I was watching a preview for Wonder Woman the other day, I could barely define what was going on. It was too dark.

    Discovery is also drab (thus far) visually. It won't last five or six years.
     
    Thowra likes this.
  12. Gojira

    Gojira Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Location:
    Stompin' on Tokyo
    I don't see Discovery as visually drab at all and this was the type of esthetic I had in mind when I started this thread.
     
  13. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Why not? I would imagine that things will change in that course of time.
     
  14. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    Cue the New Paradigm Klingons in Season 3.
     
    Jedman67 likes this.
  15. Ralphis

    Ralphis Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Location:
    [Redacted]
    I'm not sure if it's such a hot idea to do something like that to TOS. The Remastered versions alone caused enough uproar, something like this would blow up the internet.
     
  16. Jedman67

    Jedman67 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2015
    Location:
    Jedman67
    As long as they have the salt-and-pepper pot helmets, we're good.
     
  17. TREK_GOD_1

    TREK_GOD_1 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Location:
    Escaped from Delta Vega
    Yes, because it does not appeal to those of the moment, it must be bad.


    Exactly. If some are so narrow minded that anything that does not share the same design or express the same tone, thought or view of those only knowing (or caring to know) the here and now, then they are free to explore something else, but original works of art had specific reasons behind their creation with the influences of an equally specific period of time. That did not include a thought toward or need for constant revisions or so-called improvements.

    Why not? They're black and white, and the characters do not appeal to current viewer sensibilities. Full steam ahead!
     
  18. MANT!

    MANT! Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Location:
    in Atomo-vision
    AS a commercial prospect, a new update of TOS is almost a no-brainer.. last time I checked, CBS pays almost no rights fees to the actors or estates.
    To them it's almost pure profit every time TOS, TOS/R is run or sold...So an update of the bridge displays etc. may be in the future
    (4K or 8K remaster anyone?)

    in several cases during the TOS /R development,
    CBS Digital wanted to change certain displays but were constrained by time and budget..
     
  19. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    So. What's wrong with that? Are people really incapable of viewing the product in the context of the time in which it was made? I bet you people don't even enjoy silent films!
     
  20. Balok's Decoy

    Balok's Decoy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2016
    Location:
    Balok's Decoy in Baltimore, MD
    Trekkies: How dare you set a new Trek series in the TOS era! Give us something new! Set it 10,000 years after the Dominion War or nothing at all!!
    Also Trekkies: Abrams-Trek is not my Star Trek! It's a loud explosion of CGI nonsense! Star Trek is about the stories!
    Also Trekkies: Why don't you just remake TOS so it looks better?