'White genocide in space': Racist "fans" seething at racial diversity in Discovery...

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by Trajet, May 25, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Awesome Possum

    Awesome Possum Moddin' Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    Location:
    Earth
    I accidentally a word. I meant their minds, meaning bigots.
     
  2. Michael

    Michael Good Bad Influence Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Location:
    Aloha Quadrant
    So many posts to “like” in this thread! Thanks to all the level headed and eloquent Star Trek fans. I'm so glad you guys make up the majority around here.

    This very topic has bothered me for a few days, too, since I saw a few disheartening posts on a German Star Trek site. I just can't get behind racist/supremacist/sexist people who claim they are Star Trek fans. To be perfectly frank, I'm at a loss how to deal with them. :(

    But that would be an easy answer, wouldn't it? I think the truth is that they are actually Star Trek fans.

    Yes, that's my experience, too. People enjoy the show for many different reasons. Some even for rather questionable ones.
     
  3. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    My point was simply that once a person's opinion expand into the realm of physical influence they are not longer just opinions but actions. It is impossible to have a violent opinion, becasue opinions cannot cause physical harm.
     
  4. Robert Maxwell

    Robert Maxwell memelord Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    Location:
    space
    Of course, people vote based on their opinions, and the people put into power by those opinions can indeed carry out violence based on them. And that's just one example.

    The line between opinion and action isn't as clearly-defined as you think it is.
     
    O_Kav likes this.
  5. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    But opinions can't be artificially separated like that, they are part of an organic process from ideological violence, to rhetorical violence, to physical violence. One year you're hating in your head, the next you're making speeches about it and the next you're building gas chambers.
     
    Nyotarules, O_Kav and Robert Maxwell like this.
  6. Long Syntax

    Long Syntax Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2015
    Discerning peoples thoughts is quite Orwellian - but of course the ends justifies the means.
     
    Apparition B5 likes this.
  7. Jesse1066

    Jesse1066 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2014
    Location:
    Washington State
    The entire concept of "white genocide" is BS, and Star Trek has always been pretty progressive. Ironically, the closest thing there is to a politically conservative Star Trek series is probably DS9.
     
    Awesome Possum and O_Kav like this.
  8. Jedi_Master

    Jedi_Master Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Location:
    Hurricane Alley
    As is the case with any bodies of fiction that are the result of thousands of creative inputs over decades of time, there is a way to tease out support in Star Trek for almost any political viewpoint.
     
    ThatChapThere likes this.
  9. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    Not remotely, on either point. I'm not making any point about law or state action, only about the connections between human thought, speech and action.
     
  10. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    I never said opinions weren't more complex. I just said that having an opinion doesn't necessarily result in gas chamber construction. I don't know about you but if I dislike someone, I'm still capable of keeping my personal feelings aside and working professionally with them.

    What I fear is that you are advocating that we outlaw all but Approved Opinions. Because first, just how do you plan on enforcing such laws? And second who gets to decide what the Approved Opinions are?
     
  11. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    Neither of us mentioned laws or state actions.
     
    Robert Maxwell likes this.
  12. uniderth

    uniderth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Yes, I figure we've all meandered pretty far at this point. I'm going to step out for a while.

    Peace!:beer:
     
  13. m.lp.ql.m

    m.lp.ql.m Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Location:
    The "Bubble"
    There's no one right way for everyone. Divorce isn't necessarily a bad thing. If two people can mutually agree to get married, then they should also be free to grow and mutually agree to become un-married if they wish. Divorce is only a problem because of the conservative stigma (is that a redundancy?) associated with it.
     
  14. O_Kav

    O_Kav Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Location:
    Brazil
    And how ironic that is...

    DS9 has so many episodes that would anger a lot of the folks who believe in BS like "white genocide". The one where Nog forms a Union and strikes with the workers of Quark's bar, the several ones where Kira's actions in the Bajoran War were justified, that one where Sisko says he hates 60s Vegas because of the racism that dominated the period... Not to mention Ferengis like Quark and the Grand Nagus that act like a parody of people who hate the Welfare State.

    If aired today, DS9 would receive a lot of hate from the reactionary crowd. God, I hope Discovery manages to bother these people even more. :guffaw:
     
  15. Philip Guyott

    Philip Guyott Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Location:
    England
    Last edited: May 25, 2017
  16. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    And Abrams is sexist.
     
  17. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    astral plane
    These videos make me sad, ill, and angry. Star Trek fans or not, it's just sad that there are pathetic human beings like these. There's no room in my life for these sorts of people.
     
  18. Refuge

    Refuge Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    Star Trek has always pushed buttons in its audience. I don't quite understand why this any different, other than we have such instant access to the fallout. I remember when Janeway was made Captain. If you see the auditions the producers did allow men to audition without ever really wanting a man in the role. Tough luck. However when Voyager was screened it was complete nonsense that Kate Mulgrew was going to be walking around as Janeway doing anything other than being the.. Captain. She wasn't walking around wearing a placard for women's rights she WAS that, with her rights not replacing a males or bringing him down, she just had the same ones. I know this might be controversial but I actually felt her femaleness made for the right Captain for the struggle Voyager had. I do think we should be equal but I think there are still differences in us. Janeway was enhanced by being all things she was. Her skills, her experiences, her crew and her gender. Yes a male Captain is no lesser but the journey and story would have been different.

    Star Trek does its best work when it shows its effort for equality as being an accepted part of the system. So if these new characters in Discovery just get on with their jobs that is all that should matter. It's going to come down to grabbing the audience's imagination, that's what I'd be more worried about. And the integrity of the Klingons.. lol.
     
  19. Captain of the USS Averof

    Captain of the USS Averof Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2016
    Location:
    Greece
    I hope this video makes you (and us) feel a little better:

     
    CorporalCaptain likes this.
  20. Shawnster

    Shawnster Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Location:
    Clinton, OH
    [SIZE=16px][/SIZE]
    You mean to say you never have had your mind or opinion changed when presented with facts or appealed to on the basis of compassion or emotion? You have never engaged in a discussion or series of discussions and come away with a different point of view than before the discussion?

    Are you saying it is impossible to win hearts and influence minds?
     
    Qonundrum and Armus like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.