=Greg Cox;8774356
Now you can argue that it's redundant to have an introduction AND a stylized credits sequence. Maybe they need to combine the two somehow . . . .
That's the point I was trying to make, but thank you.

=Greg Cox;8774356
Now you can argue that it's redundant to have an introduction AND a stylized credits sequence. Maybe they need to combine the two somehow . . . .
Not only isn't he a total moron, I think he knows more than he lets on, since he knew about the secret room where all the old witch files were kept.
The premise of this one didn't quite work for me. I'm not fond of the myth of the disappearance of the Roanoke colony, because it's not really a mysterious disappearance at all. A lot of early English colonies in North America failed due to the settlers' agricultural incompetence; they simply starved to death, because the authorities responsible for selecting colonists didn't choose them based on survival ability but rather on more political or religious considerations (or something like that). Often those settlers who did survive only did so with the help of neighboring Native Americans who taught them how to farm -- or, in the event of total colony failure, absorbed them into the indigenous communities. That's most likely what happened to the Roanoke settlers -- they suffered famine and the survivors ended up adopted and assimilated into the Croatan population, interbreeding with them so that their European traits blended into the indigenous gene pool. People in later centuries have played up the CROATOAN sign left behind as though it were some big mystery, but that's just because latter-day historians downplayed the presence and agency of native peoples in colonial history, a trend that began in the 19th century and has only been reversed in the past few decades. Arguably it's not mysterious at all -- it's literally telling us where the survivors went.
But the most massive problem was the use of Middle English. They're off by about a century there. The Middle English period ended around 1470. The Roanoke Colony was founded in the 1580s, when William Shakespeare was in his twenties. So their speech should've been Early Modern English, nearly as recognizable as that of Shakespeare's plays or the King James Bible.
Man, I was kinda hoping ancient aliens had something to do with the colonists' disappearance. I would've loved to hear Giorgio Tsoukalos' theory on Roanoake.
The premise of this one didn't quite work for me. I'm not fond of the myth of the disappearance of the Roanoke colony, because it's not really a mysterious disappearance at all. A lot of early English colonies in North America failed due to the settlers' agricultural incompetence; they simply starved to death, because the authorities responsible for selecting colonists didn't choose them based on survival ability but rather on more political or religious considerations (or something like that). Often those settlers who did survive only did so with the help of neighboring Native Americans who taught them how to farm -- or, in the event of total colony failure, absorbed them into the indigenous communities. That's most likely what happened to the Roanoke settlers -- they suffered famine and the survivors ended up adopted and assimilated into the Croatan population, interbreeding with them so that their European traits blended into the indigenous gene pool. People in later centuries have played up the CROATOAN sign left behind as though it were some big mystery, but that's just because latter-day historians downplayed the presence and agency of native peoples in colonial history, a trend that began in the 19th century and has only been reversed in the past few decades. Arguably it's not mysterious at all -- it's literally telling us where the survivors went.
But the most massive problem was the use of Middle English. They're off by about a century there. The Middle English period ended around 1470. The Roanoke Colony was founded in the 1580s, when William Shakespeare was in his twenties. So their speech should've been Early Modern English, nearly as recognizable as that of Shakespeare's plays or the King James Bible.
Not only isn't he a total moron, I think he knows more than he lets on, since he knew about the secret room where all the old witch files were kept.
The archive room is hardly secret; it's part of a government building. The only secret was the access tunnel that led there.
Man, I was kinda hoping ancient aliens had something to do with the colonists' disappearance. I would've loved to hear Giorgio Tsoukalos' theory on Roanoake.
"Isn't it possible that aliens could have abducted the colonists, or even, since they were *cooooooooooooooolonists,* recruited them by offering them a new colony on another planet?"
Let's face it, it's not much of a challenge to figure out what his take on anything would be...
2. Not sure what the problem is here. In the subsequent scenes he tells them that crane and the boy are being transferred. Mills steals the ambulance and that's how they escape. Did you take a pee break at the wrong time?
.
2. Not sure what the problem is here. In the subsequent scenes he tells them that crane and the boy are being transferred. Mills steals the ambulance and that's how they escape. Did you take a pee break at the wrong time?
.
Damn.. I must have.. I don't remember ANY of that..
Which is funny, because i was able to, somehow, hear through the German influences on that language, which made it sound more German at moments than the actual German last week.I was actually understanding the Middle English without the subtitles for a few minutes there.![]()
They need to just do "Story so far" to the tune of "Carry on Wayward Son" and get it over with.I said that about Burn Notice and they kept on putting the same opening narration in front of every episode season after season. They even included it in the series finale. Overkill!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.