The location stuff doesn't personally bother me. More amusing, and am used to a certain crazy artistic licence in this city.
It's not uncommon to favor a scenic location over geographic accuracy. In Continuum, a show that's actually set in Vancouver as well as filmed there, the famous Vancouver Public Library is used to represent the exterior of the city's police headquarters.
In Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves, Robin lands at the White Cliffs of Dover with 'We'll be in Nottingham by nightfall'.
That's not bad going - it's 215 miles !
And he took that left turn at Albuquerque.They were on really fast horses.
And was it just me, or is Watson writing about Holmes a nod to the books and how they were told from "his" perspective?
Now to get to what you inferred, a very interesting turn with Mycroft. I hope it's not as sinister as implied but I guess we'll see. I have really enjoyed Rhys Ifan and hope these developments means we'll see him more.
A quick thought on last night's ELEMENTARY. Specifically, the final scene with Mycroft.
I really like Rhys Ifans. I think he has great rapport with Johnny Lee Miller. I have no problem buying them as brothers.
But he hasn't struck me as Mycroft. Until last night. And, specifically, the final scene, alone in The Diogenes.
For those not playing at home, ELEMENTARY'S Mycroft is a restaurateur and a leukemia survivor. He had come to New York City to bond with his brother, with whom he's had a terrible relationship, and open a new restaurant, The Diogenes. Neither of these struck me as "right"; I felt that ELEMENTARY was, in this case, trying too hard to differentiate itself from SHERLOCK, and what we ended up with was a character with the same name but none of the same attributes as the Canon Mycroft.
In the episode, Mycroft delivered a message to Sherlock from their father (who hasn't been named, but I'll call Siger because of William S. Baring-Gould) -- Siger expected Sherlock to return to London, and he was in danger of being cut off if he didn't.
Sherlock hems and haws throughout the episode, and interestingly we get an explanation for why ELEMENTARY's Sherlock has focused exclusively on murders; he turns down ordinary cases so he can work with the NYPD. (This addressed one of my long-standing problems with ELEMENTARY; the Canon Holmes took all sorts of cases because they engaged him, from missing persons to purloined papers, and murder was only one small part of that.) In the end, he gives Mycroft a letter for Siger that lays out why he intends to remain in New York, whatever the cost.
In the final scene with Mycroft (which may be the final scene of the episode, come to think of it), we see Mycroft alone, in The Diogenes. He takes the sealed letter out of his jacket. He looks at it. He tears it up. (Which had me yell at my television, "No, Mycroft! How could you?")
And then he calls someone.
They have a conversation. It seems that it's not Siger that wants Sherlock to come home after all. Rather, Mycroft is working with someone to either 1) get Sherlock out of New York or 2) get Sherlock back to London. And since this attempt to pry Sherlock out of New York failed, there will be others.
Now, the way I immediately read this scene was, "Oh, damn, Mycroft is working with the season's Big Bad. Or possibly Moriarty." Which would be interesting; I like Natalie Dormer's interpretation of Moriarty.
But then I said, "No. Just no. No Evil Mycroft! No Evil Mycroft!"
Then I realized that was the point. I think we're supposed to think the former -- Mycroft is working with nefarious persons to get Sherlock to London -- and I've no doubt that when he reappears (February sweeps, no doubt) we'll see something happen that makes us question Mycroft's loyalties. But there's no basis at all for Evil Mycroft in the Canon. Instead, I remembered that Mycroft has been playing a subtle game with Sherlock, to get Sherlock to do something he doesn't ordinarily want to do but would if coached in the right way. This time, the coaching didn't work.
And this sold me on Rhys Ifans' Mycroft.
This is who I think Mycroft is. He's working for MI-6, his chain of restaurants around the world give him reasons to travel, and he's trying to get a valuable asset back to the UK that he can use very unofficially. It's important to remember the dinner conversation, where Mycroft mentions that Sherlock would have gone back to working with Scotland Yard. This would put Sherlock in a position to work on cases that have bearing on Mycroft's (deep undercover) work. After all, who looks for a spymaster in a restaurant?
I know, I'm theorizing well in advance of the evidence and that invariably biases the result. I know that I'm out if we get Evil Mycroft, because that's a change too far from the Canon. I know that I want ELEMENTARY's Mycroft to be more like his Canon counterpart, and thus I'm twisting what little we know to make that fit.
I want to be right.
1) We know from a text message we saw last season that Daddy Holmes's first initial is M.
2) Several episodes have featured Holmes taking on cases that weren't initially homicides, such as a kidnapping and an impossible heist, and he's also taken on cases for people other than the police, like when he was hired to track down the guy who leaked the government secrets. However, all those cases eventually ended up involving homicides in one way or another.
Keep in mind that I write from the perspective of someone who has had very little experience with Sherlock Holmes stories in the past and knows next to nothing about the canon Mycroft.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.