That sounds like a pretty narrow definition.Whether the production is sexist will then depend on whether the entire focus is on the men or whether the women are developed as characters.
That sounds like a pretty narrow definition.Whether the production is sexist will then depend on whether the entire focus is on the men or whether the women are developed as characters.
The debate is whether STiD should be in a sexist setting. TOS was sexist and Enterprise stuck with the official gender divide for the sake of canon, although it was abandoned by TMP.
My perspective is a little different on this. I regarded TOS, TNG and ENT as sexist and the TOS/TNG movies to some extent carried this on if you want to look at it from a strict feminist perspective. Not more sexist than the equivalent series/movies made at the same time though.
Even if you include VOY and DS9 I can only think of one human woman who ever took over the command position (even temporarily) on the series' ship/space station - Janeway.
Except maybe Shelby did in TNG and I'm not counting Troi's and Crusher's one off play at command.
Even in DS9, the human women were wives and mothers
Memory Alpha said:"In 2371, Keiko joined an agrobiology expedition on Bajor, where she served as chief botanist."
And I doubt DS9 passes the Bechel Test because I'm sure Bechel was talking about human women.![]()
Does it count as "gender balance" when slightly more than a third of the female characters are exemplars of gender stereotypes?However, doyou accept that it is a franchise that has more gender balance?
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
I just have a bit of a problem with only 'alien' women being capable of command.
Obviously the producers of Star Trek were doubling by having women and aliens being represented in one position.
And I doubt DS9 passes the Bechel Test because I'm sure Bechel was talking about human women.
I'm not really saying DS9 or VOY were sexist. That would be ridiculous. Just that there were not many human females who even temporarily commanded a Starship/Space Station.
Just as in original BSG/Star Wars only men could be pilots
Yes and Keiko was a teacher but I'm talking about having women in charge (not just of O'Brien) just like Kira was at times. Why couldn't they have a human woman in charge of a ship ? Aren't human women capable of it? I think even women are allowed to be 'captains' nowadays. Why not in the 23rd/24th century?
Even some of the 'alien' women who were in command positions were not Starfleet (Kira and T'Pol) or once a man (Dax)
I'm sounding like Janice Lester now.![]()
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
Does it count as "gender balance" when slightly more than a third of the female characters are exemplars of gender stereotypes?However, doyou accept that it is a franchise that has more gender balance?
However, doyou accept that it is a franchise that has more gender balance?
Sure, but what does that matter if it isn't very good? But it's also a TV series not a two-hour movie, it is new and not based on previous material and it didn't have seven core characters it had to service
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
:cough: ... admirals... :cough:
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
:cough: ... admirals... :cough:
IOW, the occasional day player. Minor - a line here, a line there, gone.
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
:cough: ... admirals... :cough:
IOW, the occasional day player. Minor - a line here, a line there, gone.
Compared to Star Trek, it isn't.Does it count as "gender balance" when slightly more than a third of the female characters are exemplars of gender stereotypes?However, doyou accept that it is a franchise that has more gender balance?
Compared to what else we have currently I'd so, "Only a third? That's pretty good!"
Which isn't really helping your case all that much.I'm sure more than a third of the male characters are based on gender stereotypes too
There were practically no human female being in command positions in all the 5 Star Trek series.
As to the rest of your post, you say there weren't a lot of women who commanded a starship or space station, but at least on the space station thing, there was only one that we saw on DS9 and that was DS9. So, there also weren't any other men (save for one) that commanded the space station, unless you want to mention Gul Dukat, but he's not "human."I just have a bit of a problem with only 'alien' women being capable of command.
Obviously the producers of Star Trek were doubling by having women and aliens being represented in one position.
And I doubt DS9 passes the Bechel Test because I'm sure Bechel was talking about human women.
I'm not really saying DS9 or VOY were sexist. That would be ridiculous. Just that there were not many human females who even temporarily commanded a Starship/Space Station.
Just as in original BSG/Star Wars only men could be pilots
Yes and Keiko was a teacher but I'm talking about having women in charge (not just of O'Brien) just like Kira was at times. Why couldn't they have a human woman in charge of a ship ? Aren't human women capable of it? I think even women are allowed to be 'captains' nowadays. Why not in the 23rd/24th century?
Even some of the 'alien' women who were in command positions were not Starfleet (Kira and T'Pol) or once a man (Dax)
I'm sounding like Janice Lester now.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.