• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Day of the Doctore Review Thread (Spoilers?)

So what did you think?

  • Brilliant: Geronimo.

    Votes: 188 77.7%
  • Very Good: Bow Ties are Cool!

    Votes: 38 15.7%
  • Ok: Come along Ponds.

    Votes: 10 4.1%
  • Passable: Fish Fingers and Custard.

    Votes: 5 2.1%
  • Terrible: Who da man?

    Votes: 1 0.4%

  • Total voters
    242
  • Poll closed .
Billie Piper was quite good as The Moment's personality, nicely quiet and subtle. I guess it helps she wasn't Rose. ;) that being said, I don't see why we needed her back

Fan service plus she helped relaunch Doctor Who.

The Doctor's solution of the duplicates by making them not know which was human and which was Zygon. If only all peace treaties were so easily achieved.

I think that was the point. If we forget all our differences and focus on our similarities we can achieve peace. A little naive but a good message for kids.

A bit fanwanky but it was cool to see that all of The Doctors were involved in making Gallifrey disappear, including a cool, if weird cameo by Capaldi. How all of The Doctors suddenly get involved isn't really explained but I'll let it slide.

I loved his bad-ass thousand yard stare. As for why they all appeared. The moment had the power to break pretty much all the rules of time (it is the ultimate weapon). Perhaps it planned the original timeline so the Doctor could learn from his mistake.
 
Yeah, same time as we see the actual regeneration into the Curator - btw surprised nobody picked up on the “wearing a bit thin” line?

Uhh, no, Hurt regenerated into Eccleston. He's a past incarnation of the Doctor, not a future one -- that's the whole point of the story. That's also the point of Hurt's line about hoping his ears would be less prominent -- Eccleston had very prominent ears, and this line ties in with Eccleston's reaction to seeing his ears in the mirror in "Rose."



We are told the Daleks killed themselves completely in the crossfire.
And we know that those events were time locked.
How does that jive with what we learned about the Dalek's fate during Parting of the Ways and Stolen Earth?
So the Time War is STILL time locked, even though it ends differently than we thought?

It ends with the Daleks and Gallifrey both being removed from the universe -- it's just that Gallifrey went somewhere else and only appeared to be blown up.


Surely the Doctor will find some way around the limit, but it won't be a given. I suspect Capaldi's Doctor's personality will be shaped by his awareness that he's the last


Eh? he knows he's not - that's the whole point of the scene with Tom Baker.

Hmm, maybe. But if he was crossing his timestream there, who knows if he'll remember it?


He may be accpeted as part of them as a 1200 year old + lifespan but he will never truly be one of the Doctor's.

That's not what his later selves said. They said he was more the Doctor than any of them.


I'm more interested in the daleks that weren't blockading Gallifrey. Are they alive now that the moment wasn't used?

There were none. The Time Lord generals said that the Daleks were throwing everything they had at Gallifrey.

See, this doesn't change anything. This is the way things always happened -- it's just that what looked like Gallifrey's destruction was actually its removal to a pocket universe.


Well, that was a blast to watch, although at the same time I feel kind of let down. The episode felt like a rush job, we start off with Clara now a school teacher with no explanation of what the hell happened after the cliffhanger scene in Name of the Doctor. That kind of annoyed me.

That wasn't really a cliffhanger. We know the Doctor had arrived to bring Clara home, and we saw them turn and start to walk away. So that problem was essentially solved, even if we weren't shown the payoff.


I've been trying all summer to "correct" people who claim John Hurt is just a replacement because Christopher Eccleston turned things down, feeling that with the way the cliffhanger scene played out they would have had Hurt there anyway, but now I'm not so sure. Yes, Hurt was awesome and perfect for the role but it really kind of felt like it was originally written for Eccleston.

I don't see that. It felt like it was written for this Doctor, an older man who was nonetheless not yet haunted by the guilt of a choice he hadn't made yet. This Doctor was scornful of the others' quirky mannerisms and speech, but Eccleston's Doctor had a similar fast-talking, pop-culture-referencing style. This Doctor was distinctly his own man.


Doesn't this sappy "think of the children" reset button kind of ignore the fact that the Time Lords posed just as much a threat as the Daleks did? For that matter, isn't everything we just saw in The End of Time now undone?

Not necessarily. I don't think it's sappy to want to avoid punishing children for the sins of their leaders. I think that now that Gallifrey is frozen in time in a pocket universe, the Doctor has an opportunity -- and plenty of time --to think of a better way to deal with Rassilon and the corruption of the Council, a way that won't sacrifice the innocent.


And finally, a question. They aren't exactly too clear but is John Hurt's regeneration supposed to be the result of natural causes?

Old age, same as his first regeneration. Hence the reuse of the line "wearing a bit thin."


Frankly, as nice as it was to get a glimpse of the Time War and a war-ravaged Gallifrey, I was a bit disappointed, too. The mystery of the Time War, fought by "two almighty civilizations" as the Master put it, was that we really couldn't comprehend what that kind of war would be like. But apparently it's just a bunch of Daleks shooting at soldiers. :shrug: Could've been any war from any era. Took a lot of mystery out of it.

Well, we only saw its final battle. This wasn't a story about the Time War, it was a story about the ending of the war.


- How did the older doctors knew to come, did they use the Moment to break the timeline there as well?

I'd assume that the Doctors, with the help of the Moment/Bad Wolf, contacted their past selves and recruited them to participate in running the computation. Capaldi probably showed up because he remembered these events from his previous life, although the first eleven, Hurt included, no doubt forgot about the event afterward.


And I never thought Eleventh forgot about the Time War... just that he moved on, as all people eventually do when given the space and the time to do so (no pun intended). Sure, its great that he wanted to do that, but really, it was just forced.

If you avoided thinking about something for 400 years, you'd probably be foggy on its details too. It was never said that he'd literally forgotten the whole thing, just that he'd avoided facing the memory for a very long time.


And to me, it undermined completely the Hurt Doctor. Here's the Doctor at his darkest, and when he makes the decision that will haunt him for three more incarnations. At the very least, I was hoping he'd sacrifice himself for his future selfs, so that they and his past selves can save Gallifrey effectively while preventing the Daleks (or anyone else) from finding out the truth of Gallifrey's dissapearence. That way, he could still have a redeeming (for his wartime activities) ending.

He did[]/i] have a redemptive ending. He participated in saving billions of lives. This isn't Battlestar Galactica or Game of Thrones or one of those fashionably dark and dismal franchises. Davies let the show become a little too dark, and I'm glad to see Moffat taking a more optimistic approach, where a hero can redeem his past mistakes without having to die in the process.


His regeneration in his TARDIS doesn't really make sense.

I think it works fine. People close to death often cling to life until some final goal is reached and then seem to let go and die soon thereafter. The War Doctor probably willed himself to keep going until he ended the war, and once that was resolved, he stopped fighting and let himself go.


Its wonderful, until the Zygon threat is dealt with (offscreen, sadly).

It's not offscreen. The Doctors deal with the threat by forcing the Zygons to conduct peace talks with UNIT. Everything after that is just long, dry negotiations which we wouldn't want to have onscreen.


And the absolute fankwank that is all the Doctors around Gallifrey was fantastic (which reminds me, was the First Doctor's dialogue newly recorded material from John Guilor?).

I hope so.
 
Hang on, the story ends with the Doctor radically changing his past. What we see near the end isn't what originally happened; the War Doctor originally used the Moment by himself, and burned Gallifrey. But earlier on, we see that Eleven remembers some of what's going to happen, so it must always have happened....YE GODS, I'M SO F***ING CONFUSED, SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

And what's the deal with the Curator looking like an older Fourth Doctor? Is that supposed to mean something?
 
Absolutely loved it! I think the only thing I was disappointed with was 'Rose' not really appearing, but whatever. I need to watch it again.

John Hurt was a real pleasure to watch, as was the Tennant/Smith double act. I was laughing at them one minute, and then transfixed at the more dramatic moments.

Elizabeth I was very funny, and I liked that they picked up the thread that was dangled back during Tennant's reign.

I was a bit concerned at first when the Doctors decided to change the past. Sure it was a terrible event that finally ended the Time War, but it shaped the present day Doctor into the man he became. It was a very important early series arc. I'm just glad that it was played out so well with all the incarnations of the Doctor, and that it means the groundwork is laid for Capaldi to have a Find Gallifrey storyline.

The trailer for the Christmas special tickled me in the right way too.
 
Hang on, the story ends with the Doctor radically changing his past. What we see near the end isn't what originally happened; the War Doctor originally used the Moment by himself, and burned Gallifrey. But earlier on, we see that Eleven remembers some of what's going to happen, so it must always have happened....YE GODS, I'M SO F***ING CONFUSED, SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

And what's the deal with the Curator looking like an older Fourth Doctor? Is that supposed to mean something?
Never let continuity get in the way of telling a fun story. Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey, much like Abra Cadabra. He's a later Doctor who happens to look like the 4th seemingly.
 
Hang on, the story ends with the Doctor radically changing his past. What we see near the end isn't what originally happened; the War Doctor originally used the Moment by himself, and burned Gallifrey. But earlier on, we see that Eleven remembers some of what's going to happen, so it must always have happened....YE GODS, I'M SO F***ING CONFUSED, SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

And what's the deal with the Curator looking like an older Fourth Doctor? Is that supposed to mean something?
Never let continuity get in the way of telling a fun story. Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey, much like Abra Cadabra. He's a later Doctor who happens to look like the 4th seemingly.

Is that for sure though?
 
After this I REALLY want to see more of the Hurt and McGann Doctors once the new Doctor is bedded in.

And Donna wasn't in it !

Truly thankful...
 
I was a bit concerned at first when the Doctors decided to change the past. Sure it was a terrible event that finally ended the Time War, but it shaped the present day Doctor into the man he became.

Only the 11th/12th Doctor remembers what happened. I think part of the explanation is in the end when he has the dream about Gallifrey. Maybe he's always had that dream and only now knows the significance.
 
Hang on, the story ends with the Doctor radically changing his past. What we see near the end isn't what originally happened; the War Doctor originally used the Moment by himself, and burned Gallifrey. But earlier on, we see that Eleven remembers some of what's going to happen, so it must always have happened....YE GODS, I'M SO F***ING CONFUSED, SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

And what's the deal with the Curator looking like an older Fourth Doctor? Is that supposed to mean something?
Never let continuity get in the way of telling a fun story. Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey, much like Abra Cadabra. He's a later Doctor who happens to look like the 4th seemingly.

Is that for sure though?
You have a greater concern to nail down these things than I do. Earlier, Lonemagpie quoted dialogue from the scene which supports Baker being a later regeneration. It works for me, regardless.

My bad, it was JoeZhang who quoted the dialogue.
http://www.trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=8929804&postcount=105
 
Forgot to mention how awesome it was to see the original opening titles on the bug screen! I just wish they played the whole thing instead of cutting it short.

Also, I have to rewatch the scene again, but it seemed to me we got a glimpse of Eccleston's face during the regeneration, akin to young Hurt in "The Night if the Doctor." But maybe it's just me.
 
I absolutely loved it. I am so glad that I went to see the special in a cinema, even though the entrance fee was too high. But this was totally worth it. I even enjoyed the 3D, which was much better IMHO than the 3D version of the first Hobbit movie. I would really like to watch it again on a big screen (Doctor Who, not The Hobbit).
 
First, Doctor Hurt regenerated because he was no longer needed (the warrior that 8 requested to be). That's why he said something like "it figures".
Second, Baker was a future regen and this also ties into face picking abilities that may be used explaining Capaldi.

Third, and slightly off topic, watching EOT and I am pissed they cut the book signing and Sigma's sing you to sleep speech
 
Fantastic, seeing it on the big screen was a treat and the 3D was pretty good.

The bit with Strax doing the no phones and be quiet bit at the start of the screening was a hoot.
Same here on all counts. The intro with Smith was equally great.

For me, this was hands down the greatest multi-Doctor episode and one of Moffat's very best. The interaction between Smith, Tennant and Hurt, or any combination thereof, was priceless.

Aside from that, there were so many wonderful moments (Roundels. Baker. "It wasn't locked.") that it's hard to choose a favourite, but if I had to I'd probably go for the Capaldi moment ("No, sir. All thirteen").

There are some niggles, though. The Elizabeth I scenes appear to happen a couple of years too early in the Doctor's timeline (unless the wedding scene happens two years after the rest of the episode for him). The age of Hurt's Doctor (both actual and biological) is equally problematic. If the regeneration into Eccleston is when he's 800ish, then it looks like we can chop a few centuries from every mention of the Doctor's age in the original run. I kind of wish the Moff had used the opportunity to clear up the apparent discrepancy between the Doctor's ages as stated in OldWho and NuWho. It wouldn't have been too difficult, either.

But those are minor issues and observations. I think this episode is one for the ages, not to mention being one for all ages.
 
Last edited:
The curator makes more sense on a 2nd viewing. Another version of this Doctor or the next it seems. Great to see Tom Baker he had said that he'd regretted not appearing in the 25th anniversary. But he got the chance here and what an impact it had.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top